Author: admin

This assignment is for ENG-112 College Composition II class. I would need the paper no later than 12:00 p.m. on 07/18/2017 EST. My topic is “Violent Media and the Effects on Our Youth” I need a better Title for my paper than that though! The paper must be 6 pages long. Those 6 pages should not include the cover page or references/works cited page. I have attached a Sample Essay with comments from my Professor for this type of Essay. Please see the below instructions from my Professor for this assignment: Your essay should include the following sections: Title/Cover page: Use a specific title that quickly conveys the contents of your essay. Introduction: Researched arguments are usually organized in a “closed form,” with the central issue and thesis explicitly presented in the introduction. Your introduction should: o Get the reader’s attention by identifying and defining the issue that the essay will address o Demonstrate your awareness that you are entering a conversation that contains competing perspectives on the issue o Make a focused claim about your issue (i.e., state an arguable thesis that locates your stance among the competing perspectives) Body of the report: In the body of your essay, you will: • Provide reasons that support your thesis. • Provide evidence for each of your reasons (e.g., your own reasoning plus research). • Anticipate objections from people with other perspectives and, when necessary, provide refutations. • Be aware of the unspoken/unwritten assumptions (values and beliefs) underlying both your claims and reasons, as well as the claims and reasons of competing perspectives. You will structure your argument according to the following argumentative structure: ❖ Classical: The purpose of your argument is to persuade your audience to agree with your point of view, take your side on an issue, or make a decision in your favor. Conclusion: Summarize your main points, and answer the question “So what?” (i.e., explain how this topic impacts us and why your audience should care or pay attention). References / Work Cited page: List the sources that you used in your report. *****NOTE***** To write a successful academic argument in which you state what you think and why: ➢ You must back-up your arguments with evidence. Telling me how you feel won’t cut it. I need to see your proof, your statistics, your quotes from experts, etc. ➢ You must address the counter-arguments to your thesis. Your goal with this paper is not necessarily to persuade me to agree with your argument, but to show me that you can reason and write in a logical, coherent manner, while at the same time “entertaining a thought without accepting it” (Aristotle).This assignment is for ENG-112 College Composition II class. I would need the paper no later than 12:00 p.m. on 07/18/2017 EST. My topic is “Violent Media and the Effects on Our Youth” I need a better Title for my paper than that though! The paper must be 6 pages long. Those 6 pages should not include the cover page or references/works cited page. I have attached a Sample Essay with comments from my Professor for this type of Essay. Please see the below instructions from my Professor for this assignment: Your essay should include the following sections: Title/Cover page: Use a specific title that quickly conveys the contents of your essay. Introduction: Researched arguments are usually organized in a “closed form,” with the central issue and thesis explicitly presented in the introduction. Your introduction should: o Get the reader’s attention by identifying and defining the issue that the essay will address o Demonstrate your awareness that you are entering a conversation that contains competing perspectives on the issue o Make a focused claim about your issue (i.e., state an arguable thesis that locates your stance among the competing perspectives) Body of the report: In the body of your essay, you will: • Provide reasons that support your thesis. • Provide evidence for each of your reasons (e.g., your own reasoning plus research). • Anticipate objections from people with other perspectives and, when necessary, provide refutations. • Be aware of the unspoken/unwritten assumptions (values and beliefs) underlying both your claims and reasons, as well as the claims and reasons of competing perspectives. You will structure your argument according to the following argumentative structure: ❖ Classical: The purpose of your argument is to persuade your audience to agree with your point of view, take your side on an issue, or make a decision in your favor. Conclusion: Summarize your main points, and answer the question “So what?” (i.e., explain how this topic impacts us and why your audience should care or pay attention). References / Work Cited page: List the sources that you used in your report. *****NOTE***** To write a successful academic argument in which you state what you think and why: ➢ You must back-up your arguments with evidence. Telling me how you feel won’t cut it. I need to see your proof, your statistics, your quotes from experts, etc. ➢ You must address the counter-arguments to your thesis. Your goal with this paper is not necessarily to persuade me to agree with your argument, but to show me that you can reason and write in a logical, coherent manner, while at the same time “entertaining a thought without accepting it” (Aristotle).This assignment is for ENG-112 College Composition II class. I would need the paper no later than 12:00 p.m. on 07/18/2017 EST. My topic is “Violent Media and the Effects on Our Youth” I need a better Title for my paper than that though! The paper must be 6 pages long. Those 6 pages should not include the cover page or references/works cited page. I have attached a Sample Essay with comments from my Professor for this type of Essay. Please see the below instructions from my Professor for this assignment: Your essay should include the following sections: Title/Cover page: Use a specific title that quickly conveys the contents of your essay. Introduction: Researched arguments are usually organized in a “closed form,” with the central issue and thesis explicitly presented in the introduction. Your introduction should: o Get the reader’s attention by identifying and defining the issue that the essay will address o Demonstrate your awareness that you are entering a conversation that contains competing perspectives on the issue o Make a focused claim about your issue (i.e., state an arguable thesis that locates your stance among the competing perspectives) Body of the report: In the body of your essay, you will: • Provide reasons that support your thesis. • Provide evidence for each of your reasons (e.g., your own reasoning plus research). • Anticipate objections from people with other perspectives and, when necessary, provide refutations. • Be aware of the unspoken/unwritten assumptions (values and beliefs) underlying both your claims and reasons, as well as the claims and reasons of competing perspectives. You will structure your argument according to the following argumentative structure: ❖ Classical: The purpose of your argument is to persuade your audience to agree with your point of view, take your side on an issue, or make a decision in your favor. Conclusion: Summarize your main points, and answer the question “So what?” (i.e., explain how this topic impacts us and why your audience should care or pay attention). References / Work Cited page: List the sources that you used in your report. *****NOTE***** To write a successful academic argument in which you state what you think and why: ➢ You must back-up your arguments with evidence. Telling me how you feel won’t cut it. I need to see your proof, your statistics, your quotes from experts, etc. ➢ You must address the counter-arguments to your thesis. Your goal with this paper is not necessarily to persuade me to agree with your argument, but to show me that you can reason and write in a logical, coherent manner, while at the same time “entertaining a thought without accepting it” (Aristotle).Thi
s assignment is for ENG-112 College Composition II class. I would need the paper no later than 12:00 p.m. on 07/18/2017 EST. My topic is “Violent Media and the Effects on Our Youth” I need a better Title for my paper than that though! The paper must be 6 pages long. Those 6 pages should not include the cover page or references/works cited page. I have attached a Sample Essay with comments from my Professor for this type of Essay. Please see the below instructions from my Professor for this assignment: Your essay should include the following sections: Title/Cover page: Use a specific title that quickly conveys the contents of your essay. Introduction: Researched arguments are usually organized in a “closed form,” with the central issue and thesis explicitly presented in the introduction. Your introduction should: o Get the reader’s attention by identifying and defining the issue that the essay will address o Demonstrate your awareness that you are entering a conversation that contains competing perspectives on the issue o Make a focused claim about your issue (i.e., state an arguable thesis that locates your stance among the competing perspectives) Body of the report: In the body of your essay, you will: • Provide reasons that support your thesis. • Provide evidence for each of your reasons (e.g., your own reasoning plus research). • Anticipate objections from people with other perspectives and, when necessary, provide refutations. • Be aware of the unspoken/unwritten assumptions (values and beliefs) underlying both your claims and reasons, as well as the claims and reasons of competing perspectives. You will structure your argument according to the following argumentative structure: ❖ Classical: The purpose of your argument is to persuade your audience to agree with your point of view, take your side on an issue, or make a decision in your favor. Conclusion: Summarize your main points, and answer the question “So what?” (i.e., explain how this topic impacts us and why your audience should care or pay attention). References / Work Cited page: List the sources that you used in your report. *****NOTE***** To write a successful academic argument in which you state what you think and why: ➢ You must back-up your arguments with evidence. Telling me how you feel won’t cut it. I need to see your proof, your statistics, your quotes from experts, etc. ➢ You must address the counter-arguments to your thesis. Your goal with this paper is not necessarily to persuade me to agree with your argument, but to show me that you can reason and write in a logical, coherent manner, while at the same time “entertaining a thought without accepting it” (Aristotle).

Using one of the many online resources such as Health Grades, Leapfrog’s Hospital Quality and Safety Survey Results, Quality Check or NCQA’s Health Plan Report Card, explore and identify public report cards being utilized in today’s healthcare environment. Select one report card and develop a short 3-4 PowerPoint presentation that addresses at least the following listed below. Title Page Sponsor of the report card Intended audience of the report card Explanation of how data is collected or obtained Analysis of the strengths and weaknesses Objectivity Data collection methods Data accuracy, completeness, timeliness, data sources, and methods of collection Ease of use Reference Page [APA format]

essay your future profession With a length of 600-800 words, this editorial work encourages you to make links between the works read during the session and your curriculum. The text will consist of a written letter to a fictitious representative of the field to which you are focusing and in which a problematic dimension of the profession is called into question in the light of a striking aspect of a work. It is a matter of examining the possibility of literature to make us think about life in general and thus go beyond the binding framework of the book. Your text should be divided into three main parts: 1 – Presentation of what you think is a problem in the profession you are hoping to occupy. It would probably be easier to identify a problem related to the authoritative mentality (or even ideology) in the field. You must insist on the negative aspects of the application of this mentality, ideally by basing your argument on concrete examples (which can be invented, but plausible). 2- Presentation of a literary work to the program in which an ideology similar to the one you have just criticized is also presented in a negative way. You must insist, as you did in your oral presentation, on the (thematic and formal) means used by the author to condemn the mentality in question. 3. Always in the light of the work, show how a change of mentality (in your field) could be beneficial. You can base your argument on a solution proposed in the work, on the positive impact the work has had on society or on a plausible extrapolation from the book. Tip: If you are having difficulty getting started by identifying a problem in your domain, start by reviewing your notes about the works studied during the session; You will probably find at least one element that can apply to your situation. The points will be distributed as follows: Presentation of the problem / 5 Presentation of the work / 5 Benefits of Change / 5 Rhetorical Strategies * / 5 * Remember that this is to convince the recipient: Logos (logic, reasoning and mode of construction of the argument): formal and thematic references to works and citations from serious reference works (with sources);

For this , you Medical Coursework will interview someone who has experienced an illness or other medical event (broadly defined). Interviews should be conducted in person or over video conferencing. While the person may still be experiencing the illness or may be in a recovery stage, please do not interview anyone who is currently seriously ill or emotionally distressed in response to an illness. See this interview guidePreview the documentView in a new window for some questions to get you started. Remember that your questions should vary depending on the specific nature of the medical event. Obtain oral consent before you conduct your interview. Take notes during the interview, and type up more detailed field notes as soon as possible afterwards. Remember that you should record not just facts, but thoughts, reactions, and reflections. Turn in your field notes organized in the following categories: Interview/narrative description (1 paragraph): Describe the interview conditions. For example, consider the following: Who did you interview? (No names, but give a description of the individual.) Where? When? How long was the interview? How did you document it (handwritten notes, audiorecording, multiple methods, etc.)? Interview notes: Provide an outline of your conversation. What questions did you ask and what were your interviewee’s answers? You do no need a full word-for-word transcript of the interview, but your notes should be detailed and give a sense of the conversation and the person’s story. Preliminary analysis (1-2 paragraphs): Consider the following: What patterns or themes can you start to identify? What preliminary connections can you make to class topics? What further questions do you have? Personal reflections (1 paragraph): Consider the following: What was it like to be doing this interview? What felt comfortable or uncomfortable? What did you learn that was unexpected? What would you do differently in a future interview?

READ THE SHORT PLAY: Trifles By Susan Glaspell http://www.one-act-plays.com/dramas/trifles.html Employ standard literary paper-writing practices: write in paragraphs establish a thesis substantiate the thesis with examples (including page numbers) and explanation employ introductory and concluding paragraphs polish your writing through proofreading. Choose one of these topics: Trace the changes in the developing relationship between Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters Note the objects in the Wright home, and speculate about their significance Examine the play for clues to Mrs. Wright’s motive, and trace their unveiling Consider how a comparison between Mrs. Wright and her canary might shed light on her motives or Compare/contrast the male characters’ attitudes toward clues and the female characters’ attitudes toward clues

Need by Today @5pm ***no plag *** 350 words *** 2 source See link for Lesson 2 reading: www.sweethaven02.com/openstax/American_Government-LR.pdf Using concepts and terms from the readings, compare and contrast the 2008 and 2016 presidential election campaign tactics by reviewing one Democratic ad and one Republican ad from each election (four ads overall). Remember to analyze the ads. Don’t simply describe them. (Because you will link to your ads, the rest of us can see for ourselves what they looked like). Leave out personal opinions, and stick to facts and concepts in the readings, which also should be cited where appropriate. Here are some web sources which you might want to consult: http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/ http://pcl.stanford.edu/campaigns/ http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/

****Please pay attention to instructions, they are very specific***** This is a review of an article that I have attached. Please please read and respond in an appropriate manner that is defined in the below description Article reviews are limited to TWO PAGES so you’ll need to use them wisely. I have put together this guide to help you make the most of your space. The structure of your review should include the following sections: Introduction Section The length of an introduction is usually a single paragraph, and this section briefly explains the topic of the article. Begin by providing initial identification of the article and an indication of the major aspects of the article you will be discussing. This should be a short paragraph, and your junior high English teacher might even argue that this isn’t long enough to be a real paragraph. Article Summary Section This section presents a precise summary of the article’s main claims, findings, and arguments. Discuss the main aim of the article and summarize the main finding or key argument(s). Conclude this section with a brief statement of your evaluation of the article. This can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response. Your opinion statement should provide the segue from this section to the Assessment section. The summary should only make up about a third of the critical review. You need to present the author’s argument clearly and objectively summarized so that your reader can recognize the theoretical approach and the range of material covered. Assessment Section The critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the article. Remember to base your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference or use examples). In this section you are required to question the information and opinions in the article and present your evaluation or judgment of the main themes of the article. Provide a critical discussion of the key issues raised in the article. In this section you need to clearly present the author main points or arguments before you express your own opinion. In this section, you need to indicate the main position or claim that your review will make in response to the article, and try to use relevant examples to support your arguments. You need to develop your review in relation to aspects of the article, offering thoughtful, well-supported proof for your claim(s) (examples). Make sure to provide reasons for your agreement or disagreement of the article supported by relevant example, theoretical framework or your own relevant working experience. If you are wondering how long should this section be, I’d estimate it ought to take up about half your paper. Conclusion Section Final evaluation of the overall contribution that the article has made to your understanding of the topic (and maybe its importance to the development of knowledge in this particular area or discipline. It should summarize the main points made in the assessment section on each of the main points. Other thoughts The majority of the two allotted pages should be comprised of the Article Summary and Article Assessment sections with the assessment section being the longer of the two. DO NOT use the first or second person in your write up. The Introduction and Conclusion should be short and sweet. I have attached a blank template formatted just the way I like it for you to use in writing your article responses. Please do not try to improve upon my formatting. Use it for your write up and submit it when you are done.

For thi literature essay you MUST write on one Restoration comedy (The Country Wife or The Man of Mode) and you MUST NOT write on the text used for your critical analysis. Please note that for questions which specifically ask you to consider Restoration comedy you should only write on The Country Wife and The Man of Mode. Questions which ask you to consider Early Modern Comedy can be answered by referring to Shakespearean plays and/or Restoration plays. The question is, Discuss the role of master and servant relationships in Early Modern comedy. ♣ Demonstrate that you have paid careful attention to and given detailed consideration to the question taking particular care to ensure that you have understood and are addressing its precise wording. This means that if you are uncertain about the meaning of some terms you should seek to clarify them with the use of a good dictionary and/or by consulting the module tutor. ♣ Provide a clear, relevant and coherent argument. It is not enough to put down a series of points, these have to be structured into a logical sequence in which point a) can be seen to relate to point b) and so on. The argument must also be consistently relevant to the question and not stray into other issues which it does not ask you to consider. It is important to keep the question in mind throughout and ask yourself if your argument is addressing it. An essay is a rhetorical act of persuasion, the more coherent your argument, the more convincing your case will be. If the reader cannot follow the stages in your argument they will be less convinced that you properly understand the issues you are addressing and you will lose marks as a consequence. ♣ Display original and independent thought. Whilst it is expected that your essay should demonstrate that you have understood arguments and ideas presented to you in lectures and seminars simply repeating what you have been told on a topic is not sufficient at degree level. Good work is characterised by the ability to think independently in response to the framework provided by the module. That means you will be rewarded for having insights and perspectives which you have developed independently. ♣ Quote extensively from the primary texts you are considering to illustrate your points and follow the advice (below) on how to reference Shakespeare’s plays. ♣ Write as clearly and fluently as possible adopting an appropriate academic style: avoid colloquialism, abbreviated forms (etc, ie, eg) and aim for a formal but not over-ornate style. Your written expression in assessed work should not be like conversational speech but as close as you can get to the critical works you read on Shakespeare. In semester two of level one you need to be working to develop a good prose style and you will get much better marks if you are able to display this effectively. ♣ Demonstrate an appropriate engagement with a range of relevant secondary sources (critical and contextual work of an appropriate scholarly standard). ♣ Give proper acknowledgement of and proper references for other people’s work. Please recognise that a failure to properly acknowledge when you are drawing on the work of others, even if you have put this into your own words, can result in a charge of plagiarism which could result in your work being very severely penalised (awarded a fail mark) and in some circumstances may result in you having to withdraw from the Course. ♣ Present your work properly in accordance with the Essential Style Guide (see the MyBeckett page for Early Modern Comedy for a copy of the Essential Style Guide). Worth 80% of overall mark

A career in IT requires an understanding of the various technologies that compose a computing environment. Managing computer hardware and software is the first step. Whether you are an IT project manager, administrator (computer system, database or network), systems analyst, network specialist, software developer, digital investigator or security analyst, there may be a time when you need to administer your system, or help others administer theirs. Please refer to the following for information about accessing and using LabSim: Getting Started with LabSim LabSim Navigation Click here for the instructions for the Unit 5 Lab tasks. Prepare a Word document that contains 1-2 pages of information summarizing your thoughts about the following bullets. Explain the relationship between “code of ethics” and “professionalism” in an IT environment. Describe your thoughts about what “professionalism” would mean to someone who is in the role of network administrator. How would that compare to someone who was a systems analyst or a programmer? There are often reports of unprofessional acts by someone in IT that have significant implications for organizations. Research reports of unprofessional behavior by someone in IT and discuss whether their behavior was unethical, illegal, or socially responsible. One such example would be data theft by an employee. One example of this type of unprofessional behavior could be found here. You can find other examples at this website. Discuss an example situation of someone in an IT role that lacked professionalism or violated a “code of ethics”. Identify whether your example was socially, ethically or legally irresponsible. Prepare your work in a Word document using Times New Roman 12 point font, APA style (title page, abstract, citations, and references) with valid scholarly resources.

Generate a list of the 5 television shows that you watch often (Netflix counts) and write a brief description of each show (to include): What is it about? (Brief about 4 sentences) Do these shows adequately depict society? Why are they appealing? How do these shows reflect the norms and values of society? How has your television tastes changed over time? Why?