Watch videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21d7sOyVGKg https://youtu.be/RNERSmkIUHo
•Evaluate Seth Goldman’s leadership performance on the concept of the “Triple Bottom Line” using at least two (2) examples from both resources (at least four [4] total examples) to support your evaluation.
Project Mng.
Assignment 1: Assess Organizational Readiness
Note: The assignments are a series of papers that are based on the same case, which is located in the Student Center of the course shell. The assignments are dependent upon one another.
Review the assigned case study and complete this assignment.
Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you: 1.Analyze how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Provide examples to support your analysis. 2.Determine the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Provide justification for your response. 3.Develop at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment. 4.Identify the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text). 5.Use at least four (4) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: •Analyze the critical success factors (CSFs), project benefits, and organizational readiness and risk culture of the company. •Apply the results of this analysis to the development of project risk recommendations. •Use technology and information resources to research issues in project risk management •Write clearly and concisely about project risk management using proper writing mechanics. writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 200
Assignment 1: Assess Organizational Readiness
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Analyze how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Provide examples to support your analysis.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Did not submit or incompletely provided examples to support your analysis.
Partially analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Partially provided examples to support your analysis.
Satisfactorily analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Satisfactorily provided examples to support your analysis.
Thoroughly analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Thoroughly provided examples to support your analysis.
2. Determine the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Provide justification for your response. Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for your response.
Partially determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Partially provided justification for your response.
Satisfactorily determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Satisfactorily provided justification for your response.
Thoroughly determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Thoroughly provided justification for your response.
3. Develop at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Partially developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Satisfactorily developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Thoroughly developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
4. Identify the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Partially identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Satisfactorily identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Thoroughly identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
5. 4 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Note: The assignments are a series of papers that are based on the same case, which is located in the Student Center of the course shell. The assignments are dependent upon one another.
Review the assigned case study and complete this assignment.
Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you: 1.Analyze how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Provide examples to support your analysis. 2.Determine the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Provide justification for your response. 3.Develop at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment. 4.Identify the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text). 5.Use at least four (4) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: •Analyze the critical success factors (CSFs), project benefits, and organizational readiness and risk culture of the company. •Apply the results of this analysis to the development of project risk recommendations. •Use technology and information resources to research issues in project risk management •Write clearly and concisely about project risk management using proper writing mechanics. writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 200
Assignment 1: Assess Organizational Readiness
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Analyze how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Provide examples to support your analysis.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Did not submit or incompletely provided examples to support your analysis.
Partially analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Partially provided examples to support your analysis.
Satisfactorily analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Satisfactorily provided examples to support your analysis.
Thoroughly analyzed how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Thoroughly provided examples to support your analysis.
2. Determine the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Provide justification for your response. Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for your response.
Partially determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Partially provided justification for your response.
Satisfactorily determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Satisfactorily provided justification for your response.
Thoroughly determined the project benefits, organizational readiness, and risk culture of the company in the case study. Thoroughly provided justification for your response.
3. Develop at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Partially developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Satisfactorily developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
Thoroughly developed at least three (3) project risk recommendations based on the analysis from criteria number 1 and 2 of this assignment.
4. Identify the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Partially identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Satisfactorily identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
Thoroughly identified the initial categories of risk (RBS Level 1 and 2) that you see as being present in the case study using the Example Risk Checklist (Figure A-2, Hillson & Simon text).
5. 4 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Law and ethics
Assignment 1: Facebook Live Killings Due Week 4 and worth 280 points
Read the article Cleveland Shooting Highlight’s Facebook’s Responsibility in Policing Depraved Videos found at: http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/cleveland-shooting-highlights-facebook-s-responsibility-policing-depraved-videos-n747306
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you: 1.Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim. 2.Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites. 3.Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted. 4.Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles. 5.Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform. 6.Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: •Analyze and apply the concepts of ethical decision making, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility •Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance. •Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics. and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 280 Assignment 1: Facebook Live Killings
Criteria
Unacceptable Below 70% F
Fair 70-79% C
Proficient 80-89% B
Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Partially discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Satisfactorily discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Thoroughly discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
2. Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Partially suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Satisfactorily suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Thoroughly suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
3. Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Partially proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Satisfactorily proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Thoroughly proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
4. Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they did not submit or incompletely discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they did not submit or incompletely debated on whether or not they should create these roles.
Partially determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they partially discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they partially debated on whether or not they should create these roles.
Satisfactorily determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they satisfactorily discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they satisfactorily debated on whether or not they should create these roles.
Thoroughly determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they thoroughly discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they thoroughly debated on whether or not they should create these roles.
5. Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
Partially proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
Satisfactorily proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
Thoroughly proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
6. 2 references Weight: 5%
No references provided
Statistics
1. The manager of a computer help desk operation has collected enough data to conclude that the distribution of time per call is normally distributed with a mean equal to 8.21 minutes and a standard deviation of 2.14 minutes. The manager has decided to have a signal system attached to the phone so that after a certain period of time, a sound will occur on his employees’ phone if he exceeds the time limit. The manager wants to set the time limit at a level such that it will sound on only 8 percent of all calls. What is the time limit should be?
Business Assignment
Security Monitoring
Considering your place of employment or your home computing environment, discuss in detail the way in which in-depth (or layered) defense is employed to enhance security in your chosen environment. According to the textbook, Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), which can be categorized as Host IDS (HIDS) and Network IDS (NIDS), is a means of providing real-time monitoring. Compare and contrast HIDS and NIDS, and provide at least one (1) example identifying when one (1) would be more appropriate to use over the other. Provide a rationale to support your chosen example.
Procedural Law and the Bill of Rights
Assignment 1: Procedural Law and the Bill of Rights Due Week 4 and worth 200 points
The Bill of Rights finds its roots in documents such as the British Magna Carta of 1215 AD. It was one of the first documents that provided the common man independence from a monarch. It did imply that the federal government’s law dominated all others; however, it gave each state control of any laws outside of those reserved to the federal government. The Bill of Rights acts as a blueprint that every individual state uses to protect the rights of individual citizens. In this assignment, you will utilize the various concepts found in the Bill of Rights to provide the foundation of the various sections of the question.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
Compare and contrast two (2) of the sources of rights and fundamental principles found in the United States’ legal system as outlined by the text. Critically analyze and discuss two (2) steps of the criminal justice process from arrest to imprisonment. Identify and discuss the particular amendment related to arrest, search and seizures. Compare and contrast the concepts of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. In your own words, explain how they are similar or different. Examine and discuss the two (2) examples in which the exclusionary rule may not apply. Identify and discuss one (1) contemporary issue or case law related to the use of force. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Research and analyze procedures governing the process of arrest through trial. Critically debate the Constitutional safeguards of key Amendments with specific attention to the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments. Describe the difference between searchers, warrantless searches, and stops. Use technology and information resources to research issues in the criminal procedure. Write clearly and concisely about the criminal procedure using proper writing mechanics.
Neurodevelopmental and Neurocognitive Disorders Paper
Write a 1,500- to 1,750-word paper on the following: Describe one neurodevelopmental disorder and one neurocognitive disorder. Discuss behavioral criteria for each disorder. Discuss incidence rates and causes for each disorder. Propose two options for treatment for each disorder, based on two different theoretical models. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines
Evidence-Based Strategies
The Importance of Planning Evidence-Based Strategies for Teaching Students with Disabilities Based on your textbook and readings throughout this course, why is it so important to be able to use effective instructional strategies in your lessons? Why is it critical that you consider the needs of students with disabilities when planning instruction? Support your assertions by citing at least two peer-reviewed sources.
Resource Managment
Assignment 1: HR Management Due Week 2 and worth 125 points Imagine you are the HR manager at a company, and an employee came to you upset because she felt a male co-worker had sexually harassed her by repeatedly asking her out on dates even after she said “no.” What would you do? Write a one (1) page paper in which you: Formulate the conversation you would have with the employee
Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements: Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Explain the human resource management process, its role in supporting the overall organizational strategies, and the various functions involved in human resource management. Explain the key provisions of major government legislation affecting human resource management, including equal employment opportunity, affirmative action, health and safety, and labor relations. Use technology and information resources to research issues in human resource management. Write clearly and concisely about human resource management using proper writing mechanics.