In the Ten Principles video Dr. Todd Buchholz and Dr. Caroline Hoxby debated the very existence of the Phillips Curve-research paper

In the Ten Principles video Dr. Todd Buchholz and Dr. Caroline Hoxby debated the very existence of the Phillips Curve.
Dr. Hoxby indicated she was taking bets that the Phillips Curve is alive and well. The problem may just be that it moves around and possibly changes shape occasionally.
Policy makers like Congress and the Federal Reserve seek to steer the US economy to a sweet spot where we have low unemployment and only moderate inflation. The Phillips Curve is supposed to describe the trade-off between higher inflation and lower unemployment. Does it?
(READ THE FOLLOWING )
http://www.businessinsider.com/phillips-curve-us-japan-larry-hatheway-gam-2017-6
A hotly debated topic on the US economy is the collapsed relationship between unemployment and inflation.
The traditional Phillips curve purports that when unemployment falls, inflation should rise, since more workers with jobs will increase demand in a stronger economy and that should lift prices.
But the US unemployment is at a 16-year low, and inflation is going nowhere.
Larry Hatheway, the chief economist at GAM, an asset manager with about $130 billion, looks to Japan as another case study.
“It’s been fashionable for 25 years or so to dismiss Japan,” Hatheway said at a media briefing on Wednesday.
“It’s always been thought of as somewhat unique, not the place that one goes to to learn the lessons of economics.”
But perhaps not in this instance.
“The number of job openings relative to the number of applicants in Japan is back to levels last seen in 1974,” Hatheway said. Although a similar data series in the US — the job-openings rate — dates back to only 2000, it’s at record levels and is suggestive of full employment, Hatheway said.
“We’ve even exceeded levels seen in the 1990s and there’s not a whisper of wage inflation in Japan to speak of, much less pass-through to underlying rates of inflation. The Phillips curve has undoubtedly collapsed in Japan.”
And perhaps it also has in the US — at least in the way that William Phillips, the New Zealand-born economist, first presented the idea in the 1950s.
Here’s the fundamental takeaway from all this: For central bankers who target price stability, like the Federal Reserve does, inflation should be less of a concern when the Phillips curve has collapsed like this. Although they are inclined to raise interest rates to cool the economy, they could let inflation to run a little longer and hotter, he said.

But has it collapsed?

Now, it’s worth noting that economists actually can’t agree on whether the Phillips curve has also collapsed in the US. Hatheway had a few ideas about why.
“The stability of inflation may have to do with the stability of long-term inflation expectations,” Hatheway said. One–year inflation expectations as measured by the University of Michigan’s consumer confidence survey have steadily fallen since the financial crisis.
“People aren’t necessarily asking for higher wages and companies aren’t necessarily using whatever leverage they may get as output markets tighten up to bid up prices because they themselves don’t expect inflation to accelerate,” Hatheway said.
Some workers still harbor insecurities about the labor market even nearly a decade after the financial crisis. “Whether individually or collectively through unions, job security is prized more than real income growth, Hatheway said. “People will bargain as such and that has a dampening effect on wages.”
Another explanation is that the growth of globalization is not as additive to economic growth as would have been expected.
China joining the World Trade Organization in 2001 stoked energy prices to levels that wouldn’t have been possible if the country did not open up. Today, however, globalization is not playing as big a role.
(PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING)

Macroeconomic characteristics and condition of your selected  country: Relevant metrics to investigate include GNP, GDP, GDP per  capita, unemployment, inflation, foreign exchange rates, and  international trade. You will probably find additional metrics of  interest. You may need to conduct additional research to better present  and discuss the information conveyed by each measure.

Course Project Check-in

Your facilitator has confirmed one of your choices of country for  your course project. Using the textbook, the Argosy University online  library resources, and the Internet, research your selected country. In  this course project task, research the following:

In order to prepare your 15- to 20-page research paper due in M5: Assignment 1,  prepare a draft of this portion of your paper. You will not submit the  paper in this module. It will form one component of the paper. Your  paper will include tables with relevant data (tables are not counted in  the 5–6 pages) and a careful discussion that guides the reader through  the tables and the conclusions that can be drawn from the tables.

Issues in the global economy-· Identify the factors/developments which contributed to the process of globalisation

15 slides presentation in due in 4 Hours.

Module Title: Issues in the global economy Module Code: 6WBS0002 SDL
Assignment Format & Maximum Word count Presentation Assignment Weighting: 30%
Coursework Submission: Time: 20:00 Date: 26.02.2018 Method: Electronically (StudyNet) Coursework return Date returned to students: Approx. 4 weeks after the deadline
Module lecturer Vida Keshtvarz First marker Vida Keshtvarz and Michael Kashioulis
Internal Moderator Approved Date: Module Board name
External Examiner Approved ☐ Date: Module Board date
Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding tested in this assignment:
· Identify the factors/developments which contributed to the process of globalisation
· Demonstrate awareness about the uneven distribution of gains associated with globalisation
Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes tested in this assignment:
· Identify and evaluate the merging economic challenges and opportunities presented by globalisation
· Deliver written and oral presentations in which selected issues are discussed on the basis of adequate level of research
Transformational Opportunities
· Ability to arrange and communicate effectively, both orally and in writing, qualitative and quantitative information
· Develop organisational skills for deadline submission
· Exploring the fundamental economic changes in the global economy
Feedback /Marking criteria for this Assignment
Performance will be assessed using HBS Grading Criteria and Mark schemeGuidance for improvement will be given in writing on the Assessment Feedback Form or on the StudyNet Feedback Form within 4 weeks of submission.
Assignments submitted up to one week late will receive a maximum numeric grade of: Levels 4, 5 and 6 (UG) – 40 Level 7 (PG) – 50 Plagiarism offences will receive standard penalties.
Detailed Brief for Individual/Group Assessment
Assignment Title: Individual presentation with narrated PowerPoints
Description of the assignment:
10 minutes presentation; discussing the following topic; make sure that you justify and well explain your points.
‘Identify and discuss the winners and losers from globalisation ’.
Any specific instructions:
· The length of each presentation must not be less than 9 minutes or more than 11 minutes.
· Any late submission would have standard penalty.
· The number of slides does not matter, the quality of your slides, the content and your presentation skills are what you will be marked on.
· Candidates need to submit their work on StudyNet before the deadline, which is Monday 26.02.2018 at 20:00.
· All submissions have to be in PowerPoints format.
· The submission can be made through the link in the assignment section.
· Candidates are required to include their student ID in the first slide of their presentation.
· Candidates are asked to allow enough time for uploading their work before the deadline.
Marking scheme:
Knowledge and Understanding For this you need to show that you have a good grasp of the broader context (provide evidence of wider reading). Your understanding of the topics involved will be judged based on the arguments you provide about the topic.
30%
Quality of Content For this you should show your ability to analyse the information and data you decide to use and make critical judgements and conclusions. You will need to provide relevant arguments to identify the winners and losers of globalisation. Concentrate on providing an in-depth conclusive analysis.
30%
Planning and Organisation This requires you to pay attention to the presentation structure, quality of slides, effective use of time and time management. No grammatical/spelling errors.
10%
Timing of Delivery This requires candidate(s) to keep to the allocated time and have an effective and reasonable pace while delivering the presentation.
10%
Clarity and Cohesion This requires you to present clear, understandable and logical discussion which sensibly follows on from what has gone before.
10%
Make sure that:
· The points written in the slides are clear and understandable.
· Slides are not too wordy.
· Care has been taken to order the slides by level of importance and relevance.
· The arguments are coherent and follow logically.
Referencing In order to produce a debate, you need to back up all your arguments by references, data, and evidence. The number of references is important, but so it is the quality/appropriateness of the references and the way you use them to support your arguments. Try to avoid using too many long quotes.
You will be expected to acknowledge your sources both in the slides and in a reference list at the end, both of which must conform to Harvard Standards.
10%
Please remember to follow Harvard protocol at all times. Please take extra care to follow Harvard protocol when referencing online sources (avoid making common mistakes).
For more details on the marking scheme, please see the last page of this document: Standard Assessment & Grading Criteria for HBS Coursework.
Student Support and Guidance
· For further help, you can contact the lecturer by email.
· Use the Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme to help improve your work.
· Go to Centre for Academic Skills Enhancement (CASE) workshops, use the CASE website and drop-in hours www.studynet.herts.ac.uk/go/CASE/. More information on this will be provided in-class.
· Academic English for Business support is available through daily drop-ins from the CASE office. See the CASE workshop timetable on the CASE main website page for details.
· Make full use of Library search to identify relevant academic material and the ‘Subject Toolkit for Business’ which contains links to other Information Databases and the Information Management contact details. (http://www.studynet1.herts.ac.uk/ptl/common/LIS.nsf/lis/4DAF5390094771C2802575ED004212BF)
· In this course students are required to submit their work (essay) on Turnitin. Guidance on submission to Turnitin via StudyNet can be found by using the following link. http://www.studynet1.herts.ac.uk/ptl/common/asu.nsf/resource+library/TURNITIN+FOR+STUDENTS+2016+USER+GUIDE.pdf/$FILE/TURNITIN+FOR+STUDENTS+2016+USER+GUIDE.pdf

Assessment Brief
Karen Robins – Updated November 2016

Standard Assessment & Grading Criteria for HBS Coursework: PowerPoint presentation

Module Code/ Title: PG1001 Pathway / Level: Pre-Masters
Student’s Name:
Title/Topic chosen: CW1 – Presentation
Presentation Date & Time: 01.11.2017 Time allocated to present: 15 minutes Time allocated for Q&A: 5 minutes
TICK APPROPRIATE GRADE BOX/TYPE THE MARK IN THE APPROPRIATE GRID 25-30m 20-25m 15-20m 10-15m 5-10m 0-5m
QUALITY OF CONTENT (60%)
Quality of Content/Analysis/Evaluation (30%)
· Focused on the task & addresses it
· Displays knowledge & understanding: Inclusion of appropriate/relevant theories; accurate/relevant application of data/theory/practice/examples
Knowledge and Understanding and Evidence of research (30%)
· Appropriate format for presenting written information
· Well written with good use of language and headings as appropriate
TICK APPROPRIATE GRADE BOX 10m 8m 6m 4m 2m 0m
DELIVERY (40%)
PLANNING/ORGANISATION OF MATERIAL/TOPICS and SUPPORT MATERIALS (e.g. PowerPoint slides, poster, etc) (10m)
· Coherent structure/organisation evident in the process/distribution between speakers
· Professional/business-like quality; clear images & ‘audience friendly’ i.e. use of colour/font/not overcrowded
· Interesting & attractive; appropriately used
TIMING OF DELIVERY (10m)
· Keeps to allocated time & effective pacing
Clarity and Cohesion (10m)
· Business-like style; rehearsed & smooth
· Logical sequence
· Articulate & fluent; language is clear & concise
Referencing (10m)
· Harvard referencing
OTHER COMMENTS/OVERALL IMPRESSION
Marks for Content Tutor: Moderator: Overall Agreed Mark Tutor Signature:
Second Signature:
Marks for Presentation Skill Tutor: Moderator:

The compelling reasons for Toyota, Nissan and Mini to have chosen Britain for manufacturing

British car manufacturing hit a record high in the first half of 2016 with firms such as Toyota, Nissan and Mini continuing to increase their output. Almost 80% of all of those automobiles were exported to the EU and to other nations outside of Britain. Your client, a well-known Korean car manufacturer, has contacted you for your advice regarding her plan to begin manufacturing vehicles in Britain at the start of next year. You will need to respond to her with:

  • The compelling reasons for Toyota, Nissan and Mini to have chosen Britain for manufacturing
    • Consider sources of comparative advantage, protectionism, dynamic gains from trade, regulatory policy, and the movement of the factors of production
  • The concerns over Britain’s decision to leave the EU and what this could mean for manufacturing and exporting
  • Your recommendation for whether or not she should go through with those plans. Your recommendation must be based upon factual evidence and should any include any concerns she should consider if she follows your advice.

Your response should follow APA guidelines and should include in-text citations and a reference page at the end of the document. Your response is likely to be 5-7 pages in length (double-spaced).

Your recommendation for whether or not she should go through with those plans. Your recommendation must be based upon factual evidence and should any include any concerns she she should consider if she follows your advice.

British car manufacturing hit a record high in the first half of 2016 with firms such as Toyota, Nissan and Mini continuing to increase their output. Almost 80% of all of those automobiles were exported to the EU and to other nations outside of Britain. Your client, a well-known Korean car manufacturer, has contacted you for your advice regarding her plan to begin manufacturing vehicles in Britain at the start of next year. You will need to respond to her with:

The compelling reasons for Toyota, Nissan and Mini to have chosen Britain for manufacturing

Consider sources of comparative advantage, protectionism, dynamic gains from trade, regulatory policy, and the movement of the factors of production

The concerns over Britain’s decision to leave the EU and what this could could mean for manufacturing and exporting

Your recommendation for whether or not she should go through with those plans. Your recommendation must be based upon factual evidence and should any include any concerns she she should consider if she follows your advice.

Your response should follow APA guidelines and should include in-text citations and a reference page at the end of the document. Your response is likely to be 5-7 pages in length (double-spaced).

U.S. Imposes New Tariffs, Ramping Up ‘America First’ Trade Policy-Discussion

Discuission

U.S. Imposes New Tariffs, Ramping Up ‘America First’ Trade Policy
The Trump administration said new barriers on solar panels and washing machines are aimed at protecting domestic production from cheap imports
By Jacob M. Schlesinger and Erin Ailworth Updated Jan. 22, 2018 10:26 p.m. ET WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump slapped steep tariffs on imports of solar panels
and washing machines, kicking off his second year in office by showing he is ready to start implementing his long-promised “America First” trade policy.
The moves were announced Monday in response to U.S. industry pleas for relief from a recent flood of cheap imports and are the first of what administration officials said would be a series of trade-enforcement actions in the coming months.
The tariffs are aimed mainly at Asian manufacturers—Chinese makers of solar panels and South Korean producers of washing machines. But the administration announced few exceptions for any countries, indicating a willingness to impose comprehensive new protec- tive policies for U.S. companies against global competition. The new curbs also would affect trading partners from Mexico and Canada to Europe.
“The president’s action makes clear again that the Trump administration will always de- fendAmericanworkers, farmers, ranchers, andbusinesses,” U.S. TradeRepresentativeRobert Lighthizer said in a statement.
The president plans to hold a signing ceremony of the measures in the Oval Office Tues- day, publicly touting his newlymuscular trade-enforcement policy three days before he plans to explain that approach to a skeptical audience at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
Specifically, the administration said it would impose tariffs on washing machines at a rate of up to 50%, with the rates phasing out over the next few years. The tariffs would be combined with quotas. Tariffs on solar modules would be as high as 30%, and also would phase out over time.
The solar petition was filed by Suniva Inc. and SolarWorld Americas Inc., two embattled solar panel makers with operations in the U.S. that have filed for bankruptcy protection.
The washing machine petition was filed by Whirlpool Corp. , which is locked in a tough competitive fight with Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc., both of South Ko- rea. Whirlpool’s stock rose 3% in after-hours trading in response to the move, which was announced after U.S. markets closed.
The actions drew criticism from free-market economists warning of new costs to con- sumers and the dangers of trade wars. But it drew praise from some Democrats normally critical of the president, showing the potential of the new Trump trade policy to scramble the political landscape this year.
“I applaud the administration for this strong relief,” said Ohio Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown, who faces a tough re-election fight in a hard-hit manufacturing state that Mr. Trump carried in the 2016 election.
Some of Mr. Trump’s fellow Republicans weren’t as sanguine. “Here’s something Repub- licans used to understand: Tariffs are taxes on families,” Nebraska GOP Sen. Ben Sasse said in a statement.
Trading partners were quick to complain. China’s Commerce Ministry blasted the tariffs as an “abuse of trade remedy measures.” The Mexican government said it will use “all legal resources at its disposal” in response.
1
Mr. Trump has long promised to pursue a harder trade line by dusting off little-used trade laws that had largely been avoided by his predecessors, especially since the 1995 creation of the World Trade Organization, whose goal has been to discourage such unilateral actions by nations. The Trump administration is imposing the new barriers under a 1974 trade law that permits companies to seek relief if they can prove “serious injury” from a sudden surge in imports. That “safeguard” lawwas last invoked by the GeorgeW. Bush admin- istration in 2002 to protect steelmakers, but it later removed the steel tariffs after theWorldTradeOrganizationdeemed them improper. No president has considered such protections since then. Now the Trump administration has taken up two “safeguard” cases, andwith thepresident approvingnew tariffs inboth cases,more industries are expect to follow in seeking similar relief. In addition, the administration is weighing new protections for the steel and aluminum industries in the name of national secu- rity, invoking a law that hasn’t been used since the 1980s. Deci- sions are expected by April. Officials also are expected to announce soon recommendations for potential sanctions against China in retaliation for allegedly forcing U.S. companies to turn over valuable intellectual prop- erty. Indeed, administration officials say that there will be a much greater focus this year onattackingBeijing’s government-steered trade policy, and the $300-billion-plus annual U.S. trade deficit with China. While Mr. Trump had been extremely critical of Chinese trade policy during the presidential campaign, he largely held back from taking action last year, in part because he was seeking co- operation in reining in North Korea’s nuclear arms program. “If you look at solar closely, you have a clear example of Chinese industrial policy propping up an industry, creating excess ca- pacity in an industry, there being significant harm to the United States and globally as well,” aWhite House trade official told re- porters. “We need to figure out how to deal with that, not just for the solar industry, but for a lot of different industries where you’re going to see the same playbook trotted out.” Both the washing machine and solar actions are likely to face a challenge from trading partners before the WTO. Since the or- ganization’s creation, the U.S. has invoked the safeguard law six times. Each action has been taken to the trade courts in Geneva, which often have deemed them improper.
South Korean Trade Minister Kim Hyun-Chong said at a meeting with local business and industry leaders in Seoul Tuesday he would file a complaint against the latest “protectionist” and “unfair” U.S. safeguard measures to the WTO.
Under the trade rules invoked by the Trump administration Monday—Section 201 of the 1974 trade act—Suniva, SolarWorld, and Whirlpool first needed to get approval from the independent U.S. International Trade Commission to declare that they qualified for safeguard relief.
The four-member panel voted unanimously in both cases to support the petitions, and then recommended to the White House late last year that it impose some form of protection
2
for the domestic industry. The Monday announcement came days before the White House faced a legal deadline to respond to the ITC recommendation.
In anticipation of the Trump move, foreign makers of both washers and solar panels ramped up exports to the U.S. at the end of 2017 to get ahead of the barriers, and consumers could now see a sudden drop in supply.
The remedies imposed by the administration fell short of requests from the solar and washing-machine makers, which had both sought steeper tariffs. But both groups praised Mr. Trump for his actions. Suniva thanked the Trump administration “for holding China and its proxies accountable.”
“Today the president is sending a message that American innovation and manufacturing will not be bullied out of existence without a fight,” the company said.
Whirlpool Chairman Jeff M. Fettig issued a statement thanking the Trump administration and calling the washing machine decision “a victory for American workers and consumers alike.”
U.S. solar-panel installers, who have benefited from the surge of cheap imports, attacked the decision.
Ed Fenster, co-founder and executive chairman of Sunrun Inc., a solar installer based in California, called on “states with huge solar workforces, from South Carolina to California” to “step up to overcome this federal headwind” with offsetting policies.
The Solar Energy Industries Association, a group that represents installers and others across the solar industry, andwhich opposed theprotectionpetition, estimates that the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration will cost 23,000 jobs this year and result in the delay or cancellation of billions of dollars in solar investments. “They will create a crisis in a part of our economy that has been thriving,” said Abigail Ross Hopper, president of the association.
South Korea’s LG Electronics Inc., in a statement, said it was “very disappointed in this misguided decision,” adding that; “this is a textbook case about how certain companies can game the process to use trade laws to try to accomplish what they can’t accomplish in the marketplace.”
In both the solar andwashingmachine cases, the U.S. industry had earlierwon protection from imports under more commonly used trade laws designed to offer protection against goods that are improperly subsidized, or “dumped”—sold unfairly below cost.
But inboth cases, they said that foreign rivals simply shiftedproduction toother countries to avoid the tariffs, prompting thedemands theTrumpadministrationprovidebigger, blunter trade protections provided under the safeguard law.
—Andrew Tangel contributed to this article. Write to JacobM. Schlesinger at jacob.schlesinger@wsj.comandErin Ailworth at Erin.Ail-
worth@wsj.com
3