Category: Uncategorized

Your goal for this essay is to evaluate the costs and benefits of a project or plan. The project or plan on which you focus should be as close to home as possible—it should be located in your town, state, region, or even in a specific, familiar place. The project or plan you choose to evaluate could be a proposed response to an issue in the government, the education system, the environment, etc. In other words, you could choose an issue (such as unemployment in Pennsylvania), find a large-scale plan that has been proposed to solve the issue (such as a specific policy change), and weigh the costs and benefits in terms of money, time, environmental safety, and/or human life or quality of life. Think of this study as a “pros and cons” essay that ends with your conclusion, based on your research, about whether or not the project should be started or the plan should be enacted, and why. Imagine your audience to be a section of the public that is only generally familiar with the issue. Format: -This essay must be written in APA format, with a Title Page, Abstract, Body, and References. -The essay must be 5-6 pages long, typed in Times New Roman font, and double-spaced. The Title Page, Abstract, and References do not count toward the 5-6 page requirement. Sources: -This essay requires at least 6 researched sources, such as books, newspapers, magazines, journals, government documents, or expert interviews. -Only academic-type sources will be accepted—print sources, sources from the library online, or credible online sources ending in “.edu,” “.gov,” or “.org.” The use of Wikipedia or general websites ending in “.com” will not be accepted; online newspapers can, however, end in “.com.” -Any source you consult for this essay must be used in in-text citations and listed in the References page. Style: -Write in a formal tone; do not use “I” or “you.” -Images and graphs are not required and will not count toward the 5-6 page requirement. the assignment is more to find a plan or project that is already being discussed on more of a community or political level, not on a personal level. Topic: whether or not certain changes to planned parenthood are feasible?

You may include one or a few aspects of the capital punishment from the list in the paper: – Your opinion on death penalty – Impact on the society at large – Contemporary views on death penalty – Views from main ethical theories – Legal status in US and/or other countries

Qualitative Research Report
MSc Psychology
Qualitative Research Report – 50% of the final grade
Aim of the qualitative project
This assignment aims to test your ability to analyse qualitative interview data and write up a qualitative research report. You will be using interview data that you have collected.
Instructions
Word limit: 1,500 words. The 1,500 word limit applies to the main body of the text (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion and Conclusions). It does not include the abstract, the table of participants and table of themes, the quotes used in the results section, the references, or the appendices.
During the first session on interviews and focus groups you will get into groups of ideally five students (between four and six students per group is acceptable). This will form your research group. Through discussion within your group, and in consultation with the module leader, you will define your topic for your qualitative research project, design a semi-structured interview schedule, participant information sheet, and consent form.
In your own time (ideally during reading week) you will conduct one semi-structured interview lasting approximately 20-30 minutes using the participant information sheet, consent form and interview schedule. You will then transcribe and anonymise your transcript and share this with other members, who will also share their transcripts with you.*
During the second seminar session in Week 6 you will have the opportunity to analyse your interview transcripts. It is recommended that you use thematic analysisfor the analysis. However, groups or individuals that wish to use a different analytic method are able to if they receive the approval of the module leader.
Each student must produce an individual write-up of their qualitative research study. This write-up can be based on the themes identified during the group analysis of the transcripts or on further qualitative data analysis conducted by the individual student. Thus, the writing up of the report is not a collaborative effort. Whilst all reports will be scrutinised for plagiarism prior to marking, the nature of any plagiarism will form the basis of this scrutiny. That is, it is accepted that different reports from the same group are likely to share some features in common such as description of interview questions, names of themes, and quotes used to illustrate these themes.
*Please note that any student who does not engage with the group activity for this assignment and who does not produce an interview transcript that is shared with whole group, will be required to conduct their own study collecting at least three interviews, analysing the data, and writing up a research report.
Writing up your project
The structure of your assignment needs to follow the general requirements of scientific journals.
1. Title:
• Brief
• Explicitly state qualitative methodology
• Include method of analysis
2. Abstract:
• Purpose
• Methods (including study design and statistical methods)
• Results
• Discussion
3. Introduction
• The focus and rationale for the study supported by literature.
4. Methodology
• Participants with table of participants (table not included in word count)
• Design
• The interview
• Procedure
• Ethical considerations
• Data analysis method
5. Results
• Table of themes and sub-themes (not included in word count)
• Description of themes, illustration of themes (using quotes), interpretation of themes
• The results section can focus on a selected number of themes and does not need to cover all of the themes identified during analysis
• Illustrate themes with selected quotes (quotes not included in word count)
• Analyse rather than describe
6. Discussion and Conclusion
• Pull together your findings
• Refer back to the existing literature during Discussion
• Briefly describe any strengths and weaknesses of your study
• End with a brief summary of what you found, situate your results in the context of what is currently known about your topic. Make suggestion as to how/if your findings could be useful in practice and if further research in this area could be useful.
7. References
8. Appendices:
• Copy of participant information sheet and consent form (unsigned)
• Copy of semi-structured interview schedule
• Full,anonymisedinterview transcript preferably with coding (coding can be handwritten)
• Any additional workings demonstrating how the final table of themes was generated

? Methodology of the literature review
? Literature review framework (classify literature using a framework (theoretical, analytical [technology? or social).[e.g Technology framework – Web 1.0, 2.0 or 3.0 or gamification framework].
? Results &Discussion
? Conclusion

Assignment
Doctoral Learning Strategies
Details:
The purpose of the assignment is to demonstrate your working knowledge of APA format by writing a paper.
The doctoral Learning process is uniquely autonomous. It is important to develop individual plans for success and use personal strategies to reach your goals.
General Requirements:
• Review the APA Quiz questions prior to beginning work on your paper.
• When writing this paper ensure you are speaking from a formal standpoint and are not using I-statements.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
825 words, construct a paper that addresses the following.
1. Discuss learning experiences one may face prior to the doctoral learning experience. Support your discussion with scholarly evidence.
2. Research the autonomous nature of doctoral learning. Discuss how doctoral programs and learning skills and strategies employed when completing them is different than other learning experience.
3. Conduct a literature review of five scholarly articles related to strategies for success in doctoral programs.
4. Based upon your research discuss specific strategies you recommend when developing a plan for successful completion of a doctoral program.

write about either one of these question in 200-500 words
Focus Questions:
How have you experienced a spiritual connection with food? Why do you consider this connection to be spiritual?
OR
How is social justice a spiritual issue? Give a rationale for your answer.

Now that your team has a better understanding of the population served by the organization, you need to evaluate how able the organization is to serve the specific health care needs of the population identified in the Windshield Survey assessment.
Use the recommended resources to locate at least three academic or professional resources to use in this assessment.
Follow the same formatting instructions that you used in the Windshield Survey assessment. Your assessment should be done as a report for your team, using APA formatting for in-text citations and references.
Requirements
In your organizational evaluation, complete the following:
Describe the primary health concern for a vulnerable or diverse population.
Explain how the organization currently serves this health care concern. Be sure you include information on how the organization communicates to the population.
Identify gaps in the health care service provided to the population.
Explain evidence-based strategies to bridge the gaps in health care service provided to the population.
Identify any possible barriers to implementing your strategies.
Additional Requirements
Include a title page and reference page. The completed assessment should be 2–4 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.
Reference at least three current scholarly or professional resources.
Use current APA format for citations and references.
Use Times New Roman font, 12 point.
Double space.

The aim of this paper is to structure the research field on lean and green manufacturing in the context of relationship, benefit and its effect on performance and point out the most important gaps.
Focus on impact on the environment, social, economic. Significantly, my work should relate with supply chain because I study in supply chain management filed.
The importance thing is could you do the table compare of each company and could you follow dissertation style from my example. For the word count you can do appropriately in each part.

Overview:
Before you can conduct an analysis of a political leader in a specific context, you must first create a statesmanship framework by which to analyze that leader. This paper requires you to conduct scholarly research on the general idea of statesmanship: its definition, its attributes, how those attributes compare to pseudo-statesmanship, and how the political leaders we have discussed in the course demonstrate statesmanship via decisions and actions. This paper will serve as a building block to your final paper.
This paper should be 5–7 pages (excluding the title page, and references) and contain a list of at least 12 scholarly sources as well as all of the the Reading & Study materials and Scripture. The paper must be formatted in Turabian.
Sources:
To be more specific on this note, remember that the required reading and presenations are designed to help you better understand statesmanship and its key offshoot—statecraft. Thus, it is vitally important that you use the following:
Readings:
• Fischer: “Leadership and Statesmanship”
• Holloway, “Christianity, Magnanimity, and Statesmanship”
• Newell
• Stein: “Isaiah and Statesmanship”
• Vaughan
Videos and Presetnations:
• Biblical Principles of Government
• America’s Constitutional Tradition
• Christianity and Rationalism
• The Constitutional Convention
• Covenants and Statesmanship
• Goeglein: “Uncompromising Statesmanship”/ “Rhetorical Challenges”
Additional Research: 12-15 scholarly (i.e. “peer-reviewed”) sources. Liberty’s online library has the ability to specifically select the “peer-reviewed” option.
Paper Structure:
The following sections must be addressed, with proper headings, in the following order:
• Definition of Statesmanship
• Attributes of Statesmanship
• Application
• Comparison to Pseudo-Statesmanship
• Summary
Remember that a discussion of Biblical principles of government and statecraft must be included as relevant. The grading rubric provides more specifics for the paper and each required section.
Below is the link for the video covenants and statesmanship https://learn.liberty.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_370203_1&content_id=_18032671_1
Below is the link for the other videos • Covenants and Statesmanship • Goeglein: “Uncompromising Statesmanship”/ “Rhetorical Challenges” https://learn.liberty.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_370203_1&content_id=_18032681_1
Link to the following videos • Biblical Principles of Government • America’s Constitutional Tradition • Christianity and Rationalism • The Constitutional Convention https://learn.liberty.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_370203_1&content_id=_18032676_1
Currently 0 writers are viewing this order

BOOK REVIEWS INSTRUCTIONS
You will write a 5–7-page critique (not including the title page and bibliography) on each of the following books:
• The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (Book Review 1)
Each Book Review must include the following sections:
• Introduction
• Summary
• Critique
• Personal Response
• Conclusion
You must remember to use 5–6 quotes from the book to support your claims and show at least 7 connections to a geopolitical framework. The Book Reviews must be typed in 12-point Times New Roman font, be double spaced with 1-inch margins, and follow current Turabian format. See the grading rubric for specific guidelines and grading procedures.