Category: Uncategorized

Conduct some online research to present your understanding of the sub-discipline we refer to as Positive Psychology. Comment on whether or not you have heard of this subfield of psychology. What are your thoughts about it? Also include comments as to your thoughts on the power of positive attitudes in relation to health.

Write a no more than 1500 word (not including reference list) article on your topic using your references for information. The article must summarise and describe your topic for a general audience (e.g. like an article in New Scientist) and use of case examples will lift this. Make sure you think about the structure and flow (I will mark this as well as scientific content) – the article will need:  an engaging title,  a good introduction with a succinct description of the background to the topic (e.g. pollutants, hazards, problems etc),  informative body of text to discuss the issue with good illustration using relevant case studies,  and a where to from here conclusion.

-it is an Art course assignment, which requires making a journal if art/painting is objective or subjective. -you have to select art OR painting (to be objective or subjective) to talk about in the journal not both. -i attached guidelines papers from my Dr . -if we both agreed; i will give you more required information about my assignment. -It is high-quality university assignment.LOOKING FOR A+.

Explain the ESA Model in its various styles and express your opinion on how such a model may help in the execution of good lessons. You may also wish to relate to the importance of planning lessons as a first step. Base you answer on chapters you read in our course book: 1. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. England: Pearson Education Ltd. Longman.

Shashi, a consumer, ordered some summer clothing from a website, in the hope that he might go on holiday to a country with sunshine. He ordered a hat, some summer shoes, T shirts, shorts and sun glasses. He filled in the order form and the total cost came to £150. After he pressed the “buy now” button, the order was displayed with an additional £25 postage and insured delivery charge added on. However, he wanted the items and so he carried on with the order. A few days after the goods arrived Shashi’s holiday fell through, so he decided to return the items. He searched the seller’s website looking for their returns process. All he could find was an email address, so he sent them an email about returning the goods. The seller told Shashi that he is only entitled to have a full refund if the goods are faulty or mis-described, and then he must return the goods within seven days of receiving them. However, because there is nothing wrong with the goods the seller has offered to take the goods back, but knock off 30% of the price by way of a re-stocking fee, and the money for the outgoing postage and insurance. Advise Shashi of his rights under the Consumer Rights Directive and the domestic law implementing the Directive.

The instructions for this paper are lengthy and extremely detailed. I have included the instructions in links provided below. The first phase of this research paper will be DUE IN 24 HOURS. However, the remainder of the paper won’t be due until 7 days. After the submission of the first portion, the instructor will leave comments which should be taken into account for the revision. Please reach out to me with any questions. It is imperative that ALL the instructions, especially formatting, are followed for this assignment. Thank you so much!
LOGIN INFO REQUIRED TO ACCESS LINKS (PROVIDED)
FIRST DRAFT: TITLE PAGE, INTRO, & REFERENCES INSTRUCTIONS – THIS IS DUE IN FIRST 24 HOURS (5 PAGES)
https://coastdistrict.instructure.com/courses/16924/pages/first-draft-title-page-intro-and-references-instructions
REVISION 1 INSTRUCTIONS
https://coastdistrict.instructure.com/courses/16924/pages/revision-1-instructions?module_item_id=755687
HOW TO USE SCHOOL VIRTUAL LIBRARY FOR FINDING PEER APPROVED ARTICLES TO USE AS REFERENCES – Please use this method for at least a few of the references
https://coastdistrict.instructure.com/courses/16924/pages/m03-how-to-use-the-coastline-virtual-library?module_item_id=755611

1. Introduction
• Introduce topic and explain, why you choose this topic?
• Why this topic matters?
• What changes would you expect as a result of inclusion significant others?
• PICO Question? Needs to be intelligible (all 150 words)
Here is the PICO question
P= Adult with hearing loss (presbycusis) who fitted with hearing aids
I= involving significant others
C= not involving significant others
O= change of perception in the level of awareness of the significant other and the level of support the patient receives
Here is the question that we need to answer using the selected articles (we must critique all the articles please base on the question???
‘Adult with hearing loss (Presbycusis) who fitted with hearing aids, involving significant others, not involving significant others, change of perception in the level of awareness of the significant other and the level of support the patient receives?’
2. Search strategy (200 words) I have done this so don’t worry please edit it only??
• • Here we need to explain the search strategy? Must be replicated
• • And we must use only experimental studies
• • Plan of the search strategy
• • Which data base have been used
• • What search terms
• • How many article found initially and how many eliminated or used and why?
3. Selection
Why this articles selected? (100 words)
4. . Critical analysis (critique the selected articles) (1250 words)
• We have to critically appraisal the selected articles
• This part is very important
Critical thinking:
• We really need to understand what we are critiquing?
• What does the qualitative study tell us and the experimental and the observation?
• Please I will be assed on: organisations and structure, scope of review, depth of review and logic and coherence we must comment on the strength of the articles (please this section is really important)
5. Take home message (what I have learned?) (250 words)
6. Conclusion (quality of research) (100 words)
We need to say whether these articles answered our question or not?

Important note for the writer: This is a project which is in continuation with the last assignment of the same subject. I am sending you all the details of my assignment which I have submitted along with all the necessary documents that needs to be followed in this assignment. It is a bit tricky project so please ensure that you give more focus on its quality.
I am doing a project for an organisation named Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital in India. And I am designing a Patient feedback survey and providing an Implementation plan to the organisation.( Please note that I am not going to conduct a survey just design a survey questionnaire)and provide a good implementation plan.
Please provide my assignment on time.
I am attaching files to it . Feel free to contact me or email me at any time.
Attachments named ‘assignment2(2) is my project proposal which I have sumbitted and according to that please make an interim project report. I am adding two examples of how to make an interim report to match the standards of the assignment.
Details:
Introduction
This assignment contributes 20% of your final mark for ALS.
In project management, continued progress (and funding) is often dependent upon periodic reports such as an interim report.
The report should be prepared in the style of a project report from your project organization, but nevertheless be written as an academic paper to meet the University requirements for this subject. This means there needs to be appropriate degree of citation and academic referencing.
Consider the audience and purpose of an interim project report. It should detail the progress of your project. Interim results are useful to support of the project continuation by your sponsoring organisation. Brevity and clarity of expression are essential requirements.
Structure
The structure of the report ‘tells the story’ of your project to date, and enables the reader to see that you have met the requirements of the project brief. (If variations have arisen in the course of the work unfolding we need to be able to see what variations occurred, why they occurred, and how they were dealt with).
There may be deliverables other than the project report – e.g. you may have produced a plan, questionnaire or a policy or a budget, and these may be either a part of your project report, or included as an appendix.
One important way in which this report may differ from others you have produced for work is that we require a review of what the relevant literature contributes to your project, both in the background sections and in the discussion. Depending on the project, this may be structured as a separate section, or it may be integrated into your analysis. We are looking for evidence that you have reviewed the peer-reviewed literature for academic evidence, that you have read what others have said, and that you have applied it (where feasible) to your approach. The ‘grey literature’ (e.g. major policy documents or reviews) may be as important as academic research sources; most projects need to use evidence from both sources. The academic literature will be even more important when you turn to the your final draft article assignment, so you need to be sure you are well-versed in it from now onwards. It is also worth noting that organisations are now seeking to use evidence for policy and management practice more so than in the past, so this will add value to the report to the sponsoring organisation.
This report needs to make sense to people who are not familiar with your work as well as those who know it well; and that more than one of the academic staff for this subject will be reading your report, and only one will be familiar with your topic area. Your organization may require specific headings in your report, in which case please use those, otherwise you may find it useful to use these components or headings in your report.
A title page identifying LTU and the organisation on whose behalf you conducted the project
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Introduction
Background and literature review
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion and Recommendations
References
Project management documentation (you may choose to have these as appendices)
Gantt Chart with variations documented
Budget and Expenditure Report
Stakeholder Management Report
Risk Assessment Report
Other
The report should advise the audience (i.e. your funders)
Is your project on time and on budget?
If not,
can the project timeline and budget be regained?
If so, what strategies will you recommend to ensure the project can regain its timelines and or budget?
If the project timeline and budget cannot be regained
What additional resources can you seek?
Can time-lines be altered? Are there any interim results, and do they support the continuation of the project? (Beware, the temptation will be to discuss this at length and at the expense of other important management needs).
The word count on this report is intentionally brief – you are encouraged to consider ways in which interim data can be represented concisely. An overview of results, using summary tables and diagrams supported by a minimum of exposition but yet sufficient to ensure clarity to a reader unfamiliar with your project should be included if you indeed have any results at this time (some may not).
Finally, we recommend that you initiate the document that will become the project report as early as possible in the project – finalising it will be easier if you’ve added relevant material as you go (starting with key parts of the project proposal). Base your report on the excellent work already achieved in your project proposal and ethics applications – in many respects this report is a continuation of those works.
Marking criteria for Assessment 4: Interim Project Report
1.
The report includes an Abstract / Executive Summary which succinctly summarises the project to date, with a focus on the progress of your process.
5%
2.
An Introduction explains the organisational and operational context of the project so that the reader can understand how the project fits into the organisation, as well as any major constraints. The rationale for the project is presented in a clear and substantive manner.
5%
3.
A Background or Literature Review identifies the current relevant peer-reviewed literature.
5%
4.
The Methods section describes your project design, data collection strategy, and data analysis design. The methods are sound, justified, and have been implemented appropriately.
Ethical aspects of the project design and data collection are included. The HEC approval number is provided where relevant. All variations from the Ethics Application and Approval are identified, are reasonable, and have been submitted as recommendations for consideration and approval by the sponsoring organisation and HEC.
10%
5.
Provisional outcomes (preliminary/interim results) are summarised and, where appropriate, illustrated. Data presented in graphs is discussed within the narrative.
10%
6.
Interim Deliverables (linked to the proposal objectives) are reported.
10%
7.
An appropriate Discussion is included, which discusses both any interim reports (where relevant) and the management of the project to date.
Supporting documentation is provided for the project management discussion (as appendices):
Gantt Chart showing progress to date and any variances
Expenditure to date and budget variance
Stakeholder management plan and variances
Risk Assessment Plan, variances, and mitigation
It is likely that since the project plan was devised additional steps may have become apparent. These should be documented in your report, and described in a short commentary. Any outstanding tasks and challenges are presented (and say if there are none). If there are variations or delays there is a brief description of the proposed mitigation strategy.
30%
8.
Conclusion with recommendations
10%
9
The report is appropriately and consistently referenced (please use referencing style preferred by your organisation, if there is no preferred style then please use Harvard or APA).
10%
10
The Report should
include an title page,
have a table of contents,
observe the word count (and note the word count on the title page)
be well structured,
be clearly written
be grammatically correct
use a 12-point serif font
have body text spacing of at least 1.5.
have name and student number included in either the Header or the Footer.
a set of acknowledgements (where appropriate).
Attachments (other than the project management documentation listed above) such as draft surveys or interview schedules are not included in the word count and may be read at the discretion of the assessor.
5%
Issues
Please be mindful of the recommended word count – 4500 words +/-10%.
References do not count towards the word count. Appendices are included.
If assignments do not meet the standards of academic integrity, penalties will be applied.
Please note that by submitting on-line you also are stating that this project is all your own work and all appropriate sources have been appropriately referenced.
Please refer to the course materials and La Trobe University Academic Integrity website to ensure you understand this important matter.

Evidence Based Practice Proposal – Section B: Problem Description
Details:
Write a paper of 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page) on your proposed problem description for your EBP project. The paper should address the following:

• Describe the background of the problem. Tell the story of the issue and why it deserves attention.
• Identify the stakeholders/change agents. Who, or what organizations, are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. List the interested parties, patients, students, agencies, Joint Commission, etc.
• Use the feedback from the Topic 2 main forum post and refine your PICOT question. Make sure that the question fits with your graduate degree specialization.
• State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. The objective should address what is to be gained. This is a restatement of the question, providing focus. Measurements need to be taken before and after the evidence-based practice is introduced to identify the expected changes.
• 5) Provide supportive rationale that the problem or issue is an important one for nursing to resolve using relevant professional literature sources.
• Develop an initial reference list to assure that there is adequate literature to support your evidence-based practice project. Follow the “Steps to an Efficient Search to Answer a Clinical Question” box in chapter 3 of the textbook. Use “NUR-699 Search Method Example” to assist you.
• 7) The majority of references should be research articles. However, national sources such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Department of Health and Human Resources (HHS), or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and others may be used when you are gathering statistics to provide the rationale for the problem.
• Once you get into the literature, you may find there is very little research to support your topic and you will have to start all over again. Remember, in order for this to be an evidence-based project, you must have enough evidence to introduce this as a practice change. If you find that you do not have enough supporting evidence to change a practice, then further research would need to be conducted.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section B: Problem Description” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
NUR699.R.SearchMethod_student.docx
 
Apply Rubrics
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section B: Problem Description

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00%	3 Satisfactory 88.00%	4 Good 92.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
100.0 % Problem Description
100.0 % Describe the background of the problem. Identify the stakeholders/change agents and list the interested parties. Provide the PICOT question. State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. Develop an initial reference list.	There is no discernible problem description and/or objectives. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or is minimally addressed. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are not addressed or are minimally addressed. Inaccurate comprehension of material and lack the ability to apply information is revealed. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Initial reference list is missing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	The problem description and objectives are addressed, but not all components are included. Alignment is difficult to discern. The problem is not in the correct format. Objectives are lacking measurement or may be ambiguous. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or is minimally introduced with no supporting details. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are listed. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. A partial initial reference list is developed. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	The problem description and objectives are stated but may not be fully developed or aligned. The problem is in the PICOT format but not appropriately developed. Objectives are measurable but may be ambiguous. The problem selection rationale is present but the significance is unclear. Expected changes are briefly introduced. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	The problem description and objectives are presented and tie together. The stakeholders/change agents – who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal – are identified. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable. The problem selection is justified using literature. Expected changes are outlined. An initial reference list is developed. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	The problem description and objectives are presented in detail and align. The stakeholders/change agents – who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal – are described. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable. The problem selection is justified using literature and supportive examples, not just based on the most current evidence. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are integrated. An initial reference list is developed. Clarity and specificity of comprehension are demonstrated, and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

 

DISCUSS ROLE PLAYING AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF STRATEGIES YOU WILL USE TO EVALUATE LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE NURSING FUNDAMENTALS COURSE:
• PORTFOLIO
• PAPERS AND ESSAYS
• ORAL QUESTIONING
• AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDING
• SERVICE LEARNING
1. DESCRIBE ONE ADVANTAGE FOR USING ROLE PLAYING AND THE OTHER STRATEGY YOU PICKED ABOVE
2. DESCRIBE ONE DISADVANTAGE FOR USING ROLE PLAYING AND THE OTHER STRATEGY YOU PICKED ABOVE
3. TWO ADVANTAGES OF USING TRUE AND FALSE TEST ITEMS
4. DESCRIBE KEY CONSIDERATIONS INVOLVED WITH DEVELOPING RESPONSE OPTIONS
5. DESCRIBE HOW A STUDENT’S CULTURAL AND PERSONAL BACKGROUND COULD IMPACT LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM.
6. EXPLAIN HOW POST TEST ANALYSIS IS BEST PRACTICE FOR PROVIDING FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS IN THE CLINICAL SETTING