Month: July 2017

Topic: Community College shouldn’t be free. Also, I need at least one page turned in by tomorrow as a rough draft. The essay is not due til the 24, but need one page by tomorrow. I ONLY NEED 6 PAGES.

hello I just need an appeal paper for financial aid acceptance

For your final project (and I use project instead of Critical Analysis or Essay on purpose), I want you to choose a topic that you are interested in finding out more about, whether it is Native history or music or ceremony or a specific author you are intrigued by or your own connection to the works you have read in this oh-so-quick course. Your job is to create a compelling research question or thesis and then go forth and research and write, using MLA or APA, a 10-12 page paper, The requirements and suggestions are: 1. Rock star title and research question or thesis (research question/thesis in bold). 2. Use visuals, maps, whatnot…if so inclined a part of this can be in powerpoint or prezi… this can and will count for the page count of 10-12 if it is done well (don’t forget to cite)

Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address In a well-written history paper of no fewer than 400 original words, answer the following question. Be sure to put a word count excluding titles and quotes on the paper. How does Lincoln describe the Civil War? What was his desire for the future? In your opinion, has our country achieved to any degree Lincoln’s desires? Explain your answer and cite examples.

Topic: Select one of the two ethical dilemmas below and examine the case in detail from the perspective of what you think to be the preferred ethical stance from which to approach this issue. In addition to detailing how you think the particular stance you’ve chosen best guides how one should act in the situation, make sure to briefly explain how the ethical stance you’ve chosen makes the outcome or reasoning process different from (or similar to) the other stances you did no choose. In other words, explore your chosen stance in detail, explaining why you think it’s the best stance to take, and also compare and contrast it with at least two other ethical stances. The goal here is for you to learn how to apply a particular type of ethical reasoning (your chosen ‘stance’) to a particular situation and be able to analyze how the theory behind the particular stance directs the reasoning process and action outcome in the situation. From the readings from our first week of Ethics readings in IP, the four Ethical Stance options are: Ethical Egoism, Virtue Ethics (Aristotle), Deontology (Kant),Utilitarianism (Bentham/Mill). Ethical Dilemma Options: Ethical Dilemma A: After stopping by Coldstone after work with friends, you (and only you) witness a woman enter a bank across the street and rob the tellers at gunpoint. No violence breaks out. By happenstance, you come to find out that the robber subsequently donate the money to a child rescue shelter for kids in grave need that was at risk of closing to do funding cuts. The stolen money allowed the shelter to stay open and the kids will continue to receive much needed services. If you report the crime, the money will surely be taken back and the shelter closed. Do you report the crime of keep quiet? Ethical Dilemma B:As a volunteer nurse serving in west Africa for the past month, you’ve come down with the Ebola virus, but you’re still in charge of the facility where everybody now has it. An experimental antibiotic has arrived, which has “not been sufficiently experimented with in enough safe clinical trials with human beings.” You have the opportunity to give the drug to any number of the infected persons, including yourself. Again, the drug has shown to have positive effects on the virus, but its potential harmful side effects are still completely unknown. It is truly experimental. There will be more medical support relief and safer, proven antibiotics coming in three weeks time, but there will likely be 40-50% percent casualty rates in the facility within that time. The exact number can never be known for sure as the virus infects and breaks down different people differently. What do you do (if anything) with the experimental supplement? Administer to all? A few? None? Sample Paper Ex: Details: • Paper must be 5full pages double spaced (2 pgs overview of dilemma ethical and philosophical issues raised by the dilemma/ 3 pgs reflection/analysis) • Cite at least 2 philosophical sources beyond your text book (books, journal, articles, etc.) • Use footnote format • One Inch Margins • Times New Roman font

an expository essay needs to be written. expository essay is a genre of essay that requires the student to investigate an idea, evaluate evidence, expound on the idea, and set forth an argument concerning that idea in a clear and concise manner. Include 1000-1500 words.  Write in Times New Roman, 12 pt. font.  Include one-inch margins on all sides.  Use double spacing (top-to-bottom every page, to include above and below titles and centered words).  Include an APA title page (for all essays) and reference list that includes all of the sources used in the essay.  Include a header.  Include page numbers (upper-right corner only).  Adhere to APA convention and documentation style.  At least one source is required. All sources used must be cited. Choose between cause and effect, problem and solution, or sequential organization types. Create a thesis statement

Each student is required to complete a history essay or essay (50 points). Go to this link, http://www.dhr.history.vt.edu/modules/us/mod09_1960s/index.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and read Introduction, Context, and Evidence sections. Imagine that you’re a student at VPI in the spring of 1970. Choose one of the following four positions: radical protester, moderate antiwar activist, someone who chose not to get involved, and Vietnam War supporter. Now write an imaginary letter to the editor of the student newspaper, The Collegiate Times, explaining your stand vis-à-vis the campus unrest, why you’ve taken that stand, and why you believe your position is superior to those held by the other three groups of students. Your letter should demonstrate an ability to synthesize and understand ideas from a close reading of the relevant evidence, your ability to do so in a clearly way and with supportive evidence from the readings, and your essay should have the right format: introduction, main body, and conclusion without many grammatical and spelling errors. The essay must be over 2000 words long with no grammatical or spelling mistakes.Check online on how to write a good essay, though this assignment requires a letter format. You should save your paper as a MS Word document before you submit it via Turnitin. The Turnitin allows me to trace your source and originality. So, do not plagiarize. Plagiarism is a serious academic offense and you will be penalized accordingly. Rubric for the essay: compelling central message clarity and fluency, and virtually no errors, grammatical or spelling use of strong supportive evidence from the readings organization and format: introduction, main body, and conclusion

The final draft must be submitted using MLA formatting. This paper should also be 750-1000 words (3-4 double-spaced pages). Once again, you WILL need to include in-text citations and a works cited page for this essay.

This business coursework requires you to take on the role of the union representative. You will write an argument appropriate for your role of union rep. that is to be read by the arbitrator as part of his/her decision concerning the arbitration. This assignment is based on: (1) independent research of arbitration jurisprudence (see below); (2) online course material; (3) the textbook; and (4) the assigned case. For this assignment, we will be using the Emma Williams case in Appendix C of the text. Make sure to use version 1 of the case on page 400 of the text. Other versions of the case will not be accepted. In order to understand the principles involved in the case it will be necessary to review relevant arbitral jurisprudence. Specifically, go to the library website and search for Labour Arbitration Cases (LACs). You must cite at least 2 of these cases as part of your arguments. To access online library resources if outside the Memorial campus, you must first identify yourself as a Memorial user by using the Off-campus login. You will be prompted to enter your User ID or Alt ID as well as either your password or your 4 digit PIN number before you can access the articles. If you are having problems logging in, visit How to Access Library Resources from Home and follow the instructions. The completed assignment should require a maximum of 10 typewritten, double-spaced pages (excluding references). To do well on this assignment, you will need to: Demonstrate a sound knowledge of the elements of just cause. Clearly present arguments appropriate for your assigned role of union rep. Cite relevant jurisprudence (LACs) to support your argument. Present your ideas in a clear manner (i.e., grammar, punctuation, style). Use APA formatting for citations in the text and in the reference section at the end of the document. The assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. on July 21, and there will be a 10% grading deduction penalty for each calendar day the assignment is late.

—Critical evaluation essay— —The Damned Human Race by Mark Twain– Decide whether this argument is successful or not. If you decide this essay is successful, discuss why. You may use the structure of the argument, the tone, and the various types of support (ethos, pathos, and logos) as proof of the argument’s success. Make sure that your thesis has an introduction that contains a hook and a thesis, body paragraphs that discuss one proof at a time (one paragraph per example), and a conclusion. If you decide that the essay is not successful, then discuss the fallacies that the argument makes. You are still required to have a strong introduction (hook and thesis), body paragraphs that discuss one fallacy at a time, and a conclusion. You may also discuss how the essay is successful with reservations. In this case, point to both the support and the fallacies you have found in the work. Written in third person (do not use the words I, me, us, we, or you).