Author: admin

Critique a paper about cyber bullying and write an essay about it with intro body and conclusion. 675-825 words. The attached file is the paper you’re going to critique. Thanks

Post a brief description of your dissertation topic and an explanation of the purpose of your study. Explain how your dissertation research might effect social change. Be specific and use examples to illustrate your explanation. (The dissertation topic is effect of obesity on breast cancer) READINGS reswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chapter 4, “Writing Strategies and Ethical Consideration” (pp. 77-101) Chapter 6, “The Purpose Statement” (pp. 123–137) http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php

Satire is still just as relevant in our contemporary culture as it was during Swift’s and Pope’s days. In the spirit of Swift and Pope, write your own satirical response to some contemporary issue or trend in American culture–approximately 500 (about 2 pages, double spaced with standard margins & 12 pt. font size). Your response can be in any form–essay, fictional account, even poetic form, but somehow identify the topic in your title. Remember that satire hinges often on exaggeration or understatement and contains irony.

12 font, Times New Roman. 1 inch margins. Pages numbered. Use APA rules for in-text citation and end-of-paper references. 2. NO quotes allowed. Paraphrase is strongly encouraged. It’s a Turnitin assignment, so > 20% match will be unfavorable to the grade assigned. Grammar will be 50% of the grade. 3. Use this link to view the movie, unless you have another way to see it for free: https://vimeo.com/36787755 4. Use the following general format for the paper: Introduction of the movie and what you plan to discuss in the paper Present major themes of the movie, especially related to health Relate the movie themes to the books discussion of economics, government, law and society. Is what’s presented in the movie as related to food sustainable for the population and society? Talk about health. Use a minimal of 7 outside resources, preferably academic journal articles to support your views

First two pages- select three journal articles related to the effect of air pollution on human health. Articles should be on or after 2010. Abstracts 1, 2, 3 – use your own words to explain the interesting findings of the articles that are related to the topic that you want to talk about and supports the conclusions that you will reach later. DO NOT list the titles in the paper you are writing, they should be referenced at the end APA style. The bottom line is that this is a single research paper of a topic related to health and environment. Discuss the health effects of air pollution and why the abstracts supports your conclusion. Critique the articles as what’s good and not so good about them. Is the methods used wrong? Do the findings meet your expectations? etc. Provide personal examples that may be related to the subject matter. -Next two pages (450 words)-Watch the movie (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xvz_m5uPV4s) and discuss the following. Use supported evidence where possible. Follow the rules listed below. What’s movie about? Give a brief description of the main topics presented. What are the main environmental and health concerns presented? Provide 2 examples of each from the movie. Think back to module 1 where we discussed the triple bottom line, what about each of the three bottom lines here, is there a balance or some bottom lines have outplaced others? Since this movie came out, there have been new concerns raised related to fracking. Research and find 3 instances related to fracking and its impact on economic, environmental, health and safety that are currently being talked about. e.g. Oklahoma and earthquakes. We live in Texas where energy is a main driver of our economy. What’s your own opinion on the topic, especially related to health? Find supporting evidence to your argument

This paper is an argumentative Synthesis. It must be based on the story Serving in America ISBN: 978-1-4576-0671-7 and the first chapter of the book $2.00 a day by Kathryn J. Edin & H. Luke Shaefer. 2 (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/) and search for the needed information (Purdue Owl is an extremely useful tool). Best of luck! BN 3 Class: WRIT 201 Instructor: Ben Nickol Document: Paper II Assignment The assignment for Paper II is to write an argumentative synthesis. An argumentative synthesis can be understood as an explanatory synthesis (Paper I) that also:  Provides a source you yourself locate using the Helena College Library databases  Articulates your own opinion about the subject discussed To write Paper II, choose one of the articles we read from CHAPTER FOUR—Money and Success. Those articles are: -“Sam Walton / Jay Z” by Packer -“Serving in Florida” by Ehrenreich -“From Beyond Outrage” by Reich -“From a Tangle of Pathology to a Race-Fair America” by Aja, et al. Once you’ve chosen your article, you then want to go online to the Helena College Library website and begin searching for a second article that you believe “speaks” to the first. As with Paper I, you’re looking for an article that (a) reinforces the other article’s perspectives/points, (b) disputes the other article’s perspectives/points or (c) does both. To conduct this search, you want to use one of the databases the library provides. You can use any database you wish, but I recommend starting with Ebsco (http://web.b.ebscohost.com.hctproxy.lib.umt.edu:7048/ehost/search/advanced?vid=1&sid=bee76427-be35-4861-a0af-e790f37e8493%40sessionmgr103). NOTE: To access this site, you may have to sign in with your Helena College credentials. Finally, when searching for an article make sure it is both credible (published by a respected scholar, writer or journalist) and current (nothing older than 2005). Once you’ve obtained this article, you then want to reflect about the issues brought up in the two articles (the one you found and the one from Chapter Four) and decide what you personally would like to add to the discussion. This will enter the paper as your own argument. You can either (a) agree with a point one or both of the articles make and develop it further, (b) dispute a point one or both of the articles make and explain why you disagree with it or (c) introduce and support a new point about the subject. What follows is a suggested outline for your paper: I. Introduction (1 paragraph) a. Contextualize the topic. b. Explain what about the topic is interesting or controversial. c. Introduce the two authors, their two articles, and explain what those articles are about or argue. d. Articulate your own position. e. Provide a plan statement/thesis that explains to the reader what your paper will do. (“This paper will synthesize [the articles you’ve chosen] and argue [your own argument about the topic].”) II. Article from book (2 paragraphs) a. Summarize a point or points made (or implied) in the article you’ve chosen from the book. III. Article from database (2 paragraphs) a. Explain how a point or points in this article can be read as reinforcing or disputing the point(s) made in the previous article. IV. Your Argument (2 paragraphs) a. Articulate what points from the preceding four paragraphs you agree with or disagree with (and why), or else branch out and make a new point, or points, of your own. V. Conclusion (1 paragraph) a. Review the ground you’ve covered in this paper and emphasize your stance and the logic behind it. Length: 8 paragraphs 4 Due Date (VIA EMAIL ATTACHMENT): 7/24 Citation: For WRIT 201 papers, it’s very important to use proper MLA in-text citation, and to provide a full works cited page. If you’re unsure what this entails, consult your Pocket Guide from WRIT 101 or go online to Purdue Owl (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/) and search for the needed information (Purdue Owl is an extremely useful tool). Best of luck!

Imagine you are an instructor who has to present APA guidelines to your class. Create a 6-panel brochure that covers the APA guidelines and expectations for your course according to your reading and the current version of the APA manual. Format the brochure as follows: Font size to be no larger than 11 Margins to be no larger than 1/2 inch Clipart/pictures to be no larger than 1 1/2 square inches Lines should be no greater than single-spaced Each page (with the exception of the cover and the mailing page) should be filled For assistance with creating a brochure, please click on the link to the right of these instructions, to view the video tutorial on how to create a brochure in Microsoft Word.

Choose two domestic and two international terrorist organizations from the government lists of terrorist organizations. In 750-1,000 words, describe the following: Describe the ideological foundations of each of the groups. Describe the modus operandi of each group and their most recent acts of terror. Explain how the motivations and tactics differ between the domestic and the international terrorist groups you chose. Use three to four scholarly resources to support your explanations. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

2 pages typed Double spaced 5 paragraphs (introduction, 3 body paragraphs, and a conclusion)

Includes problem, sub problems, data and sources, assumptions and delimitations, importance of the study, hypothesis, literature review, conclusions based on the findings, was hypothesis supported or not based on the findings, recommendations to management based on this research. Paper to be 25-30 pages, double spaced. Submit your final project for review and comment. Be certain it has been proofread and there are no errors. Be certain it is in a format appropriate for this assignment. (It is due in 4 days) I have attached a copy of a page that I wrote. Sources must be sited