Month: July 2017

Need by Today @5pm ***no plag *** 350 words *** 2 source See link for Lesson 2 reading: www.sweethaven02.com/openstax/American_Government-LR.pdf Using concepts and terms from the readings, compare and contrast the 2008 and 2016 presidential election campaign tactics by reviewing one Democratic ad and one Republican ad from each election (four ads overall). Remember to analyze the ads. Don’t simply describe them. (Because you will link to your ads, the rest of us can see for ourselves what they looked like). Leave out personal opinions, and stick to facts and concepts in the readings, which also should be cited where appropriate. Here are some web sources which you might want to consult: http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/ http://pcl.stanford.edu/campaigns/ http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/

****Please pay attention to instructions, they are very specific***** This is a review of an article that I have attached. Please please read and respond in an appropriate manner that is defined in the below description Article reviews are limited to TWO PAGES so you’ll need to use them wisely. I have put together this guide to help you make the most of your space. The structure of your review should include the following sections: Introduction Section The length of an introduction is usually a single paragraph, and this section briefly explains the topic of the article. Begin by providing initial identification of the article and an indication of the major aspects of the article you will be discussing. This should be a short paragraph, and your junior high English teacher might even argue that this isn’t long enough to be a real paragraph. Article Summary Section This section presents a precise summary of the article’s main claims, findings, and arguments. Discuss the main aim of the article and summarize the main finding or key argument(s). Conclude this section with a brief statement of your evaluation of the article. This can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response. Your opinion statement should provide the segue from this section to the Assessment section. The summary should only make up about a third of the critical review. You need to present the author’s argument clearly and objectively summarized so that your reader can recognize the theoretical approach and the range of material covered. Assessment Section The critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the article. Remember to base your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference or use examples). In this section you are required to question the information and opinions in the article and present your evaluation or judgment of the main themes of the article. Provide a critical discussion of the key issues raised in the article. In this section you need to clearly present the author main points or arguments before you express your own opinion. In this section, you need to indicate the main position or claim that your review will make in response to the article, and try to use relevant examples to support your arguments. You need to develop your review in relation to aspects of the article, offering thoughtful, well-supported proof for your claim(s) (examples). Make sure to provide reasons for your agreement or disagreement of the article supported by relevant example, theoretical framework or your own relevant working experience. If you are wondering how long should this section be, I’d estimate it ought to take up about half your paper. Conclusion Section Final evaluation of the overall contribution that the article has made to your understanding of the topic (and maybe its importance to the development of knowledge in this particular area or discipline. It should summarize the main points made in the assessment section on each of the main points. Other thoughts The majority of the two allotted pages should be comprised of the Article Summary and Article Assessment sections with the assessment section being the longer of the two. DO NOT use the first or second person in your write up. The Introduction and Conclusion should be short and sweet. I have attached a blank template formatted just the way I like it for you to use in writing your article responses. Please do not try to improve upon my formatting. Use it for your write up and submit it when you are done.

For thi literature essay you MUST write on one Restoration comedy (The Country Wife or The Man of Mode) and you MUST NOT write on the text used for your critical analysis. Please note that for questions which specifically ask you to consider Restoration comedy you should only write on The Country Wife and The Man of Mode. Questions which ask you to consider Early Modern Comedy can be answered by referring to Shakespearean plays and/or Restoration plays. The question is, Discuss the role of master and servant relationships in Early Modern comedy. ♣ Demonstrate that you have paid careful attention to and given detailed consideration to the question taking particular care to ensure that you have understood and are addressing its precise wording. This means that if you are uncertain about the meaning of some terms you should seek to clarify them with the use of a good dictionary and/or by consulting the module tutor. ♣ Provide a clear, relevant and coherent argument. It is not enough to put down a series of points, these have to be structured into a logical sequence in which point a) can be seen to relate to point b) and so on. The argument must also be consistently relevant to the question and not stray into other issues which it does not ask you to consider. It is important to keep the question in mind throughout and ask yourself if your argument is addressing it. An essay is a rhetorical act of persuasion, the more coherent your argument, the more convincing your case will be. If the reader cannot follow the stages in your argument they will be less convinced that you properly understand the issues you are addressing and you will lose marks as a consequence. ♣ Display original and independent thought. Whilst it is expected that your essay should demonstrate that you have understood arguments and ideas presented to you in lectures and seminars simply repeating what you have been told on a topic is not sufficient at degree level. Good work is characterised by the ability to think independently in response to the framework provided by the module. That means you will be rewarded for having insights and perspectives which you have developed independently. ♣ Quote extensively from the primary texts you are considering to illustrate your points and follow the advice (below) on how to reference Shakespeare’s plays. ♣ Write as clearly and fluently as possible adopting an appropriate academic style: avoid colloquialism, abbreviated forms (etc, ie, eg) and aim for a formal but not over-ornate style. Your written expression in assessed work should not be like conversational speech but as close as you can get to the critical works you read on Shakespeare. In semester two of level one you need to be working to develop a good prose style and you will get much better marks if you are able to display this effectively. ♣ Demonstrate an appropriate engagement with a range of relevant secondary sources (critical and contextual work of an appropriate scholarly standard). ♣ Give proper acknowledgement of and proper references for other people’s work. Please recognise that a failure to properly acknowledge when you are drawing on the work of others, even if you have put this into your own words, can result in a charge of plagiarism which could result in your work being very severely penalised (awarded a fail mark) and in some circumstances may result in you having to withdraw from the Course. ♣ Present your work properly in accordance with the Essential Style Guide (see the MyBeckett page for Early Modern Comedy for a copy of the Essential Style Guide). Worth 80% of overall mark

A career in IT requires an understanding of the various technologies that compose a computing environment. Managing computer hardware and software is the first step. Whether you are an IT project manager, administrator (computer system, database or network), systems analyst, network specialist, software developer, digital investigator or security analyst, there may be a time when you need to administer your system, or help others administer theirs. Please refer to the following for information about accessing and using LabSim: Getting Started with LabSim LabSim Navigation Click here for the instructions for the Unit 5 Lab tasks. Prepare a Word document that contains 1-2 pages of information summarizing your thoughts about the following bullets. Explain the relationship between “code of ethics” and “professionalism” in an IT environment. Describe your thoughts about what “professionalism” would mean to someone who is in the role of network administrator. How would that compare to someone who was a systems analyst or a programmer? There are often reports of unprofessional acts by someone in IT that have significant implications for organizations. Research reports of unprofessional behavior by someone in IT and discuss whether their behavior was unethical, illegal, or socially responsible. One such example would be data theft by an employee. One example of this type of unprofessional behavior could be found here. You can find other examples at this website. Discuss an example situation of someone in an IT role that lacked professionalism or violated a “code of ethics”. Identify whether your example was socially, ethically or legally irresponsible. Prepare your work in a Word document using Times New Roman 12 point font, APA style (title page, abstract, citations, and references) with valid scholarly resources.

Generate a list of the 5 television shows that you watch often (Netflix counts) and write a brief description of each show (to include): What is it about? (Brief about 4 sentences) Do these shows adequately depict society? Why are they appealing? How do these shows reflect the norms and values of society? How has your television tastes changed over time? Why?

PHD. Critical Thinking and Analysis Exercise. (2 Case- Studies) Part I: Specific Instructions: 1. Read Chapters 1, 2 and 3 in Joseph Nye, The Powers to Lead. 2. Conduct background research on two significant leaders of history (any era). One leader should be examined using the concept of soft power, and one leader should be examined using the concept of hard power. Analyze and assess their application of these concepts of leadership and power. Use specific circumstances to support your position—such as his/her implementation of soft or hard power tactics/skills. *Cite your sources! 3. This exercise should be completed within a 2- page response, double spaced, in 12 pt. times roman font. Part II: 1. Read Chapter 4, Joseph Nye, The Powers to Lead, and research and read articles on key leaders who have integrated (real or in their philosophy) the use of the concept of Smart Power: General Petraeus was heard discussing Smart Power in a testimony to Congress. Information Material: Read more on Dr. Nye’s and other’s work with the Hard, Soft, Smart Power concepts: This link will help get you started: https://fortyninthparalleljournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/1-cammack-smart-power.pdf 2. Conduct background research on a key leader at any level (Commissioner of Police, or Prisons, Secretary of State….etc.) Analyze and assess their implementation of the concept of smart power. Use specific circumstances to support your position. 3. Leading research questions: What was the nature of the case study relevant to Smart Power? How did they integrate the concept? Why did they integrate the concept? Why did it work, or fail to work? How would you have approached the situation differently? *Cite your sources

you must write about either T. S. Eliot The Waste Lane. In this assignment you will demonstrate your understanding of the theories studied by discussing them in relation to a text. This task gives you the freedom to write about what you find interesting, but your essay should do the following: Discuss the essays/extracts by Roland Barthes called ‘ the death of the author’ and Wolfgang Isers work called ‘ interaction between text and reader’. Include some references from  Barry, P. (1995) ‘Structuralism’. In Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 39–60.  Bennet, A. and Royle, N. (3rd ed., 2004) ‘The Author’. In An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory. Harlow: Longman, pp. 18-26.  Have challenged your own assumptions about authors. Be beginning to understand Barthes’ argument and finding your own response to it.  Be able to discuss Barthes argument with a literary text (The Waste Land). Offer close sustained reading on the waste land and show impeccable knowledge on all 3 text.

Overview: “Personal Philosophy of Nursing” In this module’s Nursing Paper , you will draft a formal paper expressing your personal philosophy of nursing paper. In this paper, you will provide a framework for your personal practice of nursing and reflect on why you chose nursing as a profession. Your paper will define how you interact with patients, family members, other nurses, and other health care professionals. Performance Objectives • Compose a personal philosophy of nursing. • Correlate historical, ethical, and/or political factors influencing professional nursing practice with what you believe the core of nursing is and should be. • Apply professional practice standards. • Use correct grammar, punctuation, and American Psychological Association (APA) format in writing professional papers.

A career in IT requires an understanding of the various technologies that compose a computing environment. Managing computer hardware and software is the first step. Whether you are an IT project manager, administrator (computer system, database or network), systems analyst, network specialist, software developer, digital investigator or security analyst, there may be a time when you need to administer your system, or help others administer theirs. Please refer to the following for information about accessing and using LabSim: Getting Started with LabSim LabSim Navigation Click here for the instructions for the Unit 5 Lab tasks. Prepare a Word document that contains 1-2 pages of information summarizing your thoughts about the following bullets. Explain the relationship between “code of ethics” and “professionalism” in an IT environment. Describe your thoughts about what “professionalism” would mean to someone who is in the role of network administrator. How would that compare to someone who was a systems analyst or a programmer? There are often reports of unprofessional acts by someone in IT that have significant implications for organizations. Research reports of unprofessional behavior by someone in IT and discuss whether their behavior was unethical, illegal, or socially responsible. One such example would be data theft by an employee. One example of this type of unprofessional behavior could be found here. You can find other examples at this website. Discuss an example situation of someone in an IT role that lacked professionalism or violated a “code of ethics”. Identify whether your example was socially, ethically or legally irresponsible. Prepare your work in a Word document using Times New Roman 12 point font, APA style (title page, abstract, citations, and references) with valid scholarly resources.

Generate a list of the 5 television shows that you watch often (Netflix counts) and write a brief description of each show (to include): What is it about? (Brief about 4 sentences) Do these shows adequately depict society? Why are they appealing? How do these shows reflect the norms and values of society? How has your television tastes changed over time? Why?