e occurrence of the offense in the selected areas

Choose metropolitan areas with different data.
 
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper comparing the occurrence of the offense in the selected areas. Identify the number of occurrences reported to the police for each area, and address the following questions:
 

  • Which area had more reported incidents?
  • What were the rates of the crime for each area?
  • Did the rates change over time in either area?
  • What factors might explain the differences in the rates?

 
*****Response must be consistent with New APA guidelines complete with detailed intro and conclusion, subtitles for each section, in-text citations, as well as reference page.

economies of scale

discussion:
Evaluate the merits of U.S. production sharing with Mexico and other countries, and justify your response. 200 word
 
Question 1

  1. Mongolia and Malaysia have very different trading patterns. Mongolia trades mainly with China, while Malaysia trades about equally with China and with other Asian countries. Malaysia does more trade relative to its GDP. Explain these differences using the gravity model.
    Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

Question 2

  1. What are the two sources of economies of scale? How do these economies of scale lead to intraindustry trade?
    Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

Question 3

  1. Perfect labor mobility would tend to equalize real wage rates in participating countries. In reality, complete wage equalization does not occur. Why? In addition, if stringent restrictions are imposed on migration, what will happen to capital in high wage countries?
    Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

Question 4

  1. Which of the following are foreign direct investments (FDI), and which are not? Explain your answer to each.

    1. A German businessman buys $10 million of Toshiba stock on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.
    2. A French businessman buys an apartment building in Rome, Italy.
    3. A German company merges with a British company; stockholders in the British company exchange their stock for shares in the German firm.
    4. A Korean firm builds a plant in Brazil and manages the plant as a contractor to the Brazilian government.

    Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

 

Economics

4 short but fascinating videos on President Andrew Jackson, as well as various U.S. founding fathers,  on fearing the actions and corruptions of big bankers!!!  Sound familiar to today!!
1 President Andrew Jackson and Big Banks–sounds like today!!!) –(from History Channel)-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Knf8KA5aAjw&feature=related
 
2 (Also Thomas Jefferson)  — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cnItVN1Gk0 and
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7yjfI19b7s
 
4 ( from HBO film mini series on President John Adams– (Watch at the dinner table–George Washington, Thomas Jefferson- who had just returned from Paris, Alexander Hamilton, our first Secretary of the Treasury, and John Adams http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrxKOO0nKwc
 
Regarding the videos for the discussion, I wish to ask how do the conversations of the founding fathers and Jackson relate to today? What did you like the most?

law and ethics

The purpose of this assignment is to differentiate between law and ethics, understand how both affect today’s business environment, and identify the importance of alternative dispute resolution in business. 

Assignment Steps 

Develop a 1,050-word summary contrasting law and ethics describing the following: 

  • Describe how laws or regulations affect your past or current job or industry.
  • Describe how ethical rules affect your past or current job or industry and explain why ethics are considered an asset to a workplace.
  • Discuss the various types of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and analyze which types of ADRs are regularly used in your workplace.

Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed references.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. 
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

sales and marketing

View this problem scenario A to learn more about Bill and Joe’s relationship. This scenario provides key information in helping formulate answers for assignments in Phases 1 and 2.
You are having a lunch meeting with Bill Bateman, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the Peninsula Hotel chain, and Joe Smith, the sales rep for UWEAR. During the meeting, Bill raises the topic of the upcoming contract renewal.
“I’m glad you brought that up, Bill,” Joe says. “We’re really looking forward to working with you again this year. I was happy that we were able to reach an agreement last year, and it’s been a pleasure working with you and your team.”
Joe, like most of the UWEAR and PALEDENIM employees, is feeling the pressure to perform, fearing cutbacks and layoffs because of the merger. Sales have been down, and profit margins are very slim. Last year, Joe was reprimanded when he signed the contract with Peninsula Hotels because the price that he offered was so low. However, he had no choice because his competitor, Threads4U, was also a very shrewd bidder, and Joe would have lost the contract otherwise.
“Well, it has been good working with you too, Joe. I’ve really enjoyed our friendship, and the contract was very beneficial for our company,” Bill continues, “The reason I wanted to talk about the contract today is because I just got a call this week from Samantha over at Threads4U. She’s offering to beat your price by 10% to win back our business. What are you going to do to counter that offer?”
Answer the following:
What should Joe do in this situation?
What ethical theory supports how you think Joe should react to this situation?
Why would you use this theory?
What might others with a different view than yours say in this situation?
How would you refute those opposing perspectives?
Is there a compromise or creative solution to this problem? If so, what is it? Why is it feasible?
Part II
View problem scenario A https://class.coloradotech.edu/CbFileShareCommon/ctu/INTD670/Assignment_Assets/ProblemA.pdf
to learn more about Bill and Joe’s relationship. This scenario provides key information in helping formulate answers for assignments in Phases 1 and 2.
The meeting between Bill and Joe did not go very well, and the Peninsula Hotel chain contract is in jeopardy. Despite their personal relationship, Bill is threatening to sign a contract with Joe’s competitor, Threads4U, because it is undercutting UWEAR’s price.
Joe is desperate to save the contract because the Peninsula Hotel chain contract accounts for over 50% of his territory’s sales—without them, his future with UWEAR is uncertain. He realizes that he needs to gain approval from his management team before he moves forward with any further contract negotiations with the Peninsula Hotel chain. Complete the following…
Who are the stakeholders in this situation?
What are the responsibilities of each stakeholder to the company?
Provide at least 4 ethical responsibilities for each stakeholder.
For each stakeholder, what would be the appropriate response to the situation?
What should Joe propose to the management team?
How should he support his proposal?

Business ethic

Business ethic
Reading:
Archer, D. (2008). Ensuring an ethical organization. CMA Management, 82(7), 32-36. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
t=true&db=bth&AN=35687469&site=ehost-live&scope=site
 
Mojtahedi, M. H., & Lan Oo, B. (2014). Stakeholders’ approaches to disaster risk reduction in built
environment. Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(4), 356-369. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libraryresources.c
olumbiasouthern.edu/docview/1658531769?accountid
Simola, S. (2014). Teaching corporate crisis management through business ethics education. European
Journal of Training and Development, 38(5), 483-503. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libraryresources.c
olumbiasouthern.edu/docview/1650544486?accountid=33337
Unit Reflection Paper
Select a significant tragic event (either domestic or global) that has occurred during the last 50 years. The interactive PowerPoint in this unit provides some ideas of historical tragic events but understand that these are just ideas. After describing the event and the post-tragedy events, discuss the ethical aspects revolving around this incident. This may require some additional research to understand the ethical situations and the impact these had on affected people being able to move on with their lives.
1. Describe the actions of people and organizational leaders directly and indirectly involved with the tragedy. Specifically, address the ethical issues they faced.
2. What were some of the actions of local, state and federal personnel with respect to dealing with this tragedy?
3. Explain the strategies of organizations that attempted to assist with the clean-up after the tragic event. Describe several of the pressures that influenced their strategies. Distinguish between social responsibility, integrity and simple business ethics.
4. How has this event affected the ethical culture here in the United States? What other affect has it had on society as a whole?
Your response should be a minimum of two double-spaced pages. References should include, at minimum, one additional credible reference beyond the required reading.

 Information systems

Research Paper
Select a ONE topic from the following list on which you would like to conduct an in-depth investigation:

  1.  Information systems infrastructure: evolution and trends
  2.  Strategic importance of cloud computing in business organizations
  3.  Big data and its business impacts
  4.  Managerial issues of a networked organization
  5.  Emerging enterprise network applications
  6.  Mobile computing and its business implications  

Note:  You may use up to three resources found by yourself or your peers as resources for the paper.
Research paper basics:

  • 8-10 pages in length
  • APA formatted
  • Minimum six (6) sources – at least two (2) from peer reviewed journals
  • Include an abstract, introduction, and conclusion
  • See rubric for more detailed grading criteria

 
Some good questions to ask yourself before turning in your research paper:

  • Is the paper of optimal length?
  • Is the paper well organized?
  • Is the paper clear and concise?
  • Is the title appropriate?
  • Does the abstract summarize well?
  • Are individual ideas assimilated well?
  • Are wording, punctuation, etc. correct?
  • Is the paper well motivated?
  • Is interesting problem/issue addressed?
  • Is knowledge of the area demonstrated?
  • Have all key reference been cited?
  • Are conclusions valid and appropriate?
  • Are your references formatted according to the APA format?

Deadline Date: 08/22/2017 on Tuesday 12:00 P.M
 
No plagiarism and no copy paste 

 Law Enforcement Technology

must follow lesson plan and answer question, no plagirasim,
Glassberg, J. (2015). The ransomware threat. Law Enforcement Technology42(9), 33-35.
 
 
Then, write a case study that answers the following questions:
 
 What was the problem? What were the effects of the problem?
 
 What is the profile of the hacker?
 
 What can be done to protect against the threat?
 
 What should be done if a computer is infected with ransomware?
 
 What type(s) of cybercrime was/were involved in this article? Does the identified offender fit the characteristics for this type of cybercrime?
 
Your assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages, and you should use APA formatting. In addition, any references used should be properly cited.