Author: admin

Attached Files: File HIST 1302 NSC-68.pdf (1.864 MB) File HIST 1302 Patriot Act.pdf (227.66 KB) Carefully read and analyze the following documents: NSC-68 which was disseminated in April 1950 by the United States National Security Council and the Patriot Act which Congress passed after the terrorist attacks in September 2001. Based on these two documents, and what you have learned in your HIST 1302 class, consider these questions: What is the exact challenge the United States faces, according to the primary document? What were the ideological, political, and economic differences between the United States and the Soviet Union? What were the major security concerns for the United States? What strategies did the United States government believe would best protect the country’s values and national security? How did the United States government intend to enlist the assistance of its citizens to ensure political, economic, and cultural security? Explain the relationship between post-war Soviet espionage and the emergence of internal security and loyalty programs under Truman and Eisenhower. The government often infringes on civil liberties in order to protect national security, is this constitutionally sound? Why or why not? Having considered these questions, write an essay of at least 800 words that: Makes a specific argument that can be supported with the specific historical evidence of these two primary documents, as well as lecture notes and the textbook assigned to your class; Analyzes the historical significance of these two primary documents; Analyzes the nature of the Cold War in the 1950s; Evaluates the similarities and differences between NSC-68 and the Patriot Act; Is written in standard English, with all sources and quotes properly cited using MLA format; Is written in your own words, not copied and pasted from other sources or web sites; Is submitted through eCampus by clicking the CORE OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT link above.

Your job in this assignment is to enter into the critical conversation about the effects of the internet on learning, knowledge, memory, concentration, and thinking. To do so, write an argumentative essay, between about 1,000 and 1,500 words, that answers the question posed by Nicholas Carr: Is Google making us stupid? Your essay should make your own position clear, and drawing on your own experiences, your analysis of Carr’s argument, our class discussions, and your research into outside sources in order to make an argument that answers Carr’s question. One of your goals in this assignment should be to establish a sense of ethos, or character and credibility. Do so by indicating that you share your audience’s values, by showing your own experiences with the internet, and by demonstrating that you have done your homework about the subject matter by looking into what others have said about Carr’s claims. Link: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/

No title page. Just 2 references If your last name starts with L-Z your primary post examines Moral Courage: Consider situations where a GN is taken off orientation prematurely, a physician’s order is obtained after nursing action is taken, or an omitted intervention (vital sign, medication, or treatment) is charted as having been done. You will select one set of questions to respond to after reading Kleinman or Murray, & Lachman articles that are live-linked here. Moral Courage: Dr. Kleinman (2006) believes “gradual erosion” of ethics takes place subconsciously (Ethical Drift: When good people do bad things). Drift occurs in a normally well-grounded individual outside of awareness, as a series of tiny exceptions to personal rules or moral values. Continual acceptance of the “lesser of two evils”, results in the nurse straying far off original course until disaster prompts self-examination. Do you agree with the author’s stated cause of the “ethos gap”? Why or why not? The author believes we are now practicing under very different ethical theories than ever before. Why, and do you agree? How can you develop better self-awareness in the workplace to prevent drift? Or Murray offers multiple definitions of “moral courage” in Moral Courage in Healthcare: Acting ethically even in the presence of risk. Lachman (2016) defines moral courage through the behaviors seen in resilient nurses. You may want to consider her list of quotes that place the concept of moral courage into words before composing your own definition, Moral Resilience – Lachman 2016. Compose a personal definition of moral courage. Review the list of behaviors that inhibit moral courage (Murray, linked above, provides Kidder’s 2005 list – you will see a table). Have you experienced one or more of these inhibitors? Explain your response. 3. Do you have moral courage?

Unit 2.1 DB: Theories of Social Welfare Choose one theory of the US social welfare system. List the strengths and weaknesses of this theory. How does it help explain the evolution of social welfare policy in the US? Why or why not? 8 8 8 1. Unit 2.2 DB: Policy Brief 2. Read a policy brief/report from either the Brookings Institute or the Hoover Institution and address the following questions: 1 How does the brief/report compare with the description of policy analysis in your required readings? 3. Do you think the analysis comes more from a rational perspective or a political perspective? Why? 3 Do you support changes being made to your selected policy? Why or why not? Be sure to include a link and reference to the brief/report. In the response to your peers, explain the reason you agree or disagree with changes being made to their selected policy. Always properly cite any sources you may use in your writings. 6 6 6 Unit 2.3 DB: Submit Your Topic of Choice for Policy Paper In this discussion, submit a thread (300 or more words) sharing the policy topic you would like to write about for the paper that is due in Unit 7. This topic should be of importance to you; this will help in writing your paper. Be sure to include two reasons why there is a problem with this social welfare policy. Provide helpful feedback to at least two of your peers for your responses. • Complete Policy Paper Instructions and Rubric * For ideas on topics, see the listed topics above or refer to the following resources: * Hoover Institution: http://www.hoover.org/ * Brookings Institute: http://www.brookings.edu/ * Chapter 4 of the textbook • Box 4.8 from pages 109-113 contains policy research websites * Ideas for this policy paper topic include but are not limited to: * Policy for women and children * Policy for LGBTQ * Income security and the policies that include retirement, disability, death, and unemployment * TANF and drug testing * Social Security * Education (e.g. Head Start and free tuition) * Mental health treatment and incarceration * Poverty * Child abuse and protection book https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/#/ linda.ayodele@students.post.edu Khalil1986_

Writing Project 2 Purpose: For this essay, you will carefully read a “text” and discuss the messages that text conveys to readers. Course Learning Objectives: Rhetorical knowledge, development and critical thinking, organization, conventions of style and usage, documentation of sources. Form / Design: This essay should be double-spaced, in twelve point font, and at least 1,250 words. It should follow APA or MLA format. If you wish to use another documentation style, ask me for permission. Audience: Your audience for this project should be others who have read and understood the same work that you are reading. Your tone should be academic, so avoid contractions and overly colloquial language. Process Work: You will need to submit an early draft for review and a final draft for a grade. I assume you are completing additional process work to support your writing including taking notes on your sources, brainstorming, outlining, etc. Please save ALL of your process work, from start to finish. You will need it for your portfolio. Specifics: For this assignment, you will choose a text that represents, discusses, comments on, and / or provides inspiration regarding some aspect of who you are, once were, or want to be. You will read it closely and carefully, paying careful attention to what the text conveys both explicitly and implicitly. You will unpack implications. You will discuss what the text “means” as well as how it creates meaning. Ultimately, you will analyze the text and construct an arguable thesis related to the text. You will explain and defend your position.

The purpose of this assignment is for you to learn how to file a small claims lawsuit. As discussed in class, small claims court is a great way for people to be able to resolve their differences over relatively small amounts of money at little cost to either party. The idea behind having such hearings is that there should be a cheap and easy way for people to be able to get a judge to rule on any given dispute. All you have to do for this assignment is describe how you would file a small claims lawsuit in the event you ever had to. In the future if you ever have any business disputes in your personal life you will have benefited by doing this assignment because you will know exactly what you need to do to file a small claims suit. You will also know what to do in the event you are ever sued in small claims court. You may use the San Mateo County or Santa Clara County Courts, or any other court in California. Please specify which court you are using in your paper. Answer ALL of the following questions: A) Where do you obtain the form you need to file a small claims suit against another person. Attach a copy or link to a website of this form to your paper. B) In your own words, summarize the steps to file a small claims suit in Santa Clara County. Here are some questions you should answer in your paper: • What are the legal requirements for Small Claims Court? • Where does one file such an action? With whom? What hours? • What topics does a small claims suit include? • What is the age limit, if any, to file a claim? • What is the dollar limit one can sue for? • What specific papers must be filed? How much does it cost to file? • Can an attorney be present at your appearance? Why or why not? C) Explain what you learned from this assignment. Your paper should be typed in Times New Roman 12-point size fonts, 1-inch margin all around, double-spaced, and about 3-5 pages NOT including cover, title, or references.

The primary goal of the Learning and Cognition Handbook is to integrate concepts from the discipline of learning and cognitive psychology into a usable and professional guide that is designed for a specified audience which will be designated based on students’ current or future career goals. Students will choose one of five assigned constructs and focus their handbook on this specific area of learning and cognition. Skills and information learned throughout the course will be applied in the design and creation of this handbook. Findings from required sources, including those from the text and individual peer-reviewed articles, will be incorporated into the handbook; however, these findings will not constitute the total information for each of the sub-constructs addressed within the project. Students should include the relevant sources they researched in the Week Two Discipline-Based Literature Review as well as those from the Week Three Assignment. The purpose of the handbook is to share helpful strategies, apply the chosen construct to seven sub-constructs in the field, and present a holistic guide for others that can be used in the discipline. To complete this assignment, students may utilize the Learning and Cognition Handbook template (Links to an external site.) or create their own using the template as a guide. Each section of the handbook should be written in the student’s own words with use of limited paraphrased material cited according to APA standards as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Each section of the handbook should include a minimum of one visual (e.g., table, figure, or image) with a maximum of five visuals per section. Each image must be retrieved and cited based on current copyright laws. Students may wish to use the Where to Get Free Images guide (Links to an external site.) for assistance with accessing freely available public domain and/or Creative Commons licensed images. The following constructs will be the subject content options for this handbook and will be chosen based on an evaluative literature review in Week Two and students’ future career goals: • The Neurosciences: A Look at Our Brains • Socio-Cognition: Social Interactions in Learning • Learning and Literacy: Reading, Writing, and Language Development • Diversity and Culture: The Effects to Learning • Connectionism and Learning: A Web of Development The sections listed below must be used within the paper to delineate the sections of content. Table of Contents In this section, students will list all sections and subsections included in the handbook with the applicable page numbers. Preface In this section, students will provide a 100- to 150-word overview of the handbook and its potential use by the chosen audience. Introduction to Chosen Construct In this section, students will provide a 200- to 300-word introductory summary of the chosen construct and discuss any careers in psychology specifically related to this construct. Beginning with the work completed in Week One, students will include the language from their personal epistemology (revised based on instructor feedback and the further development of their ideas and beliefs throughout the course and the program thus far). Chosen Construct In this section, students will provide information that communicates how and why the chosen construct of learning and cognition affects the following sub-constructs through synthesizing the learning principles and/or theories. For each of the sub-constructs, students will apply basic research methods and skeptical inquiry to explain the theoretical perspectives and empirical findings that substantiate the relationship between the construct and the sub-constructs. Although creative liberties are encouraged, all information incorporated should be supported and professionally presented through the consistent application of ethical principles and adherence to professional standards of learning and cognition psychology as applied to the chosen audience. Sub-Constructs Information for each sub-construct will be presented in 500 to 700 words. • Comprehension • Problem Solving • Memory Development/Retention • Lifelong Learning • Domains and Domain Learning • Affective Outcomes of Emotion • Effects of Demographic Differences (e.g., gender, socioeconomics, religious affiliation, race) Conclusion In this section, students will provide a 200- to 300-word summarization of the handbook in which they describe the importance of the chosen construct and assigned sub-constructs within the learning and cognition domain and their applicability within the psychology profession for the chosen audience. Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Pathbrite portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this Learning and Cognition Handbook, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to Pathbrite (Links to an external site.) and upload the revised Learning and Cognition Handbook to the portfolio. (Use the Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide (Links to an external site.) to create an account if you do not already have one.) The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool. See the Pathbrite website for information and further instructions on using this portfolio tool. The Learning and Cognition Handbook • Must be 4000 to 7000 words (see instructions and rubric for each section and sub-construct) following the Learning and Cognition Handbook template (Links to an external site.) as a guide. Although a handbook differs from a written paper, all citations and references must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.). • Must include a title page with the required information from the handbook template: o Title of handbook o Student’s name o Institution’s name o Student’s contact information (address and email) o Course name and number o Instructor’s name o Date submitted • Must include the sections and subsections required as indicated in the handbook template. • Must address the construct and sub-constructs with critical thought and substantiated assertions. • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center at the end of the handbook and precedes any optional appendices if applicable to the project.

This what I wrote so far in this chapter. I was meant to do my interview through Skype as mentioned in the proposal but I decided to fly from England to Saudi Arabia to do my interview face to face in SKAMCO company. My interview basically gonna be semi structured questions interview with a maximum 30 minutes using my phone to record the interview. Most interviews gonna be in Arabic. After finishing the interviews I will take each one and write a summary about each person after translate then in English to prove that I have done the interviews and this is how I want to enter my findings.You also have to edit and rewrite everything I have already wrote in this chapter to meet all requirements in this order.
Please if there is any question do not hesitate. i will also upload both proposal and literature review so you can fully understand what my dissertation on about.
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
3.1. Chapter introduction
This chapter describes the procedure that was used during the study. This includes data sources, data collection methods used in gathering information from these sources and the methods used in analysing data.
3.2. Data sources
The data sources used during the study included:
• Reviewing literature about change management in Saudi Arabia.
• Case study analysis of change management.
• Interview the employees work at SaadKhafir Al Musaad& Partners Group (SKAMCO)
3.3. Data collection methods
The data collection methods used during the study included interviews.
3.3.2. Interviews
An interview is a one-on-one conversation where a researcher poses semi structured questions to the interviewee in order to elicit facts. Additionally, they gave the researcher the opportunity to probe the respondent and thereby getting more reliable information. This probing also ensured that the validity and reliability of information was upheld.
3.3.4. • Reviewing literature about change management in construction projects in Saudi Arabia.
3.4. Sampling
Due to the high number of workers in SKAMCO Company, it was not feasible to include all of them in the study. Therefore, a sample of these employees was used as a representation of the sample population.
3.4.1. Sample size
The total sample size was 11. This sample size included 3 departmentmanagers such as Financial, human resource and IT, 6 employees, and 1 General Manager and 1 chairman. All the participants in the study were males.
3.4.2. Procedure for administering interviews
The interviewees were allowed to give the time when they felt they were ready for the interviews. Maximum interview duration was 00:30. Most interviews was in Arabic. Using a phone record during the interview to keep data and play it again.
3.5. Data analysis

Begin Critical Essay 1: Write a 2-page analysis of an experience in which communication with a co-worker went wrong. Diagnose the problem by describing how the parts of the communication process (sender, message, receiver, feedback, and noise) contributed to the problem. Use your text, class exercises, and discussion to help you. It is ok to use a fictitious name for your co-worker. Submit Critical Essay 1 that you were assigned in Week 1. Write a 2-page analysis of an experience in which communication with a co-worker went wrong. Diagnose the problem by describing how the parts of the communication process (sender, message, receiver, feedback, and noise) contributed to the problem. Use your text, class exercises, and discussion to help you. It is ok to use a fictitious name for your co-worker.

EBP and Informatics Assignment From Readings, Assignments, and Discussions, the students will be able to: 1. Recognize the basic concepts and terminology associated with nursing research and informatics. 2. Discuss the relationship between quality improvement, informatics, and evidence-based practice. Readings: http://www.amia.org/glossary McManus, R., Nemec, E., C., Ferer, D., S., & Gumpper, K., F. (2012). Suggested definitions for informatics terms: Interfacing, integration, and interoperability. American Journal of HealthSystem Pharmacy, 69(13), 1163–1165. doi:10.2146/ajhp110612 Activity: Write a one paragraph (Maximum 500 words) description of the following: Who in your workplace is responsible for implementation and ongoing maintenance of the electronic medical record (EMR)? How were nurses involved in the implementation of EMR? How is the EMR used for quality improvement in your institution or agency? Identify one recommendation for improvement in application of informatics to the practice setting. Use appropriate terminology in describing the implementation. Include discussion of one evidencebased resource (beyond readings) applying informatics in practice. (5 points) Rubric: Nurses role in informatics 1 Use in quality improvement 1 Discussion of reference 1 Terminology 1 APA citation/reference 1 Total 5