Posted on

ЕNVIRОNMЕNTАL TАХ : А САSЕ ОF USА АND СHINА

Criterion 1 :
Research and discuss aspects of implementation or evaluation showing an awareness of the key conceptual difficulties, theoretical perspectives and debates in the literature, and relate theoretical perspectives and debates about governance to real world examples.
Criterion 2 :
Demonstrate an awareness of, and critically reflect upon, the complex and dynamic relationships between political actors and institutions at the local, national and/or international levels of governance in terms of implementation or evaluation.
Criterion 3 :
Demonstrate an academic critical capacity and development of balanced argument and evaluation .
Criterion 4 :
Apply referencing and style conventions as appropriate; in fluent English at the standard required for postgraduate study .
Task Length :
4,000 words [not including references, footnotes, captions] .
Feedback of order/ 512365
1) Demonstrate an understanding of the task by: Preparing a paper outlining your proposed research essay:
Has addressed the purpose of the task clearly with good focus.
2) Demonstrate that you can research, understand & explain implementation & evaluation policy by: Recognising and critically reflecting upon conceptual difficulties, theoretical perspectives & debates with reference to real world examples:
Good clear, well-designed plan
that identifies and
explains your likely
approach, with a good choice
of topic, theory, case study(ies) & good references.
3) Demonstrate academic capacity, balanced argument and evaluation; Constructing a plan that describes how you will be going about your research including developing your argument:
Provided a good description of how you will be developing and balancing your argument and going about your research, and a good indication of likely references, research sources.
4) Communicate effectively in writing by: Adhering to English conventions (expression, fluency, vocabulary, grammar, punctuation, paragraphs, syntax, spelling):
Adequate English conventions (expression, fluency, vocabulary, grammar, punctuation, paragraphs, syntax, spelling).
more feedback
This is a well thought-out and researched study plan for your research ahead. You have a a clear outline, good case studies and good quality references to start you off. You will need to be careful with your editing to ensure a flow of expression.
This is a great topic choice and we look forward to seeing this develop and unfold.
Feedback of order/ 510996
1) Addressing the set task:
Has in the main addressed the purpose of the task clearly with focus.
2) Defining concepts in the theory and literature:
Some concepts are defined; supported by scholarly literature; but relevance unclear.
3) Identifying strengths and weaknesses of different theories as they apply to practice [examples]:
Broadly identifies some strengths and/or weaknesses of theories/ models as they apply generally to policy practice/ examples.
4) Constructing a defensible position based upon evidence:
Adequately makes an argument based upon limited evidence/ research.
5) Demonstrating an academic critical capacity and capacity for evaluation:
Basic arguments in the literature relevant to your essay are identified.
6) Drawing conclusions and learnings from your discussion of the difficulties of policy implementation and evaluation:
Drew sound conclusions and some learnings from discussion of implementation and evaluation.
7) Using appropriate expression:
Some introduction to the topic evident; adequate writing style, and grammar and spelling mostly accurate; adequately structured/ formatted with paragraphing evident.
8) Adhering to English conventions (expression, fluency, vocabulary, grammar, punctuation, paragraphs, syntax, spelling):
Inadequate English conventions (expression, fluency, vocabulary, grammar, punctuation, paragraphs, syntax, spelling).
9) Attributing the work of others correctly:
No plagiarism; 10 or more references to support ideas; clear evidence of scholarly reading and research beyond unit materials.
10) Applying the Harvard (or substitute) referencing:
Harvard (or substitute) referencing is consistently accurate.
more feedback
This essay is sound and has addressed the main purpose of the task.
The expression was disjointed and unclear, however the improvement towards the end of the paper was significant. The structure and choice of headings was good. I think the expression could be improved and made clearer for your future work.

Posted on

To compare the departure security systems between Australian airports and other countries and how this can be improved (passenger from counter to the gate different between domestic and international flight, compare to the other city how to make it better)

To compare the departure security systems between Australian airports and other countries and how this can be improved (passenger from counter to the gate different between domestic and international flight, compare to the other city how to make it better).
 
This is a team project, you just need to do the part of Methods/procedures, Literature review & references.
the references can you please choose the website to use because I need to show and open it to my teammate and lecture, if you choose the book I can’t show it to my team, thanks, you should have a look our research plan, is base on it to write this assignment. thanks a lot
 

  1. Introduction
  2. Methods/procedures
  3. Literature review
  4. Discussion
  5. Conclusions
  6. Recommendations
  7. References
  8. Appendices

 
 
 
How to write?
 

  1. Describing methods or procedures
  • Shows the rigor of your research
  • Validity & reliability issues
  • be clear and direct, concise and straight to the
  • point do not to stray off into irrelevance
  • should be written in chronological order
  • used the past tense
  • should be written in an objective style
  • the focus should be on the action, not the person doing the action
  • use the passive voice
  1. What is a literature review?
  • Literature
    • journal articles, research reports, government reports, textbooks and other scholarly publications
  • Review
    • the selection, presentation, interpretation, classification & evaluation of what others have written on a topic
  1. Why do a literature review?
  • Demonstrate knowledge
  • Justify the need for your research project
  • Provide background
  • Link your topic to the field
  1. Body paragraphs of literature review
  • Can be organized:
    • Historically or chronologically
    • In order of significance
    • According to research questions
    • Thematically
  1. Discussion
  • The ‘so what?’ section of your project report
  • Your interpretation, evaluation, judgement, assessment of the findings as they relate to the research question/focus
  1. Conclusions
  • Clear & concise summary
  • Refer back to aim/purpose of the paper or project
  • State the significance/ relevance/implications of your findings
  1. Recommendations
  • Emerge from conclusions
  • Brief, persuasive statements
Posted on

KNОWLЕDGЕ МАNАGЕMЕNT STRАTЕGY STАGЕ 2

Assessment Task 2: KM Strategy (50%)
Aims
The aim of Assessment Task 2 is to enable you to demonstrate that you have a broad
understanding of the theory and practice of knowledge management (KM). This
assessment task will provide you with an opportunity to take the theoretical concepts
covered during the course and consider how these might be applied in an
organisational setting. Specifically, Assessment Task 2 requires you to develop a KM
strategy for an organisation. In order to increase your motivation and interest in
completing this assessment task, you are encouraged to select an organisation and
industry of interest to you.
The course learning outcomes (CLO) addressed in this assessment task are:
 CLO1: Analyse and explain the developments in the ‘new economy’ and in
particular the place and nature of knowledge in such developments
 CLO2: Demonstrate a broad, critical and practical understanding of KM theories
and practices in the real world.
 CLO3: Investigate the linkages between management and KM and in particular of
those between KM and strategic and human resources management
 CLO4: Examine the various human, organisational and technological components
that together combine to produce KM
 CLO5: Explore the role and place of information and communications
technologies in the practice of KM
 CLO6: Develop a KM strategy for an organisation
General guidelines
It is envisaged that this assessment task will result in the development of a
professional KM strategy. The strategy should draw upon the material studied in each
of the ten topics covered during the semester – of course depending on the
organisation selected, the emphasis on each topic is likely to vary.
You should ensure that you are able to acquire a sufficient understanding of your
chosen organisation in order to enable a meaningful KM strategy to be developed.
Such understanding might be sought from secondary sources such as case studies in
textbooks, or information provided by corporate websites. With the permission of
appropriate personnel at the selected organisation, you may also elect to conduct
interviews or surveys with key employees – a process which one would expect to
occur in developing such a strategy in a commercial situation.
The assessment task will be submitted in two (2) stages:
 KM Strategy (Stage 1) (20%)
 KM Strategy (Stage 2) (30%)
KM Strategy (Stage 1) (20%)
The purpose of the Stage 1 submission is to ensure that you obtain useful feedback to
improve your KM strategy prior to submission of the final version in Stage 2. Your
Stage 1 submission should include:
INTE2397 Knowledge Management 2017-2
Created By: Associate Professor Vanessa Cooper Page 3 of 7
An introduction and background to the organisation, including organisational
objectives, structure and other relevant contextual information
 An overview of the approach and methods used in developing the KM strategy
 A strategic and knowledge gap analysis for the organisation that focuses on
concepts covered within the first six topics studied in the course
 A set of recommendations that might be made to the organisation to close the
identified strategic and knowledge gaps
 References
 Appendices
As the word limit for the final KM strategy submitted in Stage 2 is a maximum of
three thousand (3000) words (excluding references but including any appendices)
your submission for Stage 1 should be less than this.
Upon receipt of feedback for Stage 1 of the assessment task, you are welcome to
make an appointment with your lecturer in order to discuss any difficulties with the
assessment task that you might have.
Stage 2: KM Strategy (30%)
The KM strategy submitted for Stage 2 should comprise a revised version of the
Stage 1 submission, which has been further developed based on the feedback received
from your lecturer. The final KM strategy submission should also include a more
comprehensive analysis and set of recommendations that integrate relevant concepts
from the remaining four topics covered in the course.
As noted above, the final KM strategy should be a maximum of three thousand
(3000) words (excluding references but including any figures, tables and appendices).
Learning to communicate comprehensive information in a concise manner is an
important skill and therefore penalties will be applied for exceeding this word limit.
Such penalties might include either a reduction in the marks awarded, or alternatively,
that only the first 3000 words will be marked.
Suggested Structure for the KM Strategy (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
The following is designed to provide general guidance as to the structure of the KM
strategy. However, this is a suggestion only and by no means should limit your
creativity when constructing your own KM strategy:
 Introduction and Background to the Organisation
 Overview of Approach and Methods used in Developing the KM Strategy
 Analysis: Strategic Gap Analysis/Knowledge Gap Analysis
o Desired State: Where the Organisation Wants to Be
 Operational Infrastructure
 Technological Infrastructure
 Cultural Infrastructure
o Current State: Where the Organisation is Now
 Operational Infrastructure
 Technological Infrastructure
 Cultural Infrastructure
INTE2397 Knowledge Management 2017-2
Created By: Associate Professor Vanessa Cooper Page 4 of 7
o Summary of Strategic/Knowledge Gaps
 KM Recommendations/Roadmap
 Operational Infrastructure
 Technological Infrastructure
 Cultural Infrastructure
 Closing Statement
 References
 Appendices
M

Posted on

ЕQUАL ОРРОRTUNITY, DUTY ОF САRЕ & ЕTHIСАL СОNSIDЕRАTIОNS IN THЕ LАBОRАTОRY

Equal Opportunity, Duty of Care & Ethical Considerations
Complete the following assessment tasks/portfolio entries for this element/competency:
Discuss what is meant by equal opportunity and state the Australian legislations that ensure equal opportunity and prevent discrimination in workplaces.
Discuss what is meant by duty of care and ethics in the laboratory. Include in this the organisational, local and national policy or legislation which govern these.
Competency/Element Standard 2.2: Equal Opportunity, Duty of Care, Ethical consideration
Discuss what is meant by equal opportunity and state the Australian legislations that ensure equal opportunity and prevent discrimination in workplaces.
Discuss what is meant by duty of care and ethics in the laboratory. Include in this the organisational, local and national policy or legislation which govern these.
Discussion points/thoughts for this Element/Competency (Tasks/Activities 1 & 2)
1. What is meant by “Equal Opportunities”?
2. What are “Protected Characteristics”? List them.
3. What is the meaning of each type of discrimination? Direct, Indirect, Harassment, Victimisation.
4. Discrimination can occur when another person discriminates against you or a colleague, or if you discriminate against another person. What are some examples of discrimination in the workplace?
5. What can you do if workplace discrimination occurs?
6. You should have (and list) an understanding of the basic principles of anti-discrimination laws in Australia.
7. You should know the role of the Australian Human Rights Commission in the area of anti-discrimination.
8. What is meant by “Duty of Care”? Define and give examples.
9. You need to be aware of and list the state and national legislations relating to Duty of Care.
10. What might be some of the consequences of not providing a reasonable duty of care to patients, clients, etc (i.e. negligence)?
11. You should have an appreciation that Australian State laws can vary from the Federal law.
Research…
It is important to use only trusted sources of information, and to remember that laws can change over time.
The most reliable and up to date source of information on Australian Anti-discrimination law is the Australian Government Website. The Australian Human Rights Commission oversees acts of discrimination. This Australian Government page and its various links will provide more information…http://www.ag.gov.au/RightsAndProtections/HumanRights/Pages/default.aspx
For information relating to Duty of Care towards patients/clients you may consult the Department of Health website http://www.health.gov.au/ that has some important information relating to Duty of care.
All references must follow Vancouver Guidelines.
Answers must be written on the Proforma provided.

Posted on

RЕSЕАRСH ЕSSАY (IMРRОVING РUBLIС SЕСTОR ЕFFIСIЕNСY : СHАLLЕNGЕS АND ОРРОRTUNITIЕS.

Criterion 1
Research and discuss aspects of governance showing an awareness of the key conceptual difficulties, theoretical perspectives and debates in the field of governance and relate theoretical perspectives and debates about governance to real world examples.
Criterion 2
Demonstrate an awareness of and critically reflect upon the complex and dynamic relationships between political actors and institutions at the local, national and/or international levels of governance.
Criterion 3
Demonstrate an academic critical capacity and development of balanced argument and evaluation.
Criterion 4
Apply referencing and style conventions as appropriate.

Posted on

SYSTЕMАTIС RЕVIWЕ Т2DМ

 
 
Result section(2000words):
-My project basically is systematic review ( systematic review of economic burden of diabetes type 2 worldwide) So  Could you please make a result section for all of 15 studies that I will attach by taking all direct cost and adjust it to US $ at the year of the study then you come up with my contribution (the big part from words) by taking the mean for all of these studies and come up with my justification and that can be with 2000 words also that was related to my introduction and methodology in attachment check it please because I made little edit from last time you send it to me .. make sure you only talk about direct cost ,, also don’t forget the references please.
Also I upload one PDF (SR china) I want you to look at it as example.
 
Discussion section (500 words)
Then you can make the discussion part based on all result .
 

Posted on

TО LЕАRN АBОUT АND MАKЕ THЕ LINKS BЕTWЕЕN HОW HISTОRY АND РАST АUSTRАLIАN GОVЕRNMЕNT РОLIСIЕS RЕLАTING TО INDIGЕNОUS АUSTRАLIАNS, HАS GЕNЕRАTЕD THЕ СURRЕNT РОLITIСАLLY ЕNGINЕЕRЕD INDIGЕNОUS HЕАLTH СRISЕS.

TО LЕАRN АBОUT АND MАKЕ THЕ LINKS BЕTWЕЕN HОW HISTОRY АND РАST АUSTRАLIАN GОVЕRNMЕNT РОLIСIЕS RЕLАTING TО INDIGЕNОUS АUSTRАLIАNS, HАS GЕNЕRАTЕD THЕ СURRЕNT РОLITIСАLLY ЕNGINЕЕRЕD INDIGЕNОUS HЕАLTH СRISЕS.

NUR332 – Task 3 – Written Assignment Criteria
For this assessment, the word “Indigenous”, refers to the Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people of Australia.
Undeniably Australian Government policy from the past has directly impacted upon the health status of Indigenous Australians today – The focus of this assessment will be on: – ‘Australian Indigenous Women’.
“Discuss how the Policy of Assimilation 1961, (Copy located on Blackboard) has impacted on the overall health status of Indigenous Australian women today”.
Step 1 – It is important for health professionals to gain knowledge of the pre-invasion health status of the Australian Indigenous population to understand the impact caused by Australia’s government policies. Your opening paragraph after your introduction should identify the pre-invasion health status of Indigenous Australian Women (100 words – 2 marks).
Step 2 – Provide a background statement outlining the current health status of Indigenous Australian Women and how this contrasts with their representation of health. Note – Indigenous people have their own interpretation of health which contrasts greatly to the western medical model (100 words – 2 marks).
Step 3 – Critically analyse and explain the intent of the Assimilation Policy of 1961 (use examples from the Assimilation Policy and from your Textbook). Provide brief examples of how Assimilation practices have impacted on the health status of Indigenous Australian Women today (100 words – 2 marks).
Step 4 – Identify and critically discuss the links between the Assimilation Policies intent and the present health status of Indigenous Australians Women population today specifically related to the following topics:
Australian Indigenous women and women’s business/birthing (400 words – 10 marks)
Australian Indigenous women and education/employment (400 words – 10 marks)
Australian Indigenous women and domestic violence/femicide (400 words – 10 marks)
Trauma from Assimilation Policies has had a multigenerational effect on Indigenous women. If you work in Australia as a Registered Nurse/Midwife – you will provide care for members of this population. The ‘Close the Gap’ initiative is high on the Australian Government agenda.
Step 5 – With this knowledge how can the Registered Nurse/ Midwife ensure they are working with Indigenous Women in a culturally safe way to help ‘Close the Gap’ (500 words – 10 marks)
Between – 12 – 24 references are required – The “Assimilation Policy” must be referenced (4 marks)
 
Due Date: Week 10 – 6th of October Friday 1200 midday 2017 – Assignment to be submitted via Safe Assign. No ‘draft’ submissions will be marked.                                                                      
(Early submissions will be accepted from Midday the 15th of September 2017)
 
Weighting: 50% – (50 marks)
Length: 2000 Words
 
All students please note:
In accordance with the provisions of the USC Assessment – Courses and Coursework Programs – Procedures Policy – paragraph 7.8 – Penalties for late submission of Task 3 will apply.
In accordance with the provisions of the USC Assessment – Courses and Coursework Programs – Procedures Policy – paragraph 7.9.1 – Extensions for Task 3 will only be considered on the grounds outlined in paragraph 7.9.1 and any application must be accompanied by relevant, independent supporting documentation.
 
 

Posted on

НОUSING АFFОRDАBILITY IN АUSTRАLIА

Assessment Task 3
Write a report of not more than 3000 words which explains your research method for undertaking the research project outlined in Assessment Task 1 above. You will use accurate research-based terminology, theoretical concepts and academic references to describe and justify your chosen method, Quantitative in this case. You must argue that your selected research method is an appropriate approach for conducting research to address your research problem. You must also justify your research design as well as comprehensively explaining and justifying your chosen data collection method, Quantitative in this case.
This final assessment task will build upon the content of Assessment Task 1. Upon completion, it should provide a basis for developing a research thesis, including a concise review of the literature, the problem statement and a detailed explanation of the research methods to be used. You need to include at least 8-10 references to both the core text and the academic literature.
Assignments must be written in Calibri 12 point font, using 1.5 line spacing. Paragraphs must be fully justified at both the left and right margin. Your left and right margins should be set to 3.5 cm to allow space for comments to be made by the examiner.
 

  • Explain your research method for undertaking the research project outlined in Assessment Task 1. This report (max of 3000 words) should build upon the content of Assessment Task 1.
  • You will use accurate research-based terminology, theoretical concepts and academic references to describe and justify your chosen method.
  • You must argue that your selected research method is an appropriate approach for conducting research to address your research problem, as outlined in your problem statement.
  • You must also justify your research design as well as comprehensively explaining and justifying your chosen data collection method.
  • Include a brief review of the literature.

 
Suggested Structure

  • Title – Housing Affordability in Australia
  • Problem Statement – I used the 5 W’s approach. Please refer to ppt slides.
  • Research Objectives – Please refer to ppt slides.
  • Brief Literature Review/Discussion of Prior Work. Must mention gaps in the lit review as noted in Assignment 1. (750 – 1000 words)
  • Research Design and Methods [this should cover research design, methodology, sampling, data collection methods and how data will be analysed). This is and the lit review are the core sections of the assignment (750 – 1000 words).
  • Please review the attached document (assessment 2) and ppt slides which cover these headings.
  • Must expand and justify why they were used.
  • Need to include a heading for Method for Analysis. So, what software example SPSS will be used to analyse the data and what method (Regression, Factor analysis etc)

 

  • Justification of Research Design and Methods.
  • Value of Study
  • Limitations

 

Detailed Grading Criteria

Assessment Tasks 1 and 3

 
The following marking rubric is included to help in your understanding of what your lecturers will look for when assessing written work.
 
It suggests factors or qualities that they look for to determine the levels of understanding and performance being demonstrated, and to differentiate between the various grades.
 

  A 80-100% B 70-79% C 60-69% D 50-59%
Fulfilment of overall task intent Sophisticated concepts communicated through advanced use of technique Exceeds or refines the basic task requirements. Material presented is strongly linked to task; comprehension of task is high. Sound conceptual development, problems encountered have been satisfactorily solved, resulting in well presented work Broadly completed but some parts are superficially treated, misunderstood or nearly overlooked.
Use of information (including evidence and examples) Evidence of critical or thoughtful sorting and selection. Comprehensive and accurate. Conclusions fully supported by the evidence. Conclusions are fully supported by appropriate and well organised data. May be some minor omissions. Sources fully referenced. Well researched with good use of material. Most information is appropriate, consistent and supportive of the conclusions drawn. Sources of information acknowledged. Generally accurate and appropriate; some incomplete, unsupported or inconsistent information. Requires greater effort at substantiation and wider research.
Application of theories &/or concepts dealt with in the topic or subject Creative or reflective processing of theories; understanding of how and why they are used; critical and evaluative thinking. Critical or evaluative thinking about how concepts/theories are applied; little inaccuracy or misunderstanding. Relevant concepts, etc. applied in a generally appropriate and thoughtful way. No major misunderstandings; logical connections between ideas; no serious omissions. Generally very limited application; some misunderstanding or quite superficial treatment.
Structure and organisation Structure and sequence are used effectively to help integrate ideas or support logical argument. Soundly structured throughout. Ideas are sequenced in a logically satisfying way; connections between different themes or sections are well made. Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow. Introductory and concluding sections used effectively. Well enough structured to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the topic. Instances of irrelevance or confusion.
Use of language and adherence to academic conventions Powerful, confident and precise use of language; mastery of style and tone. Near perfect acknowledgement of sources throughout the paper Language use demonstrates precision and expressiveness as well as clarity. Evidence of appropriate citation of work Language is generally sound and clear throughout. Some evidence of appropriate citation of work. Clear enough to be understood; some confused or unclear expression. Spelling, punctuation and grammar generally satisfactory but likely to need attention. Poor referencing