utilitarianism

1. What is utilitarianism?
 
2. Do you agree more with classical or contemporary utilitarians on what they consider to be intrinsically good?
 
3. Does Hooker consider religious beliefs about right and wrong to be relevant from a utilitarian perspective?
 
4. What is the difference between act- and rule- utilitarianism?
 
5. In your own words, explain the concepts of active, passive, voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary euthanasia as described by Hooker. Do you find any of these definitions unclear?
 
6. Is Hooker’s utilitarian analysis of euthanasia focused more on policy questions, or more on individual cases? What difference might it make if he were looking at the issue from the other angle?
 
7. What does Hooker consider to be the potential benefits of legalizing euthanasia?
 
8. Why do you think Hooker considers the potential harms of involuntary euthanasia separately from the other forms?
 
9. What does Hooker list as possible harms that could result from legalizing voluntary or non-voluntary euthanasia? Among them, which do you consider most important? Are there others which he has not considered that you think he should?
 
10. What are Hooker’s suggested measures for minimizing the possible harms of legalizing active, voluntary euthanasia? Do you think they sound like they would be sufficient protections against the possible harms?
 
11. How do you feel about what Hooker says regarding inevitable abuse?
 
12. What concern does he raise about the “slippery slope,” and what does he suggest shows it can be addressed? (remember and cross reference this when you read Cohn & Lynn)

euthanasia

1. Is Beauchamp more concerned with the morality of individual cases of euthanasia, or are his arguments intended to support a policy on legalization?
 
2. What is the difference between killing and letting die, according to Beauchamp? What is the “redefinition” he wants to resist? Do you agree with him?
 
3. Explain the point of Beauchamp’s example of Mr. Policeman & Mr. Mafia. Do you agree with him?
 
4. What is Beauchamp asserting about the difference between a “valid refusal” and a “valid authorization?”
 
5. On which points does Beauchamp agree with Bernat, Gert, & Mogielnicki? On which does he disagree? With whom do you agree? Does Beauchamp think that a physician is responsible for the outcome only when they honor a patient’s request, or also when they refuse them? What is his reasoning for this?
 
6. What does Beauchamp identify as the “wrong” in cases when killing a person is wrong?
 
7. Under what circumstances does Beauchamp think one can make the strongest case for euthanasia? What example does he use to illustrate this?
 
8. Why does Beauchamp suggest there is both something right and wrong about “slippery slope” arguments? What example does he offer as at least partially addressing these concerns?

Developmental Theory-Journal Assignment

journal assignment

Sheet1

Theory Seminal Research/Theorist(s) Nature/Nurture/Both Construct(s) Emphasized (cog/phys/soc) Continuous/Discontinuous (stages) Key Tenets/Concepts Strengths Weaknesses Contemporary Applications Notes
Evolutionary
Psychoanalytic
Cognitive Development
Moral Development
Learning
Psychosocial
Sociocultural
Systems

&14Developmental Theory Template

Sheet2

Sheet3

Can You Multi-Task

Psychology 101

Topic: Can You Multi-Task? Complete the experiment on p. 139 of your textbook in the “Try this Out” section. In your discussion post, please describe your results and discuss the following questions:
· Based on your results and the information presented in the textbook, should we multi-task while studying? How about while driving?
· Do you think there are some tasks that are easier to multi-task on than others? If so, which ones? If not, why not?
· Apply the concepts of divided attention and focused awareness to your findings and/or experience with this activity as you answer the questions above.
Must be at least 250 words & be in APA format.

Thesis Statement For The Integrative Literature Review

In this assignment, you will create the thesis statement for your Final Assignment. The thesis is the statement of your perspectives on the literature. It should also include the rationale and relevant empirical and theoretical background supporting your perspectives. The primary objective of this assignment is to outline specific areas of inquiry you intend to answer in the course of the Integrative Literature Review. Although they may change during the course of the review, articulating these areas of inquiry early will help provide focus and direction for your research.  Begin by introducing the areas of inquiry to be included in your Integrative Literature Review. Explain your perspective on the literature and include how you arrived at this viewpoint, how the literature you have chosen to include supports this viewpoint, and why this perspective is relevant to the field of psychology.  Based on your introduction, briefly discuss the literature you have chosen by integrating concepts developed from your four different content domains. Be sure to utilize at least one peer-reviewed source per domain. Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to support your perspectives regarding the literature.   To conclude your assignment, identify any overarching implications shown in the studies and describe how these influenced your perspectives on the literature.  The Integrative Literature Review: Thesis Statement •Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. •Must include a separate title page with the following: ◦Title of paper ◦Student’s name ◦Course name and number ◦Instructor’s name ◦Date submitted •Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. •Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. •Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. •Must use at least four peer-reviewed sources (one source per domain). •Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. •Must include a separate reference list that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
This is the final paper information just in case you need it:
Integrative Literature Review
Pathbuilder is being used for this assignment. Please be certain to complete the “Survey Acknowledgement Quiz” this week in order to submit the Integrative Literature Review. You will not be allowed to submit your Final Paper until you have completed the quiz this week.  The primary goal of this literature review is to integrate concepts from four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. The four content domains should be chosen from previous coursework in this program. In this paper, students will review the findings in the individual empirical articles, organize the research in a meaningful way, evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the research findings, and present an integrated synthesis of the research that sheds new light on the topics within and across the four domains.  The result of a successful integrative literature review may be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to research and practice. Therefore, before writing this literature review, substantive new research must be conducted via the Internet and within the Ashford University Library for each of the four chosen domains. A minimum of six sources must be included for each of the four domains. Although content from literature reviews completed in prior courses within this program may be included, it may not constitute the total research for the individual domains addressed within this assignment. No more than four sources from previous literature reviews completed in this program may be utilized for this integrative review.  The headings listed below must be used within the paper to delineate the sections of content. These sections include the following: a clear introduction that provides a general review and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in which the evidence is presented through analysis, critique, and synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed.  Introduction •Provide a conceptual framework for the review. •Describe how the review will be organized. The questions below may be used to guide this section. ◦What are the guiding theories within the domains? ◦How are the domains connected? ◦Are there competing points of view across the domains? ◦Why is the integration of these domains important? ◦What is the history of these domains? ◦What are the related theories or findings? •Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized. •How and why was the literature chosen? •What is your claim or thesis statement?  Discussion •Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review.  Analysis •Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains. •Integrate concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. •What claim(s) can be made in the introduction? •What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?  Critique  •Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings. •How well does the literature represent the issues across the four domains? •Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the literature. •What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature? •Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments? •What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the literature? •What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims presented? •Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings. •Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research? •Were ethical considerations different across the domains?  Synthesis •Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives. •Describe the research that has previously been done across these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist. •Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made. •Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains.  Conclusion •Provide a conclusion and present potential future considerations. •State your final conclusion(s). •Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary. •What questions remain? •What are the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life? •Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for future research? •What do the overarching implications of the studies show? •Where should the research go from this point to further the understanding of these domains and the greater study of psychology?

Ethical Problem

Part 1  Present a summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict, and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. State clearly what the ethical problem is that you will be dealing with. This section should be neutral and objective. Shorter is better than longer in this section. Do not try to solve the problem or present your opinion(s) in this section.  Part 2  Discuss three different ethical positions or theories that you would apply. Also reference any relevant sections of your professional code of ethics; e.g., APA, ACA, etc. Do not present your opinion(s) on the problem or attempt to solve it here.  Part 3  In this  final section, present what you think would be the best solution to the problem, along with your reasons for your solution and why you think your solution is superior to the others that might be given. This is the section in which you should discuss your problem and present your opinion(s). Longer is better than shorter in this section. Say what ethical theory or theories and professional-code sections you are using to arrive at your solution.  This should be a 2,100- to 2,800-word (or 6- to 8-page) paper, excluding cover page, abstract, and references, using APA formatting.

Competency Case Dilema-Week 5 Assignment

Competency Case Dilema-Week 5 Assignment

Competency Case Dilemma
In a 1,050- to 1,400-word (or 3- to 4-page) paper (excluding references and title page), discuss a competency-related scenario or a case of your choice, either from our readings or related to a situation that you have encountered in which you address the specific steps you would take to embrace ethical practices in your work. In what ways does the scenario you have selected present an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues? In what way does your professional code of conduct offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution? What are the implications of your ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for you as a professional? In addition to the required readings, cite at least two additional references.
Point Value: 9 Points
Assignment Rubric
Description: In a 1,050- to 1,400-word (or 3- to 4-page) paper (excluding references and title page), discuss a competency-related scenario or case of your choice from our readings or related to a situation that you have encountered in which you address the specific steps you would take to embrace ethical practices in your work. In what ways does the scenario you have selected present an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues? In what way does your professional code of conduct offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution? What are the implications of your ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for you as a professional? In addition to the required readings, cite at least two additional references.
Total Possible Score: 9.00
Discusses a competency-related scenario or case and the specific steps to embrace ethical practices in your work
Total: 1.35
Thoroughly discusses a competency-related scenario or case and the specific steps to embrace ethical practices in your work.
Discusses in detail a competency-related scenario or case and the specific steps to embrace ethical practices in your work.
Discusses a competency-related scenario or case and the specific steps to embrace ethical practices in your work
Superficially discusses a competency-related scenario or case and the specific steps to embrace ethical practices in your work.
Does not discuss a competency-related scenario or case or the specific steps to embrace ethical practices in your work.
Outlines how the scenario presents an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues.
Total: 1.35
Comprehensively outlines how the scenario presents an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues.
Fully outlines how the scenario presents an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues.
Outlines how the scenario presents an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues.
Briefly outlines how the scenario presents an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues
Does not outline how the scenario presents an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues.
Explains how the professional code of conduct may offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution
Total: 1.35
Thoroughly explains how the professional code of conduct may offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution
Explains in detail how the professional code of conduct may offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution.
Explains how the professional code of conduct may offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution
Explains briefly how the professional code of conduct may offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution.
Does not explain how the professional code of conduct may offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution
Details the implications of the ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for the student as a professional.
Total: 1.35
Thoroughly details the implications of the ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for the student as a professional
Describes in detail the implications of the ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for the student as a professional
Details the implications of the ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for the student as a professional.
Briefly details the implications of the ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for the student as a professional
Does not detail the implications of the ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for the student as a professional.
Research
Total: 1.80
5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials.  The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
 
3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials.  The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials.  The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
Writing and Organization
Total: 1.80
5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.
 
 
4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.
3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.
2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.
1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting.
Powered by Powered by Logo

Family Systems versus Individual

Family Systems versus Individual

cid:D7D4B297-EEAE-4174-AD01-F87097282051@canyon.com
PCN-500 Family Systems Theory versus Individual Theories Worksheet
Directions: Choose one family systems theory (Bowenian, Structural, or Strategic) and one individual counseling theory studied in this course such as (CBT, REBT, or Person Centered) and compare the two theories. Complete the specific fields listed in the chart for each theory chosen. Provide a 25- to 50-word response for each field. Provide an in-text citation in each field as appropriate and include a full reference below.

Family Systems Individual Counseling
Theory <Enter Theory Chosen> <Enter Theory Chosen>
Roles of the Counselor & Client
Strengths of the Approach
Limitations of the Approach
Appropriate Scenarios for Using the Approach
Appropriate Therapy Methods (Include 2 to 3)
Important Ethical Considerations

References:
© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Structural and Strategic theories

Select one of the following theories that you feel best applies to treating the client in the case study:

  1. Bowen Family Systems
  2. Structural
  3. Strategic

Write a 750-1,000-word analysis of the case study using the theory you chose. Include the following in your analysis.

  1. What concepts of the theory make it the most appropriate for the client in the case study?
  2. Why did you choose this theory over the others?
  3. What will be the goals of counseling and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish those goals?
  4. Is the theory designed for short- or long-term counseling?
  5. What will be the counselor’s role with this client?
  6. What is the client’s role in counseling?
  7. For what population(s) is this theory most appropriate? How does this theory address the social and cultural needs of the client?
  8. What additional information might be helpful to know about this case?
  9. What may be a risk in using this approach?

Include at least three scholarly references in your paper.
 
Case Study Analysis 
Client Name: Ana
Client age: 24
Gender: F
Presenting Problem
Client states, “I recently lost my job and feel hopeless. I can’t sleep and don’t feel like eating.” Client also reports she has lost 10 pounds during the last two months. Client states that she is a solo parent and is worried about becoming homeless. Client states, “I worry all the time. I can’t get my brain to shut off. My husband is in the military and currently serving in an overseas combat zone for the next eight months. I worry about him all the time.”
Behavioral Observations
Client arrived 30 minutes early for her appointment. Client stated that she had never been in counseling before. Client depressed and anxious, as evidenced by shaking hands and tearfulness as she filled out her intake paperwork. Ana made little eye contact as she described what brought her into treatment. Client speech was halting. Client affect flat. Client appeared willing to commit to eight sessions of treatment authorized by her insurance company.
General Background
Client is a 24-year-old first-generation immigrant from Guatemala. Ana was furloughed from her job as a loan officer at local bank three months ago. Client reported that she was from a wealthy family in Guatemala, but does not want to ask for help. Client speaks fluent Spanish.
Education
Client has completed one year of college with a major in business. Client states that she left college after her son was born as she found it difficult to manage a baby, college, and a full-time job.
Family Background
Client is the middle of four siblings. Client has two older brothers and one younger sister. Client’s parents have been married for 27 years. Client states that she has had a “close” relationship with her family, although she states that her father is a “heavy drinker.” Client states that all her brothers and sisters have graduated from college and have professional careers. Client states that her father is a banker and her mother is an educator. Client states that she has not seen her family for 1 year. Client has a 1-year-old son and states that she is sometimes “overwhelmed” by raising him alone.
Major Stressors
· Lack of family and supportive friends
· Financial problems due to job loss
· Husband deployed overseas
· Raising a baby by herself

Cognitive theories

Cognitive theories emphasize the impact of thoughts on emotions and behaviors. Albert Ellis’s rational-emotive behavior therapy (REBT) involves the identification of irrational thoughts, the subsequent emotions, and the resulting behaviors using the A-B-C model. Treatment extends this to the A-B-C-D-E model, as those thoughts are disputed and alternative, more rational effects are the results:
Steps in the Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) ModelAActivating an eventBBelief about the eventCEmotional and behavioral consequences of the beliefDDispute or debate the beliefENew rational effects or beliefs and new emotions and new behaviors
Aaron Beck’s cognitive therapy (CT) is designed to identify dysfunctional thoughts as well; in his theory, they are referred to as “cognitive distortions.”
Types of Cognitive DistortionsAll-or-nothing thinking”Should” and “must” statementsOvergeneralizationLabeling and mislabelingMental filter and selective abstractionPersonalizationDisqualifying the positiveCatastrophizingJumping to conclusions and arbitrary inferencesMind readingMagnification or minimizationTunnel visionEmotional reasoning
Adapted from “Labeling the Distortion” by Seligman and Reichenberg (2014).

Tasks:

In a minimum of 200 words, post your responses to the following:
Read the case study of Aaron.
 
The Case of Aaron Aaron is a highly intelligent, 11-year-old son of an unemotional, overly intellectual, divorced woman who works as a mathematician at one of the Los Angeles missile and space laboratories. His father lives in another part of the country and has no contact with him. Aaron is often left home in the care of a neighbor while his mother works late or travels to professional conferences. Although Aaron is pleasant in appearance, his behavior is extremely disruptive. He runs from game to game and toy to toy in the counselor’s office, never letting the counselor help him to enjoy any one activity. He actively avoids the counselor’s offers to play. He behaves aggressively in a haphazard, unpredictable way, crying for the counselor’s attention, but becoming angry and withdrawn when she gives him some warmth. He tends to criticize his mother, often describing her as hostile and rejecting. He also criticizes his previous counselors at the clinic regarding their treatment of him. He expresses dissatisfaction with the clinic’s toys, playrooms, and lack of electronic/video games. He blames his failure to be happy on his mother, his missing father, school, or his previous counselors. He often tells the counselor that his mother does not like him. According to Aaron, his school is also bad, his teachers do not understand him, and the other kids pick on him. He reports that no one really cares about him and that he has no friends. Vocally and physically aggressive at times, he might with equal suddenness become withdrawn and almost detached from reality. He will start a game, then destroy it if he suffers even one minor setback. He walks away from outdoor play with the counselor, then returns to beg her for candy. He runs away, hides, and tries to make the counselor look for him all over the clinic. Continually begging for ice cream or for money, he becomes detached when his requests are refused. If difficult topics come up in sessions, he stops suddenly and runs, screams, or talks gibberish.
Based on the case study:

Now, address the following questions:

  • Is the cognitive approach a good fit for Aaron? Why or why not?
  • What type of client is best suited for cognitive therapy (CT)?
  • Is it most suitable for particular cultures, ages, genders, or presenting problems? Why or why not?

Support your rationale and analyses by using at least two resources from professional literature in your response. Professional literature may include the Argosy University online library resources; relevant textbooks; peer-reviewed journal articles; and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu or .gov).
Your discussion posts and all written assignments should reflect graduate-level writing skills and appropriate use of APA style, including in-text citations and references.
Here is one answer below by student, to help you do the work 200 words make it different from this post
 
The six cognitive distortions that apply to the case study of Aaron are: All-or-nothing thinking, when he goes from one activity to the next; mental filter and selective abstraction, when he insists on having the counselors full attention but pulls away when he feels she is too warm; disqualifying the positive, when he criticizes his mom, past counselors, and toys; jumping to conclusions and arbitrary inferences, when he claims his mother does not like him, teachers don’t understand him and nobody cares about him; magnification or minimization, when he blames his failure on his mom, dad, school, and counselors; and emotional reasoning, when he destroys games, shows sudden aggression, tantrum, and detachment as a response to any sort of discomfort  (Argosy University, 2014).
The activating events here lack of structure in his life, not get the necessary attention from his parents, wanting a “perfect” life, not receiving praise for achievements, not being accountable for his actions, and not being shown or exposed to healthy situations involving emotional responses. He believes he no one cares about him and therefore finds no reason to complete a task, needs attention, and criticizes those around him to make himself look better. His emotions and behavior, as a result, are unpredictable and out of control. He needs to dispute or debate each of his beliefs and really understand how each one is harming him more than those around him. He can then reinforce new rational beliefs about himself and others. These thoughts might be “I am valued and loved. My mom is just working hard because she loves me”; “I am responsible for communicating my problems with others, not acting out and shutting down.”; and “I am doing my best.”
I believe the Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) approach a good fit for Aaron, because it helps the client understand their thought process and how it effects how they are seeing and responding to the world around them. It is also short term and time limited, something I feel Aaron needs and as soon as possible. Why I really think is best about it is it’s “detachment” with the client. This form of therapy does not involve the bond or rapport. It simply jumps right into the problem thought areas and allows the client to discover how they are controlling how they react (Brief Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Demonstration, 2000).
In my opinion, cognitive therapy (CT) is more suited for clients who need a bond with their counselor in order to open up, as it takes on a more gentle tone (Demonstration of Cognitive Therapy, 1995).
It is most suitable for particular cultures, ages, genders, or presenting problems, because it takes on the approach that all problems stem from our thoughts. Therefore, all thoughts can be explored and understood by the client, as the thoughts are their own. Because of this, those thoughts can be transformed by the client themselves as well (Argosy University, 2014).
References
Argosy University. (2014). Module 4 lectures. Counseling Theory. Retrieved May 2017 from: http:myeclassonline.com
Argosy University. (2014). The Case of Aaron. Counseling Theory. Retrieved May 2017 from: http:myeclassonline.com
Brief Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Demonstration [Video file]. (2000). Milton H. Erickson Foundation. Retrieved May 26, 2017, from Academic Video Online: Premium.
Demonstration of Cognitive Therapy [Video file]. (1995). Milton H. Erickson Foundation. Retrieved May 26, 2017, from Academic Video Online: Premium.
Rose, W. (2006). REBT Self-Help Form. Retrieved May 2017 from: http://www.rebtnetwork.org/library/shf.html