Posted on

Apple Cloud and its functionality and capabilities

CIS 336 Week 5 Discussion

1. What is a Cloud” Please respond to the following:
· So, what is Cloud? Cloud is a set of pooled resources delivered over the internet. Cloud allows you to deliver services globally to your customers at the least cost, and with the ability to service a variable workload by scaling the underlying resources up and down to meet the needs of the moment, and at the cost only of the resources consumed.
· From this week’s video, list the Apple Cloud and define its functionality and capabilities.
2. “Essential Characteristics of the Cloud” Please respond to the following:
· On-demand, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity, measure service, charge by usage (“pay as you go”) are the essential characteristics of the Cloud.
· From this week’s video, describe essential characteristics to the cloud.
125 words min each question. No need for coversheet.
Posted on

Haskell programmers

Haskell programmers


Questions 4-6 refer to the contents of HW2.lhs. Include two files in your submission: a text file with the answers to questions 1-3, and the completed HW2.lhs file.
1. (3 points)
Imagine you’re given an interpreter for C++ and asked to build a compiler from C++ to x86 machine code that implements the same semantics as the interpreter. What does it mean to claim your compiler is correct? How would you test this claim?
2. (4 points)
Consider the following Haskell code:
data Shape = Circle Double | Rect Double Double
area :: Shape -> Double
area (Circle radius) = 3.1415 * radius * radius
area (Rect width height) = width * height
Write out the full sequence of tokens in this program, in the order that they appear.
3. (8 points)
For each of the first four phases of a typical compiler pipeline (source input, lexical analysis, parsing, and semantic analysis), describe a small specific change that you could make to the code in question 2 that would trigger an error in that phase (and not any previous phase). Justify each answer. (You might find it helpful to copy the code into a Haskell file and load it in an interpreter to try to trigger errors there.)
4. (4 points)
Fill in the definitions of the Sing and (:.:) cases for the “check” function.
5. (2 points)
Fill in the definition of the “star” function.
6. (6 points)
Write at least three more regexes and at least two tests for each that demonstrate that “check” and “star” are working correctly.
Posted on

application of assessment tool (AChecker) to examine Web accessibility for a couple Web sites

You will complete several steps for this assignment. Step 1: You will become familiar with an assessment tool (AChecker) to examine Web accessibility for a couple Web sites. This is a freely available tool that you can learn about by reviewing the tutorial found here.Step 2: Select two Web sites that are somewhat similar in functionality. Find one that you think is good and one that you think is bad. Whether or not the Web site is good or bad is based upon your own personal perspective. Step 3: Examine the Web sites regarding your suggestions as to how they might be improved.Step 4: Create a PowerPoint presentation that includes 10-12 slides with voice recording that presents your recommended improvements. Discuss the good and bad factors of each Web site. Discuss how a sample task is supported on each of the Web sites. Describe how the Web site can be redesigned or revised to achieve better results. The requirements for the presentation are as follows:Title slide  Introduction to the 2 Web sites  Comparison of the 2 Web sites  Explanation of how to improve the sample task  Listing of recommended improvements  Information regarding anticipated localization and globalization factors  Summary and conclusions  At least 3–5 references Be sure to consider the following:Patterns  Wizards  Interactivity  Animation  Transitions Screenshots may be used in your slides to support your explanations.Remember, your presentation must include both the slides and the audio to present the content.Include a title slide and APA format on citations used in the presentation with a closing references slide. Use proper design regarding elements (fonts, color, images, etc.) on your slides.Use the Record Slide Show option to present the information on each slide and record your verbal explanations for each item. Please refer to the following for more detailed instructions on recording your voice on a PowerPoint slide:How to Record Voice Narration for Your PowerPoint 2016 Presentation Use AChecker, research literature, and your textbook to support your redesign or revision recommendations. Please submit your assignment.For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.Grading Rubric Project CriteriaExceeds: 90%–100%Very Good: 80%–89%Meets: 70%–79%Needs Improvement: Below 70%Content 
(75%)Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment.Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment. Effective Communication
(10%)Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar.Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract from the message. Organization is apparent and mostly clear. Format is appropriate to assignment, but not entirely consistent. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar.Demonstrates acceptable written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates reasonable expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Sometimes, audience is addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present and may distract from the message. Organization is a bit unclear. Format is inconsistent. The writing was of collegiate level with several errors in spelling or grammar.Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates inadequate or partial expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is often not addressed appropriately. Language often impedes the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are frequent and often distract from meaning or presentation. Organization is inadequate, confusing, and distracting. The format is inadequate and obscures meaning. The writing was less than collegiate level with numerous errors in spelling or grammar.Supporting Analysis
(15%)Analysis exceeds minimum requirements. Sources are used to support analysis, are appropriate, and are properly referenced.Basic analysis provided to support assertions. Sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.Limited analysis provided to support assertions. Some sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.No or inaccurate analysis, no sources are cited when needed, analysis and/or sources are not appropriate. When sources are used, they are not properly referenced.
Posted on

risks to identify threats, vulnerabilities, controls, critical business functions, disaster recovery, and incident responses in your solution to this assignment.

I have assignment that need to be turn in APA format. This project related to Information security and risk management.
Attached is the Project document that identifies  Tasks 1 that must be completed.
Within the Project document you will find a Scenario of a fictitious health services organization.  A Project Visual diagram is also provided that incorporates the Scenario information.
This Project assignment is built around this Scenario so your final grade depends on how well you incorporate the risks and other information from this Scenario into your solutions.
You MUST use these Scenario risks to identify threats, vulnerabilities, controls, critical business functions, disaster recovery, and incident responses in your solution to this assignment.
Part 1 – Task 1: Threats – Vulnerabilities (Only task 1)
Please look for the attached project plan and sample templates. If you see any content highlighted in yellow in sample templates that should be replace with actual content.
Risk register excel attachment should also be completed part of task1.
———————
sample_final project boilers document is just for reference. you should have to be documented as a sample document

Posted on

Web accessibility for a couple Web sites

 
You will complete several steps for this assignment. Step 1: You will become familiar with an assessment tool (AChecker) to examine Web accessibility for a couple Web sites. This is a freely available tool that you can learn about by reviewing the tutorial found here.Step 2: Select two Web sites that are somewhat similar in functionality. Find one that you think is good and one that you think is bad. Whether or not the Web site is good or bad is based upon your own personal perspective. Step 3: Examine the Web sites regarding your suggestions as to how they might be improved.Step 4: Create a PowerPoint presentation that includes 10-12 slides with voice recording that presents your recommended improvements. Discuss the good and bad factors of each Web site. Discuss how a sample task is supported on each of the Web sites. Describe how the Web site can be redesigned or revised to achieve better results. The requirements for the presentation are as follows:Title slide  Introduction to the 2 Web sites  Comparison of the 2 Web sites  Explanation of how to improve the sample task  Listing of recommended improvements  Information regarding anticipated localization and globalization factors  Summary and conclusions  At least 3–5 references Be sure to consider the following:Patterns  Wizards  Interactivity  Animation  Transitions Screenshots may be used in your slides to support your explanations.Remember, your presentation must include both the slides and the audio to present the content.Include a title slide and APA format on citations used in the presentation with a closing references slide. Use proper design regarding elements (fonts, color, images, etc.) on your slides.Use the Record Slide Show option to present the information on each slide and record your verbal explanations for each item. Please refer to the following for more detailed instructions on recording your voice on a PowerPoint slide:How to Record Voice Narration for Your PowerPoint 2016 Presentation Use AChecker, research literature, and your textbook to support your redesign or revision recommendations. Please submit your assignment.For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.Grading Rubric Project CriteriaExceeds: 90%–100%Very Good: 80%–89%Meets: 70%–79%Needs Improvement: Below 70%Content 
(75%)Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment.Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment. Effective Communication
(10%)Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar.Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract from the message. Organization is apparent and mostly clear. Format is appropriate to assignment, but not entirely consistent. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar.Demonstrates acceptable written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates reasonable expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Sometimes, audience is addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present and may distract from the message. Organization is a bit unclear. Format is inconsistent. The writing was of collegiate level with several errors in spelling or grammar.Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates inadequate or partial expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is often not addressed appropriately. Language often impedes the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are frequent and often distract from meaning or presentation. Organization is inadequate, confusing, and distracting. The format is inadequate and obscures meaning. The writing was less than collegiate level with numerous errors in spelling or grammar.Supporting Analysis
(15%)Analysis exceeds minimum requirements. Sources are used to support analysis, are appropriate, and are properly referenced.Basic analysis provided to support assertions. Sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.Limited analysis provided to support assertions. Some sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.No or inaccurate analysis, no sources are cited when needed, analysis and/or sources are not appropriate. When sources are used, they are not properly referenced.

Posted on

online learning

The Discussion Board (DB) is part of the core of online learning. Classroom discussion in an online environment requires the active participation of students and the instructor to create robust interaction and dialogue. Every student is expected to create an original response to the open-ended DB question as well as engage in dialogue by responding to posts created by others throughout the week. At the end of each unit, DB participation will be assessed based on both level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion.At a minimum, each student will be expected to post an original and thoughtful response to the DB question and contribute to the weekly dialogue by responding to at least two other posts from students. The first contribution must be posted before midnight (Central Time) on Friday of each week. Two additional responses are required after Friday of each week. Students are highly encouraged to engage on the Discussion Board early and often, as that is the primary way the university tracks class attendance and participation.The purpose of the Discussion Board is to allow students to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content and the DB question. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB will be accepted after the end of each unit.Mobile devices, the Internet, and other technologies have made a large impact on the daily lives of people all over the world. Consider how one particular technology item has affected society from a human–computer interaction (HCI) perspective, and answer the following questions:Discuss the technology’s impact on social, ethical, and legal issues.  How do you think the role of this technology has changed HCI since its inception?  How do you see the future of this technology further changing HCI? In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.Grading Rubric Project CriteriaExceeds: 90%–100%Very good: 80%–89%Meets: 70%–79%Needs Improvement: Below 70%Content
(40%)Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar.Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. The writing was of collegiate level with one or less errors in spelling or grammar.Response covers many topics indicated in the assignment. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar.Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment. The writing was less than collegiate level with errors in spelling or grammar.Interaction
(40%)Multiple learner interactions per week that add to the discussion. Responses show evidence of critical analysis with questions to other classmates.At least three learner interactions per week that add to the discussion. Responses show evidence of critical analysis.No less than two learner interactions per week that add to the discussion. Responses show evidence of critical analysis.Zero to one learner interaction per week in the discussion board. Response lacks evidence of critical analysis.Supporting Analysis
(20%)Analysis exceeded minimum requirements. Appropriate sources were used to support analysis and were properly referenced.Basic analysis provided to support discussion. When appropriate to support discussion, appropriate sources were cited and properly referenced.Some limited analysis provided to support discussion. When appropriate to support discussion, sources were cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.No or inaccurate analysis, no sources were cited when needed, analysis and/or sources were not appropriate. When sources used, were not properly referenced.

Posted on

Business Challenges Within the Seven Domains of IT Responsibility

Business Challenges Within the Seven Domains of IT Responsibility

Discussion
Read the following Scenario:
Company M designs, manufactures, and sells electronic door locks for commercial buildings. The company has approximately 1,500 employees in three locations around the United States and generates $50 million in annual revenues. Over 5,000 wholesalers and distributors access the Company M business-to-business (B2B) Web site to place orders and track fulfillment. In the past year, Company M experienced 22 information security incidents, most of which involved lost or stolen laptops, tablet PCs, and smartphones. In addition, the company dealt with four serious malware events that originated from an unpatched server, an insecure wireless network used in the manufacturing plant, an insecure remote connection used by a sales person, and a headquarters employee who downloaded a game from the Internet to her workstation. Three of the malware incidents resulted in files that were erased from the company’s sales database, which had to be restored, and one incident forced the B2B Web site to shut down for 24 hours.
Discussion requirements