Category: Uncategorized

Search the Internet for nonprofit organizations that have either an innovative or a highly recognized brand and choose five for this project. Research your five chosen organizations and compare them in a table with the following column headings: Column One: Name of the NPO Column Two: Describe the Brand Column Three: Briefly describe the purpose of the NPO Column Four: Explain the way the NPO conducts fundraising efforts Your table should have five rows (one for each NPO) and four columns (as noted above) Immediately following the table that you create, provide one paragraph for each NPO you chose. In each paragraph, evaluate the brand and the fundraising efforts. Are they effective? Why and how are they effective? Are they ineffective? Why and how are they ineffective? Length: 8–10 pages, not including the title and reference pages References: Support your work with a minimum of five scholarly resources, current APA standards.

For this management assignment, you are required to devise an original event proposal, based on a scenario of a small scale arts festival in Digbeth, Birmingham.
Tasks:
1. Critically identify the range of events and categorise them in line with an academic event typology.
2. Critically evaluate the role of the public, private and voluntary sectors (or a combination) in events provision.
3. Critically evaluate the impacts that events provision can have on visitor perceptions and residents attitudes.
4. Critically identify, and evaluate the planning issues for your chosen event, including venue, theme, programme, entertainments.
5. Critically define the various organisational structures of events teams and apply the structure most suited to your event.
6. Analyse and apply the different marketing techniques your group will consider for the event. Evaluate the potential success of the chosen techniques.
7. Critically explain the financial objectives of your event and possible sources of income, to include sponsorship opportunities
8. Investigate the legal and risk management issues applicable to the event.
9. Analyse the methods you would use to measure the effectiveness of the event.

Descriptive statistics are an important part of public health research. Nearly every quantitative research project starts with descriptive statistics. Descriptive statistics summarize the data in a meaningful way and describe the basic features of the data. Descriptive statistics can take many forms. They may include numeric and/or graphical representations of the data. They may explain the central tendency or spread of the data. They also may help to reveal certain characters for further analysis or identify potential variables for inferential analysis. For this Discussion, review the descriptive statistics you are using for your Scholar Practitioner Project. ASSIGNMENT Post a description of the statistics you will include in your descriptive analysis for your Scholar Practitioner Project. Explain the rationale behind using these specific statistics, including which statistics you chose not to use and why. Support your response with the Learning Resources and current literature.( THE TOPIC FOR THE PROJECT IS EFFECT OF OBESITY ON BREAST CANCER) Required Readings Marshall, G., & Jonker, L. (2010a). A concise guide to… descriptive statistics. Synergy, 22–25. McHugh, M. L. (2003a). Descriptive statistics, part I: Level of measurement. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 8(1), 35–37. McHugh, M. L. (2003b). Descriptive statistics, part II: Most commonly used descriptive statistics. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 8(3), 111–116. Thebane, L., & Akhtar-Danesh, N. (2008). Guidelines for reporting descriptive statistics in health research. Nurse Researcher, 15(2), 72–81.

the topic of the research paper will be “the heritage of the Columbia street in the downtown region of New Westminster has been preserved because it brings diversity.

Critique a paper about cyber bullying and write an essay about it with intro body and conclusion. 675-825 words. The attached file is the paper you’re going to critique. Thanks

Post a brief description of your dissertation topic and an explanation of the purpose of your study. Explain how your dissertation research might effect social change. Be specific and use examples to illustrate your explanation. (The dissertation topic is effect of obesity on breast cancer) READINGS reswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chapter 4, “Writing Strategies and Ethical Consideration” (pp. 77-101) Chapter 6, “The Purpose Statement” (pp. 123–137) http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php

Satire is still just as relevant in our contemporary culture as it was during Swift’s and Pope’s days. In the spirit of Swift and Pope, write your own satirical response to some contemporary issue or trend in American culture–approximately 500 (about 2 pages, double spaced with standard margins & 12 pt. font size). Your response can be in any form–essay, fictional account, even poetic form, but somehow identify the topic in your title. Remember that satire hinges often on exaggeration or understatement and contains irony.

12 font, Times New Roman. 1 inch margins. Pages numbered. Use APA rules for in-text citation and end-of-paper references. 2. NO quotes allowed. Paraphrase is strongly encouraged. It’s a Turnitin assignment, so > 20% match will be unfavorable to the grade assigned. Grammar will be 50% of the grade. 3. Use this link to view the movie, unless you have another way to see it for free: https://vimeo.com/36787755 4. Use the following general format for the paper: Introduction of the movie and what you plan to discuss in the paper Present major themes of the movie, especially related to health Relate the movie themes to the books discussion of economics, government, law and society. Is what’s presented in the movie as related to food sustainable for the population and society? Talk about health. Use a minimal of 7 outside resources, preferably academic journal articles to support your views

First two pages- select three journal articles related to the effect of air pollution on human health. Articles should be on or after 2010. Abstracts 1, 2, 3 – use your own words to explain the interesting findings of the articles that are related to the topic that you want to talk about and supports the conclusions that you will reach later. DO NOT list the titles in the paper you are writing, they should be referenced at the end APA style. The bottom line is that this is a single research paper of a topic related to health and environment. Discuss the health effects of air pollution and why the abstracts supports your conclusion. Critique the articles as what’s good and not so good about them. Is the methods used wrong? Do the findings meet your expectations? etc. Provide personal examples that may be related to the subject matter. -Next two pages (450 words)-Watch the movie (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xvz_m5uPV4s) and discuss the following. Use supported evidence where possible. Follow the rules listed below. What’s movie about? Give a brief description of the main topics presented. What are the main environmental and health concerns presented? Provide 2 examples of each from the movie. Think back to module 1 where we discussed the triple bottom line, what about each of the three bottom lines here, is there a balance or some bottom lines have outplaced others? Since this movie came out, there have been new concerns raised related to fracking. Research and find 3 instances related to fracking and its impact on economic, environmental, health and safety that are currently being talked about. e.g. Oklahoma and earthquakes. We live in Texas where energy is a main driver of our economy. What’s your own opinion on the topic, especially related to health? Find supporting evidence to your argument

This paper is an argumentative Synthesis. It must be based on the story Serving in America ISBN: 978-1-4576-0671-7 and the first chapter of the book $2.00 a day by Kathryn J. Edin & H. Luke Shaefer. 2 (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/) and search for the needed information (Purdue Owl is an extremely useful tool). Best of luck! BN 3 Class: WRIT 201 Instructor: Ben Nickol Document: Paper II Assignment The assignment for Paper II is to write an argumentative synthesis. An argumentative synthesis can be understood as an explanatory synthesis (Paper I) that also:  Provides a source you yourself locate using the Helena College Library databases  Articulates your own opinion about the subject discussed To write Paper II, choose one of the articles we read from CHAPTER FOUR—Money and Success. Those articles are: -“Sam Walton / Jay Z” by Packer -“Serving in Florida” by Ehrenreich -“From Beyond Outrage” by Reich -“From a Tangle of Pathology to a Race-Fair America” by Aja, et al. Once you’ve chosen your article, you then want to go online to the Helena College Library website and begin searching for a second article that you believe “speaks” to the first. As with Paper I, you’re looking for an article that (a) reinforces the other article’s perspectives/points, (b) disputes the other article’s perspectives/points or (c) does both. To conduct this search, you want to use one of the databases the library provides. You can use any database you wish, but I recommend starting with Ebsco (http://web.b.ebscohost.com.hctproxy.lib.umt.edu:7048/ehost/search/advanced?vid=1&sid=bee76427-be35-4861-a0af-e790f37e8493%40sessionmgr103). NOTE: To access this site, you may have to sign in with your Helena College credentials. Finally, when searching for an article make sure it is both credible (published by a respected scholar, writer or journalist) and current (nothing older than 2005). Once you’ve obtained this article, you then want to reflect about the issues brought up in the two articles (the one you found and the one from Chapter Four) and decide what you personally would like to add to the discussion. This will enter the paper as your own argument. You can either (a) agree with a point one or both of the articles make and develop it further, (b) dispute a point one or both of the articles make and explain why you disagree with it or (c) introduce and support a new point about the subject. What follows is a suggested outline for your paper: I. Introduction (1 paragraph) a. Contextualize the topic. b. Explain what about the topic is interesting or controversial. c. Introduce the two authors, their two articles, and explain what those articles are about or argue. d. Articulate your own position. e. Provide a plan statement/thesis that explains to the reader what your paper will do. (“This paper will synthesize [the articles you’ve chosen] and argue [your own argument about the topic].”) II. Article from book (2 paragraphs) a. Summarize a point or points made (or implied) in the article you’ve chosen from the book. III. Article from database (2 paragraphs) a. Explain how a point or points in this article can be read as reinforcing or disputing the point(s) made in the previous article. IV. Your Argument (2 paragraphs) a. Articulate what points from the preceding four paragraphs you agree with or disagree with (and why), or else branch out and make a new point, or points, of your own. V. Conclusion (1 paragraph) a. Review the ground you’ve covered in this paper and emphasize your stance and the logic behind it. Length: 8 paragraphs 4 Due Date (VIA EMAIL ATTACHMENT): 7/24 Citation: For WRIT 201 papers, it’s very important to use proper MLA in-text citation, and to provide a full works cited page. If you’re unsure what this entails, consult your Pocket Guide from WRIT 101 or go online to Purdue Owl (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/) and search for the needed information (Purdue Owl is an extremely useful tool). Best of luck!