Posted on

HEA230 Assessment 3 Media: Topic: Critically analyse the role and power of the Australian media in influencing and impacting on healthcare in multicultural Australian society

Marking Criteria HEA230 Assessment 3
Media: Topic:
Critically analyse the role and power of the Australian media in influencing and impacting on healthcare in multicultural Australian society
Word limit 2000 – 2500

Student Name: Student Number:
Grading Criteria Score 
1.      Role and Power of Media
·         Critically analysed the role and power of the current Australian media
 		 /8
2.      Influence of The Media
·         Considered the influence of the media in relation to culturally safe health care
 		 /8
3.      Critical Analysis of Media Items
·         Investigated two media items that demonstrate their potential influence on cultural safety in health care (one positive impact and one a potentially negative impact). NB Use the media items that you  attached in Appendix A & B
 		 /12
 
4.      Use of the Literature
·         Argument is supported by the relevant academic literature.
·         Paper contains at least 10 refereed publications published between 2006-2016.
 		 /4
Presentation
·         Presented using an accepted academic structure (Introduction, body, conclusion, reference list and appendix).
·         Font as requested – (Times New Roman 12 and line spacing 1.5
·         The submission file labelled as requested.
·         Correct academic English
·         Within the stated word limit.		 /4
5.      Referencing
·         References (In text and reference list) cited according to CDU APA Version 6.
 		 /4
Total Score for Assessment 3
 		 40

Comments
 

Posted on

CNA423 Introduction to Quality Health Services: Assessment task 2 Research Report

CNA423 Introduction to Quality Health Services: Assessment task 2 Research Report 45% 2,000 words
Report Section Performance Indicators
HD DN CR PP NN
In your research report you
wrote an:
In your research report you
wrote an::
In your research report you
wrote an::
In your research report you
wrote an::
In your research report you
wrote an::
Outline context,
background and
purpose.
Identify problem
and/or processes to be
improved
Excellent summary of
the context, background
and problem. Excellent
statement of the
research report’s
purpose.
Overview of the context,
background and
problem. Clear
statement of the
research report’s
purpose.
Description of
background and
problem, with a
statement of the
research report’s
purpose.
The required material is
present and meets the
stated requirements for
the research report.
The context,
background and
problem identification
are absent or
superficially addressed.
Stakeholders’ needs
and PEST influences
Excellent summary of
stakeholders’ needs
and excellent PEST
analysis.
Good summary of
stakeholders’ needs
and good PEST
analysis.
Solid summary of
stakeholders’ needs
and PEST analysis.
Summary of
stakeholders’ needs
and PEST analysis
present but lack depth.
Summary of
stakeholders’ needs
and PEST analysis are
superficial or not
appropriate for the
report topic.
Define and quantify a
gap between current
practice and one or
two criteria selected
from one NSQHS
standard
Excellent definition and
quantification of gap(s).
Two or more
perspectives (macro,
meso, micro) evident.
Qualitative and
quantitative measures
included with
traceability and
justification of claims.
Good definition and
quantification of gap(s).
Two or more
perspectives (macro,
meso, micro) evident.
Qualitative and
quantitative measures
included.
Clear definition and
quantification of gap(s).
Two or more
perspectives (macro,
meso, micro) evident.
Measures clearly
evident.
Adequate definition and
quantification of a gap.
One or more
perspectives (macro,
meso, micro) evident.
Definition and
quantification of gap
absent or poorly
developed. Use of one
or more perspectives
(macro, meso, micro)
not evident.
Identify opportunities
to reduce the gap
between current
performance and the
standard in one
location
Excellent identification
of opportunities to
reduce gap(s) between
current performance
and standard. Ranking
of opportunities with
consideration of
benefits, difficulty,
Good identification of
opportunities to reduce
gap(s) between current
performance and
standard. Clear ranking
based on benefits and
difficulty of
implementation.
Clear identification of
opportunities to reduce
gap(s) between current
performance and
standard with some
discussion ranking
based on difficulty of
implementation.
Adequate identification
of opportunities to
reduce gap(s) between
current performance
and standard.
Inadequate
identification of
opportunities to reduce
gap(s) between current
performance and
standard.
timing and costs.
Discussion of
anticipated benefits of
opportunities
identified and
potential difficulties
of implementation
Excellent discussion of
anticipated benefits of
opportunities identified
and potential difficulties
of implementation
Good discussion of
anticipated benefits of
opportunities identified
and potential difficulties
of implementation
Clear discussion of
anticipated benefits of
opportunities identified
and potential difficulties
of implementation
Adequate discussion of
anticipated benefits of
opportunities identified
and potential difficulties
of implementation
Inadequate discussion
of anticipated benefits
of opportunities
identified and potential
difficulties of
implementation
Recommended next
step(s) based on the
research evidence
Excellent
recommendations for
next step(s), strongly
linked to research
evidence.
Good recommendations
for next step(s), clearly
linked to research
evidence.
Sound
recommendations for
next step(s), with some
links to research
evidence
Recommendations for
next step(s), with some
links to research
evidence
Recommendations for
next step(s) are absent,
or have no links to
research evidence
Presentation and
structure of research
report
Beautiful writing style
with careful attention
given to formatting,
spelling and grammar.
Excellent coverage of
references which have
been correctly cited.
Correct report writing
conventions used.
Nicely written
submission with
attention given to
spelling and grammar.
Most of the submission
has been correctly
referenced and a good
amount of external
sources have been
used. Mostly correct
report writing
conventions used.
Writing style is fine but
more attention needed
to ensure clarity of
expression. A good
start to referencing but
more attention needed
to style and amount
referenced. Report
writing convention used
is good but needs more
attention to detail.
Difficulty in following
logic of argument.
Needs further work in
articulating argument.
Referencing is of
concern. Report writing
conventions are not
appropriately followed.
The writing style is
confusing and little
attention has been
given to presentation
including spelling and
grammar. Referencing
is of major concern.
Report writing
conventions are not
followed.

Posted on

Ethics and Law Writing

You are the Chief Executive of a Local Health Network is New South Wales.  E is a patient in one of your hospitals. E had suffered from anorexia since her early teens, brought about by serious sexual abuse which she experienced between the ages of 4 and 11. Despite the challenges of her illness, she was universally described as intelligent and articulate and had completed several years of a medical degree at university before her illness rendered it impossible to continue. She had undergone a number of admissions for medical and psychiatric care, including legislative sectioning on about 10 occasions. In July 2016 E signed a document saying that she did not want to be resuscitated or to be given any medical intervention to prolong her life, assisted by her mother.
In October 2016, she signed another advance directive in a standard form, while admitted in hospital. Following her discharge and return to the community, a familiar pattern re-asserted itself. By early 2017 E was drinking very heavily. She was re-detained in March 2017 and was initially fed by tube but opposed this and tube feeding was stopped. As a result, she has not been taking any calories at all since the end of March. On 20 April 2017 E was admitted to a community hospital for palliative care and placed on an ‘end of life’ care pathway with high doses of opiate medication, to which she is physically addicted.
E has been diagnosed as suffering from a very rare triad of anorexia, alcoholism and personality disorder. Her parents, although not wanting E to die, did not support any further medical intervention unless there was a real prospect of success. E’s treating doctors are doubtful about further coercive treatment. The NSW Health Solicitor has been instructed by you and she has relied on the advice of an expert, who advised that highly specialized treatment was available, which had not been tried, that although not without significant risk might return E to relatively normal life. The treatment involves a number of medical interventions including forcible feeding and using chemical sedation.
The Department of Health, on your behalf, has applied to the NSW Supreme Court in its parens patriae jurisdiction for orders on how to proceed.
What do you think will be the outcome of this application? In addressing this issue, include the following:
 

  1. Does E have the capacity and were her attempts to make binding advance care directives valid? (10 marks)
  1. What are the ethical factors and legal principles that you, as a health service manager, would apply in balancing the value of Es life on one hand and the value of her personal independence on the other? (10 marks)
  2. Assess the ethical principles and legal obligations that you, as a health service manager, will need to consider in managing your team treating E, some of whom may object to the way the matter proceeds, and the treatment provided to E. (10 marks)
Posted on

Case study: The Chunnel Project-BUSM 4610 Business Project Management

You can order a custom essay, term paper, research paper, thesis or dissertation on “Case study: The Chunnel Project-BUSM 4610 Business Project Management” at our professional custom essay writing service which provides students with custom papers written by highly qualified academic writers. High quality and no plagiarism guarantee! Get professional essay writing help at an affordable cost.
Assignment submission steps:
Step1: A draft copy (completed answer of at least two questions) of the assignment is due on Oct 6 2017
(11PM). There are no marks for that however it is mandatory to track student’s progress. Please upload
the report on assignment submission folder: under Assignment 3 >Assignment 3-DRAFT Submission
Step 2:
Final Report due date: Final copy of report (softcopy) is due by 11PM, October 19, 2017
Report submission:
1. Submit your report through assignment-3 submission folder of blackboard. You will see
your Tutor’s name is available on the folder.
2. Students will also upload the same soft copy of the project to Turnitin – assignment-3
Turnitin submission
23
Case study: ‘The Chunnel Project’
Total marks: 60 (will be prorated to 30%)
Length: Word limit 2500-2600 words
The report will be evaluated based on the following outline:
1. Executive summary (brief): Clearly outlines the objective of the project, justification to start the
project, findings/lesson learned and recommendations. (5 marks)
2. Introduction (brief): It clearly demonstrates project brief, the purpose of the report, key terms/issues
you are going to discuss and the report structure. (5 marks)
3. Project Appraisal/Body: (Answer the following questions) 40 marks (=5×8 questions)
Questions:
1. Was the project scope defined clearly at early stage of the project? Identify one major scope
change throughout the project life and discuss the effects of changes on project performance. (5
marks)
2. Describe the roles and performance of project management office as used by the Chunnel
project. (5 marks)
3. Evaluate project performance in terms of cost and schedule. Identify the main causes of cost and
schedule variations in the Chunnel project. (5 marks)
4. What would you have done when you saw that the project would not meet its schedule?
Rationalize the use of fast tracking in the Chunnel project. (5 marks)
5. How did the Chunnel project handle risks at different phases of project life cycle? What more
might they have done? Discuss. (5 marks)
6. Why is stakeholder involvement so critical in a project? Who are the key stakeholders in the
project and briefly identify two major stakeholder’s power and interests in the project? (5 marks)
7. “There must be one contract, it must be developed and written in one language, and it must be
based on one legal system”. Rationalise the choice of different contracts (example: fixed-price,
cost-plus fixed-fee) in the Chunnel project. Describe what specific things you must watch out for
during contract administration for each of the following contracts: fixed-price, cost-plus fixed-fee.
(5 marks)
8. Highlight the major opportunities for improvement in the management of this project? Document
the lessons learned from this project and provide recommendations. (5 marks)
Others: Overall presentation (all topics are clearly explained, easy to follow/clarity of language,
coverage and completeness, page numbers, table of contents), use of references and citation,
conciseness: 10 marks

Posted on

PAD 2016 Assignment 4: Literature review (relating to a proposal for a research or development project)

PAD 2016 Assignment 4:  Literature review (relating to a proposal for a research or development project)
 
This task requires you to review a minimum of 10 sources of information (eg. articles, books) related to a specific issue in your field of study (This can be the same issue as in Assignments 1 and 2).
 
The proposal can be either for a research project or an evaluation of a procedure or equipment (or of a new technology or software).
 
Proposal for a research project
Your introduction should describe what the proposal is about and provide a clear outline.
You should then critically summarise the sources and show how they are related to the project.  The review forms the rationale for your research.  Therefore, it should conclude by stating the gap in the literature and identify in more detail the area/s, which need further investigation.
 
Proposal evaluating a procedure, equipment, new technology or software
Your introduction should describe the procedure, equipment, new technology or software to be evaluated and a clear outline of the proposal. You could also include a statement explaining why the procedure/technology is significant. You should then critically evaluate the procedure/technology, for example by discussing its applications and implementation, costs/benefits etc and drawing on relevant articles and reports in the field. You should conclude by identifying potential areas of further development or research.
 
All sources of information should be suitably acknowledged in the body of the proposal and in the list of references.
 
 
Length:                                    2000- 2500 words
 
Mark allocation:                      40%
 
Due dates
 
ANNOTATED first draft:    Friday 13 October (Week 11)
 
Final draft                               Monday 30 October
 


Assessment Criteria for Assignment 4
 
 

Structure     ·         The introduction contains relevant background to the issue, a clear thesis statement (or rationale for the proposal) and an outline of the paper.
·         There are clear links between the major sections, between and within paragraphs.
·         Section headings are specific and appropriate.
·         The conclusion summarises the main points and highlights areas that need further research/investigation.
Content ·         Main arguments/claims are clearly developed.
·         Claims/arguments are supported by relevant research or reference to published reports.
·         There is evidence of critical engagement with the ideas and/or with the cited research.
·         There is evidence of synthesis of sources.
Vocabulary ·         There is a good range of vocabulary used.
·         The text is written in an academic register.
·         Vocabulary is used appropriately.
Grammar ·         The text is grammatically accurate.
·         There is a good range of sentence structures, including complex sentences where appropriate.
Referencing ·         A sufficient number of references are used (ie no over-reliance on one text).
·         Quotes, paraphrases and summaries of references are used appropriately.
·         References used are correctly acknowledged in the text.
·         References used are correctly set out in the list of references.

 
 

Posted on

BSBADM503: Assessment 2

What you have to do

For this assignment you will have to produce a report which addresses the conference follow up and recommendations for improvement. It is important that you use standard business report layout including:

  • a title page
  • table of contents
  • introduction
  • body of report (side headings and information)
  • conclusion
  • recommendations
  • appendices (attachments, such as sample survey form)

 
 
Task
Look back on the conference you planned in Assessment 1. Think about what could have gone wrong in your conference plans and reflect on what could be improved.

What you have to do

For this assessment you will be required to produce a report which addresses the conference follow up and makes recommendations for improvement.
For the purpose of this assessment assume that changes were made to the conference program due to unforeseen circumstances.
 
The report must include the following five (5) items:
 
1) Details of changes to the conference program, including:

  • the special needs of participants addressed, for example dietary and access requirements
  • what action was taken to address these needs
  • session time and location changes
  • additional catering requirements
  • speaker cancellation

 
 
 
 
2) The report must also present simulated results of the evaluation survey developed in Assessment 1:

  • Select survey questions which can be easily presented in a graph and include this graph in the report.
  • Discuss the results of the survey in the body of the report

 
3) A discussion of the changes made to the budget, including:

  • Additional or reduced expenses
  • Unexpected costs

Also include an updated and final budget as an Appendix.
 
4) Recommendations for improvement to assist in the success of future conferences.
 
5) A sample completed evaluation form from a conference participant as an Appendix.
 
 
 

Checklist

I have:

  • completed all parts of the report
  • included a sample survey response

 
If you are unable to complete this task for a specific reason, please contact your teacher to discuss alternative arrangements for demonstrating your skills and knowledge.
 
 
 

Posted on

BUSS 2054 – Principles of Logistics and Supply Chain Management

BUSS 2054 – Principles of Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Study Period 5 2017
Assessment Task 2:  Formal Report
1700 words (35% of total grade)
Your task is to address the following questions for a medical supply chain. You can read the given case study document, which is available from your Learnonline course site as an E-reading, or any other relevant information for this situation. Critically review the information and answer the following four (4) questions for this given case study in the discussion section.
 
The questions to be addressed in your discussion section are:

1.       Describe the challenges of medical logistics within the context of logistics and supply chain management,

2.       Describe and discuss the roles of logistics management in supply chain and operations management for medical logistics and in general practice,

3.       Discuss the essential trade-offs in meeting the performance goals while minimising total costs in medical logistics context and in general practice,

4.       Explain and discuss the role of logistics management or logisticians in medical logistics and supply chain in providing value to stakeholders.

Then provide recommendations on how these challenges faced by producers of medical devices and pharmaceutical organisations can be resolved

 

References:                                                                                                                                                       Provide a minimum of six (6) academic references (preferably no older than 2005).                                                            Four (4) of these must be refereed (peer reviewed or scholarly) academic journal articles.

Referencing style:

Please review the assessment help information prepared by the Library for your benefit at: http://guides.library.unisa.edu.au/c.php?g=169934&p=4997814
 

Use the Harvard UniSA referencing style in all your assessments. A guide to the Harvard UniSA style is found at:  http://unisa.libguides.com/content.php?pid=224578&sid=1889060

Word limit:                                                                                                                                                              1,700 words.  10% plus or minus the word limit is acceptable. The word limit only excludes the Executive summary and the list of references. If you exceed the 10% plus maximum limit, your grader will draw a line and will stop reading at that point.

Assignment template:                                                                                                                                          As an aid, there a template to help you format your answer (found at the end of this document).
Marking criteria:                                                                                                                                                    The assignment marking criteria sheet is provided on your learnonline space. Be guided by the criteria and mark weightings given to each aspect of this assignment.
Assignment submission:                                                                                                                              Submit your assignment online via Gradebook. Only word document (.doc or .docx) is accepted. Please do not submit a coversheet as it will affect your Turnitin score. Just write your name, student number and the assignment title on the front page of your assignment as in the provided template.  If you receive a high Turnitin score (above 15%- not including your reference section), please correct your assignment and save it with the same file name. Then re-submit your assignment via Gradebook.
Avoid the words “Bibliography” or ‘Reference List’ as headings only use “References” as a heading in order to help us reduce the Turnitin score matching the literature in your count.
Turnitin is a tool to help you learn to acknowledge (cite) the authors of your literature research and to acknowledge the words of other writers by using quotation marks “…”. See http://www.unisa.edu.au/ltu/integrity/default.asp
Late submission:                                                                                                                                             Please note that assignments submitted after the due date, without an authorised extension, will receive a penalty of 10% a day deducted from the total available mark for the assignment for up to 7 calendar days. After 7 calendar days, the assignment will not be marked.
Delete this section above (pages 1 & 2 of this document) – before submitting your Assignment 2 on or before 3rd October – 9 am (Up to 10 AM on 3rd October we may tolerate. After that late penalties will be applied ). The link for submission will be available from 15th August.
 
Non deletion of these two pages (and other red coloured sentences in pages 3 to 6 of this document) will count towards your word count and will increase the Turnitin score! as well.
 
Please note: Not deleting the first two pages of this document and other red-coloured sentences in your submission will incur a reduction of marks (up to 10%).
 
 
Assessment Task 2 Template
(Use this template as a guide to format your assignment. This template is not compulsory)
Please delete all sections in red from this template before submission)
 
BUSS 2054 – Principles of Logistics and Supply Chain Management
 
Study Period 5 2017
 
Assessment Task 2: Formal Report
 
1700 words
 
 
Student Full Name
Student ID Number
 
 
Note –         –   all answers must be supported by literature evidence. This is a suggested template only, and you are free to choose any headings that are appropriate for this assignment.
(Please delete this section and all sections in red font from the template before submission)

Executive summary

This section contains a synopsis of your full report– 100 to 150 words (only maximum of 150 words – do not count towards your word count.)  Complete/finalise this section last. This section should also clearly express the identified issues of Logistics and Supply Chain management in your given case study within two to three sentences. Although this section does not contribute to your word count, however, the marker will not read more than 150 words.

Introduction

This section contains a statement of the point of view that you have developed in response to the Case study (sometimes called the thesis statement) – 150 to 200 words– (write this Introduction, Executive summary and the conclusion sections- once you have answered all the other sections. Doing so will enable you to write good sentences that summarise your answer). Basically, it is a short summary of introducing the case study responses in your own words. All sentences in your report are to be clear and well written without any grammatical or spelling mistakes. Your report should be extremely well written with UK or Australian spelling- avoid the Microsoft default US spelling in some of your word software. Use appropriate headings and subheadings to highlight the reader your logical structure of your analysis in all sections of this report. Clarity of some sentences can be improved by avoiding “this”,” it’ etc. at the start of the sentence.
 

Background and business environment (or any appropriate sub heading of your preferences)

In this section, you will illustrate your in-depth understating on this case study and the issues (about 200 to 250 words; 2-4 paragraphs) clearly, adequately, concisely and comprehensively with a good structure. You will relate these discussions with a good reflection on your course content from Topics 1 to 10, whichever is appropriate. You may have a few separate headings for these discussions in this section as well. Having better and shorter headings for these sections will be counted towards “2.2. Logical planning and sequence” on your feedback form.
 

Discussion Question 1 (or any appropriate sub heading of your preference- e.g. Hospital/ Medical logistics Challenges)

In this section you will describe and discuss the challenges the medical organisations facing in the context of logistics management and supply chain management in relations to this case study context and in general practice with examples (about 225 to 250 words; 2-4 paragraphs).
Having a better and shorter heading for these four (4) discussion sections will be counted towards “4.1.Overall presentation” on your feedback form. Please do not use this section heading as “Discussion Question 1’ etc.; then you will get a poor grade for “4.1.Overall presentation”.
 

Discussion Question 2 (or any appropriate sub heading of your preference- e.g. Roles of Logistics and Supply Chain management in ~~~)

In this section, you will describe and discuss the rolls of logistics management and supply chain management in relations to this case study context and in general practice with examples (about 225 to 250 words; 2-4 paragraphs).
 

Discussion Question 3 (or any appropriate sub heading of your preference- e.g. Organisational performance trade-offs in ~)

Here, answer the discussion question within the context of case study and in general practice (about 225 to 250 words; 2-4 paragraphs). Strengths and weaknesses concisely and comprehensively discussed. The analysis should have references supporting clearly stated arguments.
 

Discussion Question 4 (or any appropriate sub heading of your preference- e.g. Role of logisticians ~ in adding value to ~)

In this section, you will describe and discuss how the role of the logistics management activities particularly in medical logistics and supply chain in adding value to the organisations such as NGO’s (Non-government organisations) and Governments.  You may critically compare and analyse the Hospitals supply chains with other business supply chain or other supply chains with examples (about 225 to 250 words; 2-4 paragraphs). Strengths and weaknesses concisely and comprehensively discussed. The analysis should have references supporting clearly stated arguments.
In all of your answers to these discussion questions, all ideas are to be linked and critically examined. You need to link theory and/or applications in your main discussion sections as well as in the recommendations.
 

Conclusion

This is where you will summarise what you have found through applying your literature research and the restatement of the overall point of view that has been developed in your own words. (About 250 words; 2 to 3 paragraphs). All arguments should be drawn into excellent conclusion, and the report has to have a good logical flow thus makes it as an interesting read. It is advisable to write the ‘Executive summary’ and the ‘Conclusion’ sections after you have completed the main body by answering all the discussion questions.
 

Recommendations

This section contains a summary of brief recommendations– maximum 200 words on how the challenges can be overcome or provide potential solutions for Hospital supply chain/ medical logistics issues (in relation to the Topics 2 to 10 of this course). You need to establish the rationale for the recommendations in your main body, and that rationale is to be supported by academic references as well.
Please note, Conclusions and recommendations should be written in individual sections, not summarised together.
Expected word count= 150+200+225*4 +250+200= 1700
 

References

Provide a minimum of eight (8) academic references (preferably no older than 2005).                                                            Four (4) of these must be refereed academic journal articles.  Do not use the wordings such as “Reference list” or “List of references” or “Bibliography” as this section heading. Then your references will be counted by Turnitin software as well. Only use the word “References.”

All in-text referencing needs to comply with the Harvard UniSA Referencing System.              If you are unsure how to use this system, you can find the Harvard UniSA Referencing guide at http://unisa.libguides.com/content.php?pid=224578&sid=1889060
Or
http://roadmap.unisa.edu.au/

Posted on

Reinforced Concrete Design (AS3600 Compliant)

(AS3600 compliant)

General Rubric for Design Project-Final Report (Individual-40%) SEV300 – Reinforced Concrete Design
Dr Riyadh Al-Ameri SEV300 – Design Project Rubric
Page 1 of 2
Criteria Level5 Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1 Presentation and production (25%)
1. Complete & concise report, incl. cover sheet, introduction, TOC & page numbers. Scope and assumptions are clear and appropriate.
2. Clear, load summary sketches provided.
3. Clear, separate sections are used and presented in logical sequence.
4. Clear design summary sketches provided as design conclusions.
5. Comply with the minimum words limit.
Submission displays elements of Level 5 and Level 3.
1. Report is not concise or is partially incomplete. Scope and assumptions are unclear or inappropriate in places.
2. Load summary sketches are unclear or incomplete.
3. Separate working steps are evident but unclear or out of sequence.
4. Incomplete design summary sketches are provided.
5. Close to the minimum words limit.
Submission displays elements of Level 3 and Level 1.
1. Report is incomplete and missing significant parts. Scope and assumptions not included or mostly incorrect.
2. Load summary sketches not included.
3. Separate sections or logical sequence are not evident.
4. Design summary sketches have not been provided.
5. The minimum words limit has not been met.
Scientific content (50%)
1. Loads and input data are correct and correctly applied.
2. Effective use of calculations, diagrams and written word.
3. Calculations shown in full with units and appropriate use of significant figures.
4. Analysis of allocated elements is complete, correct and includes clear action diagrams.
Submission displays elements of Level 5 and Level 3.
1. Loads and input data are unclear or incorrectly applied.
2. Diagrams and written word not used effectively.
3. Calculations not shown in full with units and significant figures used inappropriately.
4. Analysis of allocated elements contains significant errors, action diagrams are
Submission displays elements of Level 3 and Level 1.
1. Loads and input data not shown or applied adequately.
2. Ineffective use of calculations, diagrams and written word.
3. Working and units typically not shown.
4. Analysis of allocated elements is mostly incorrect, action diagrams not included, critical actions not identified.
General Rubric for Design Project-Final Report (Individual-40%) SEV300 – Reinforced Concrete Design
Dr Riyadh Al-Ameri SEV300 – Design Project Rubric
Page 2 of 2
Critical actions have been identified
5. Design of allocated elements are in accordance with AS3600.
6. Design addresses min strength and bar spacing limits.
7. Strength, stability, & serviceability checks shown clearly and correctly.
poor, important critical actions not identified.
5. Some design of allocated elements are not as per AS3600.
6. Min strength and bar spacing limits addressed but incorrect.
7. Strength, stability, & serviceability checks include significant errors.
5. Majority of allocated elements design are not as per AS3600.
6. Min strength or bar spacing limits not addressed.
7. Strength, stability, & serviceability checks not included or mostly incorrect.
Results and outcomes (25%)
1. Member strengths adequate for all critical actions.
2. Serviceability and stability checks are complete & correct.
3. Reinforcement & detailing as per Australian standards.
4. Reflection considers design limitations and identifies potential improvements.
Submission displays elements of Level 5 and Level 3.
1. Member strengths adequate for most critical actions.
2. Serviceability and stability checks are incomplete or contain errors.
3. Reinforcement or detailing not as per Australian standards.
4. Reflection does not adequately consider design limitations or identify potential improvements.
Submission displays elements of Level 3 and Level 1.
1. Member strengths typically inadequate.
2. Serviceability and stability are not checked.
3. Reinforcement & detailing not as per Australian standards.
4. Reflection not included or does not address design limitations or potential improvements.
overall Level5 Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1
Shear wall, Beam A and Column 2 as circled above are to be designed, as well as a footing of your choice. And Slab 2 is to be analysed. Loadings will be provided. Assumptions can be made for whatever is needed so long the designs and calculations are shown and follow AS3600.