Category: Uncategorized

In POA, read the essay Bust the Amateur Myth by Frank DeFord on pp. 139-40. Then, read the Arguing Like a Citizen section found on pp. 140-141. Then, complete the Activty found at the bottom of page 141 in the Aruging like a Citizen section. Create a basic four sentence outline based on your opinion/claim concerning compensation for college athletes. Your DB Post should follow the format outlined in the book: Claim: Support: because…. Logical warrant: Contextual warrant:

TOPIC: Prescription, Nonprescription and Herbal Medications: Exploring Interactions in the Geriatric Population Purpose: To examine the issue of polypharmacy in the geriatric population. Drug therapy in the elderly presents a special challenge as older patients are more sensitive to drugs and demonstrate wider individual responses. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS: Introduction:​Student is to address current demographics of the geriatric population (numbers by age group over 50 years of age, gender, marital status, ethnicity, household income, educational level, etc. Address any demographic information you believe impacts or influences an elderly persons participation in a medication regimen. Section I:​Discuss specific physiologic changes that occur with aging and how those changes affect absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs. Section 2:​Delineate factors that predispose older patients to adverse drug reactions. Section 3:​1. Select two of the following classes of medications (analgesics, antihistamines, antihypertensives, antidepressants) ​​2. Identify 3 commonly prescribed medications in each class – discuss the mechanism of action of each of the medications (Example: Toradol, Darvon, Lortab) ​​3. Identify 3 commonly used nonprescriptive medications from the same class as those meds discussed in Section 3.2() – discuss the mechanism of action of each of the three nonprescription medications (Example: Acetaminophen, Aspirin, Ibuprofen) ​​4. Identify 3 alternative or complimentary therapies advertised to address the same physiologic needs as the classes of medications identified in Section 3.2. Discuss the mechanism of action of each of the three complimentary therapies. Section 4:​Based on the mechanism of action of each of the classes of medications discussed, describe potential drug interactions about which the NP should question or assess the patient. Conclusion:​Summarize comments References: include citations from a MINIMUM of 5 peer-reviewed professional nursing journals. Research articles may be included, required textbook is not to be counted as reference. APA format required. Minimum of 10 pages, excluding title page and references.

Instructions Compare and contrast timed mini-essay Do not attempt this quiz until you have read all the paired articles from this week. When you begin the essay, you’ll be asked to compare and contrast two specific passages from this week’s textbook readings. (The articles will appear within the quiz itself.) You won’t know ahead of time which two articles you’ll be asked to write about, so make sure you’ve read all this week’s assigned selections before you attempt the quiz. You may prepare for this timed essay-writing quiz by preparing outlines. However, do not write an essay or essays ahead of time and upload them. Quiz prompts are shuffled randomly. Each student will receive a unique prompt, so do not hit up your classmates for quiz info. After you’ve begun the quiz, I advise you to compose your essay in Word or another software program, then copy/paste it into this Quiz (within time constraints). Your essay is not expected to be perfect. Use the writing skills you’ve learned this session (see rubric below). Do your best. You may not use any internet or human resources, aside from our class textbook and your own brain, during the quiz. The quiz is due by the end of this week, Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. The quiz locks after this time and becomes inaccessible. You may attempt the quiz once only. Ensure you have a secure online connection and power source. There will be no quiz re-takes. Claims that battery died, wifi disconnected, time expired, textbook was consumed by pet mongoose, etc., will not be accepted. 180 minutes (= three hours). Ten points. Compare and contrast quiz rubric /4 grammar, punctuation, mechanics /4 evidence, MLA citations, supporting details /2 organization, flow /10 TOTAL

Drug & alcohol abuse among college students in general Ø What is your Program Goal(s)? Ø What is your Program Objective(s)? 3-5 objectives Note: for this section, repeat of your lit review. Use your data, tell reader what your program will accomplish. Example: …”the goal of this program is to… Present your program goal, 3-5 objectives, and a brief explanation of why you chose each objective. Be sure to distinguish “big picture” goals and “concrete, measureable” objectives. This section should be one-two pages. · What is your program goal? · What are your program objectives? · Why did you choose each objective?

Topic: Problems that students face Type: Documented persuasive essay Purpose: To convince the reader to believe as the author does using documented evidence Sources: 7 Quoted 5 non internet 3 different magazine or journal sources Length: 3 pages 1 Bibliography page

An outline+ bibliography one to two pages outline due in two days

Your fellow project managers provided you with their thoughts on your tool selection during your weekly working lunch meeting. You have considered them and have developed your schedule, budget, and methods for monitoring and controlling those areas. You must now complete the Project Executing and Project Monitoring and Controlling sections of the Project Management Plan. Update your existing Project Charter/Project Management Plan template to reflect the following: Performing quality assurance: Discuss the tools and techniques, such as quality audits, quality management tools, and process analyses, you will use to perform quality assurance for your project. Managing the project team: Determine how you will manage the project team, including handling conflict and providing motivation. Conducting procurements: Discuss any of the items you need to purchase for your project and the types of vendors, contractors, and suppliers you will encounter. Controlling costs: Determine the methods, such as earned value management, forecasting, to-complete performance indices, project management software, and reserve analyses, you will use to ensure costs are controlled within the project. Controlling risks: Discuss the methods you will use to control the risks in the project. These methods can include risk reassessment, risk audits, variance analysis, reserve analysis, meetings, and technical performance measurement. Managing stakeholder engagement: Using the list of stakeholders defined in Unit 1, discuss how you will manage the engagement level of the stakeholders.

This is for a Com-103 speech class. Persuasive speech to be roughly 6-7 minutes long. Purpose of the speech is to support important causes, change audience beliefs and attitudes, and motivate their behaviors about something that is important to or of interest to you. There needs to be a “call to action” or “resolution” in the conclusion. Must make either pathos or logos appeal in the speech. Minimum of 3 sources, and must be cited properly Speech should have an introduction, body, and conclusion.

It’s a presentation of the tragic hero of the great Gatsby which is it gatsby

Discussion 1 Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 11 in the text, the articles by Baez (2013), Hogan, Barrett, and Hogan (2007), Morgeson, Campion, and Dipboye (2007), Peterson, Griffith, Isaacson, O’Connell, and Mangos (2011), and the Maximizing Human Potential Within Organizations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Building Better Organizations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and Top Minds and Bottom Lines (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. brochures on the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) website. Evaluate the MMP1-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Reports for Mr. C (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. and Ms. D. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. For this discussion, you will take on the role of an industrial-organizational psychologist recently awarded a contract to evaluate potential police candidates. The purpose of the evaluations is to determine the psychological capability of the applicants to be certified as police officers in your state. The applicants you are examining are applying for certification and will be vested with a position of public trust. If certified as police officers, the individuals will likely be required at some future time to exercise significant physical strength and undergo high emotional stress. As the examining psychologist, you are required to comment on the applicants’ social comprehension, judgment, impulse control, potential for violence, and/or any psychological traits that might render her or him psychologically at risk to be certified. The state requires that each applicant’s examination include the following elements: Interview and History: The psychologist must personally interview the applicant and provide a summary of the applicant’s personal, educational, employment, and criminal history. Required Personality Test: The applicant shall be administered any current standard form of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) by the licensed psychologist who interviewed the individual, or by a paraprofessional employed by and under the direct control and supervision of that licensed psychologist. Other Testing Methods: If (after conducting the required test) the licensed psychologist is unable to certify the applicant’s psychological capability or risk to exercise appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer, the psychologist is directed to personally employ whatever other psychological measuring instrument(s) and/or technique(s) deemed necessary to form her or his professional opinion. The use of any such instrument(s) and/or technique(s) requires a full and complete written explanation to the commission. For the purposes of this discussion, assume the interview and history information reported to you by Mr. C. and Ms. D. is unremarkable and that neither candidate communicated anything to you during the interview that raised concerns about her or his capabilities to exercise appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer. Review the MMP1-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Reports for Mr. C. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and Ms. D. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and evaluate the professional interpretation of this testing and assessment data from an ethical perspective. In your initial post, communicate your conclusions about Mr. C. and Ms. D., either recommending certification or communicating reservations. After you have made your decision, begin the section on each candidate with one of the following statements, identifying each candidate by name. To recommend certification: I have examined [insert applicant’s name], and it is my professional opinion that this person is psychologically capable of exercising appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer. Follow the above statement with a one-paragraph rationale for your conclusion based on the available test results. Follow the rationale with a brief comparison of any additional assessment instruments you might consider administering beyond the MMPI-2-RF. Debate the pros and cons of the potential use of other assessments. Explain any ethical implications that may arise from the interpretation of this data. To communicate reservations: I have examined [insert applicant’s name], and it is my professional opinion that this person is psychologically at risk for exercising appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer. Follow the statement with a one-paragraph rationale for your conclusion based on the available test results. Follow the rationale with a brief comparison of any additional assessment instruments you recommend administering beyond the MMPI-2-RF. Debate the pros and cons of using other assessments. DIscussion 2: For this discussion, you will use the PSY640 Checklist for Evaluating Tests (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. document to compare two assessment instruments used in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology assessment. Based on the information in your text and assigned readings, select and evaluate two psychological tests used in industrial-organizational psychological assessment. You may not evaluate any of the tests you evaluated in the Week Four Applications in Personality Testing discussion. In addition to the text, locate a minimum of two appropriate scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources to aid you in the analysis of the psychometric properties of the instruments based on published data. In your initial post, provide the names of the two tests you evaluated, and attach your completed PSY640 Checklist for Evaluating Tests document (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. You must maintain the original format of the document and include the textbook and two additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources in the references section.