Author: admin

 
Under the supervision of your instructor, you are required to write one (1) UAE or GCC case company and target for case journal submission that present your analysis/findings about issues regarding Strategic Management in the company of your choice. In your case paper you must:
 

• Organize and outline your own selected case research on any contemporary issues of Strategic Management.
• Frame your case study paper in order to define the current state of knowledge and present your particular case.
• The case studies paper must illustrate how strategy is formulated or implemented; appropriate economic and policy reviews, etc.
• Communicate formally your position through writing that is designed to influence others and gain acceptance of your strategies for overcoming any organization problems relating to issues of strategic management in organizations with particular reference to the UAE commercial environment.
• Keep your case study paper focus on relevant issues.
• Present a unique solution or a unique approach to overcoming any organization problems and dilemmas based on the evidence you present in your case analysis.
• Establish your credibility. Here you are demonstrating that you have a command of the issues and the research behind them, and can present them clearly and concisely.
• Provide a non-objection letter/certificate from the case company to publish your case findings.

 
For case journal submission, you are required to:

• Select target case journal to publish your case. In this case: Emerald Emerging Market Case Study Journal
• Provide non-objection letter – consent for case publication.
• Reference your work using APA standards.
• In order to ensure your works are clean error free, submit your written case for proofread.

 
Some guidelines:
If you work within an organization, you may develop position case study papers that are consistent with current strategic management views. Make sure that you develop supporting evidence for your point of view including verification of information, factual knowledge, statistical/financial evidence (if any) and authoritative testimony.
 
You should identify the issues and prejudices keeping in mind your audience in terms of being prepared to list and anticipate any counterclaims. Assume familiarity with basic concepts but define unfamiliar terms and concepts and be clear on your meanings that define your position.
 
Possible topics and areas for your case research:
The topic covers all facets of strategic management in both private and public organizations. You are not limited to these and may develop others:   
 

• Strategic decision making
• Strategic competition
• Alliances and partnering
• Joint ventures
• Merger and acquisitions
• Strategic implementation
• Leadership
• Entrepreneurship
• Small business ventures
• New ventures creation
• Competitive position of organization
• Internationalization / international business
• Hospitality / Tourism
• Knowledge management

 
In addition to your written case research papers, you are required to:
 

1. Make an oral presentation (based on Teaching Note) with supporting power point slides lasting 15 minutes for your case.
2. Provide a proof of submission of your case paper to a case journal.

 
Soft and hard copies of your papers are required headed MGMT2 with your name and student number.
 

The situation at Good Health Hospital has become a bit overwhelming ever since the outbreak of E. coli in Ward 10 on the second floor. It appears that there are six (6) cases of the disease. To better understand the situation, communication with the CDC has revealed that this particular bacterium can be found in many everyday items. The CDC recommends that investigation begins in the hospital kitchens, since E. coli can be transmitted via contaminated vegetables, as well as delicatessen meats such as salami and other cold cuts. The following table shows the number of cases identified so far:
Case Age Gender
1 23 M
2 21 F
3 15 M
4 42 F
After meeting yesterday with chief administrator Joe Wellborn, it has been decided that the litigation issues with one (1) of the patients may need further information to determine if the patient was already symptomatic with the bacteria prior to admission.
Research has indicated that hospitals operating in the Tampa Bay area have been known to have cases of E. coli contamination. This substantiates the need for further investigations by the County Health Department.
Due to the severity of the cases, and the potential for further spread, it is recommended that the hospital seek alternate vending services since the present suppliers cannot verify sanitation protocols for their products.
In conclusion, the study done at Good Health Hospital has indicated that the E. coli outbreak was in fact caused by spoil food from the cafeteria.
As a social science researcher working for a regional hospital, you are placed in charge of contacting the DOH from your home state, as well as the CDC for statistical data on nosocomial diseases that frequently cause illness at your health care facility. Using information from both agencies, evaluate the data on common nosocomial diseases and compile a treatment contingency plan for dealing with the hospital infections.
Write a five to six (5-6) page evaluation report in which you:
1. Analyze Good Health Hospital’s records and itemize recent nosocomial infections that occurred within the past year. In your report, categorize the different parameters (i.e., person, time, place, ethnicity, and gender) used in the compilation of data into the information summative.
2. Propose at least six (6) questions for the health care administrator at Good Health Hospital, regarding potential litigation issues with infections from the nosocomial diseases. Rationalize, in your report, the logic behind your six (6) questions.
3. Identify a targeted audience within Good Health Hospital, and prepare an implementation plan based on your hypothetical meeting with the hospital health care administrator. Propose four (4) steps that will be useful in the final implementation plan.
4. Suggest at least five (5) recommendations to your department head based on the steps taken in the implementation plan. Provide rationale for your suggestions.
5. Using these approved recommendations, design a safety protocol itinerary that must be placed in public access areas of the hospital.
6. Use at least four (4) peer-reviewed academic resources in this assignment. These must come from journal sources. Note: Fact Sheets, Wikipedia, and non-academic Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
• Examine epidemiology as it relates to population, environment, transmission, and prevention.
• Examine the application of epidemiology to specific diseases.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in managerial epidemiology.
• Write clearly and concisely about managerial epidemiology using proper writing mechanics.

Research paper Qualitative Research Validity
1) Compare and contrast the characteristics of
• external,
• internal,
• construct validity.
2) Identify the threats to
• internal,
• external
• and construct validity.
3) Discuss how validity issues could impact Topic: Outsourcing Compliance and Governance of Ethics in Healthcare Organization

Remember for your paper you want to paraphrase your evidence and discuss each theme in a succinct manner. Your introduction will need better development before you start the paper. A strong topic/thesis statement and themes help to guide your paper.
In Topic 2, you were asked to read three articles on the topic of doctoral identity and to complete an annotated bibliography to demonstrate their understanding of the material. In Topic 3, you were asked to take this process a step further and identify themes found in the three articles and to complete a synthesis worksheet where the themes were supported by evidence from each article. In this assignment, you will build on your worksheet efforts and write a paper about the three themes. The narrative will not only present the evidence from the articles to support the identified themes, but also will provide an analysis for each theme by synthesizing the information collected.
General Requirements:
•Locate the Synthesis Worksheet you completed in Topic 3.
•Locate and download “Synthesis Paper Template” from the Course Materials for this topic.
•Review the articles by Baker & Pifer (2011), Gardner (2009), and Smith & Hatmaker (2014) located in the Course Materials for this topic.
Directions:
Using the Synthesis Worksheet you completed and considering the themes you developed and the feedback provided by your instructor, write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that synthesizes the three articles.
Your paper should include the following:
1.An introduction that introduces and provides context for the topic. This includes giving a brief description of each article and its purpose, identifying the three themes that emerged from your reading, describing how they will be discussed in the paper, and presenting a clear thesis statement.
2.Support for your identified themes with evidence from each article. Provide analysis of these findings to strengthen your narrative.
3.A discussion of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. What is the overall message of the group of articles?
1. Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines
Gardner, S. K. (2009).
Conceptualizing auccess in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406. doi: 10.1353/rhe.0.0075
2. Knowing, Doing, and Becoming: Professional Identity Construction among Public Affairs Doctoral Students
Review:
Smith, A. E., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2014). Knowing, doing, and becoming: Professional identity construction among public affairs doctoral students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(4), 545-564.
3. The Role of Relationships in the Transition from Doctor to Independent Scholar
Review:
Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctor to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5-17. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515569

Currently

part 1
If you would design a lab, what would the blueprint look like?
In this assignment you will draw a blueprint of a clinical lab that includes the following departments:
Core Lab
Microbiology
Blood Bank
Phlebotomy
1 manager office
1 supervisor office
1 employee breakroom
2 employee restrroms
This is a busy lab – sample volume-wise. Refer to the scenario in Part 2 of your third discussion forum for a breakdown of how this lab is staffed, what equipment is available, and other expectations of the department.
Complete this lab in ONE of the following ways:
You may simply draw the lab blueprint, labeling each section.
You may use computer-aided design, if you are familiar.
You may search for and utilize any free, online tools that allow you to draw blueprint/schematics. Here is an example: Online Blueprint Tool – Free to Try,
Make sure that your lab floorplan is designed with LEAN principles in mind. A good rule to follow is “the less steps between task, the better” or “do more, with less but without sacrificing quality”. For more information on Lean, please use this link :
https://www.lean.org/WhatsLean/Principles.cfm
__________________________
part 2 :
explain how you, as the lab manager, would implement the following change using Lean Management techniques:
Your blood bank is changing methodology. You will be moving from tube testing to gel card testing for all ABO/Rh and antibody screening.
You have a few challenges:
Out of 10 full time employees, only 3 have experience with gel methodology. Each of these 3 employees work on difference shifts.
The lab director wants you to go live with this implementation 4 weeks from the date when the gel stations are installed in the blood bank.
You testing volume is extremely large. Per 8 hour shift, the lab easily completes an average of 50 type and screens.
You have two employees who are extremely negative about this change.
You also have a few benefits:
The lab manager will approve overtime for your staff.
The instrument purchase contract provides training for staff between the hours of 8 and 4, Monday through Friday.
Most of your staff is excited about moving to this methodology.
In this discussion post, state steps that you will take to ensure that this implementation is smooth and happens by the expected deadline for go live. Address the following in your discussion :
How you will engage the staff?
A weekly plan of steps to be completed prior to go live.
Communication strategies with the staff and lab management.
Steps taken to mitigate potential problems that may arise during this 4 week period.
Your role in this process. How will you make this implementation smooth and ensure that patient care is your top priority?

Handout for second essay assignment
Please write a 3-4 page paper (double-spaced, with 12 point font and no more than 1″ margins) on the question below.
The essay should also include a bibliography (a Works Cited page) which is in addition to the 3-4 pages of text you’ll be writing. Please follow the same MLA guidelines for formatting a Works Cited and in-text parenthetical citations as you did in the first essay (go back and refer to the first essay handout, if you need to review the citation guidelines).
Writing Objectives
Please be sure that your essay includes a thesis (a main argument or statement of opinion) in the introductory paragraph. The introduction should also include the main points (at least three!) that you’re going to develop in the body of the essay (so, it has a sort of “road map” of what you’re going to cover). Each of those main points should be supported and developed using quotations or examples from the readings or from observations you’ve made in your own life.
A good way to begin is to make a list of points that you have observed. Derive your thesis or the main point you wish to make from that list. Brainstorm. What other points on the list seem to support the main argument (the thesis) that you have come up with? Then go to the readings and find supporting quotations for these points, and develop these in the body paragraphs. Essays should be a minimum of five paragraphs but your essay can certainly include more body paragraphs.
This essay will be graded on its clarity, its arguments and its organization. As I said above, be sure to include a THESIS in the introductory paragraph and develop good examples and arguments to support that thesis. Each paragraph should include a topic sentence that is the subject of that paragraph. You should also include a strong conclusion that draws on the points you present in the body. The conclusion should be a separate paragraph that restates the thesis and drives your main arguments home.
Be sure to cite ALL of your primary and secondary sources using in-text citations within parentheses, as you did for your first essay. Any time you incorporate a quotation or a specific example, statistic, etc., you should include a citation to show the source where you got that information.
Essay Topic
Most of the readings we’ve completed so far discuss the impact of stereotypes that are rooted in identities of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, or class stereotypes (and many readings discussed identities that were rooted in the “intersections” or overlaps between one or more of those identities).
These are the readings you have to use for this paper-
-Race, Class and Gender: Article 37, Tiffany Manuel and Ruth Enid Zambrana, “Exploring the Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, and Class on Maternity Leave Decisions,” pp.307-313.
-Article 35, “Gender Matters. So Do Race and Class,” Sandra E. Weissinger, pp. 285-293.
-Race, Class and Gender: Article 54, “The Color of Justice,” Michelle Alexander, pp. 419-423.
-Article 13, “Closing the Wealth Gap: A Review of Racial and Ethnic Inequalities in Homeownership.”
In this paper please select at least THREE of the readings and compare and contrast how these stereotypes are created, what they consist of, and the impact that they have, according to the authors of the readings you’ve chosen. You may also include observations from your own experience, but you should be SURE to discuss at least three of the readings for the course, as well. You can discuss more than three, if you want to.
You can choose any three, and if you wanted to, you could compare the creation and impact of stereotypes across categories: that is, you could compare how racial stereotypes operate in conjunction with stereotypes rooted in ideas about gender or how race and sexual orientation intersect in the construction of stereotypes. Or you could discuss how class identities intersect with notions of gender in the creation of particular stereotypes.
OR you could choose three readings that are similar, and which allow you to discuss one particular sort of stereotype in depth. For example, you could look at stereotyping: as it affects men from different racial or ethnic backgrounds; the stereotyping of poor/working class people; the stereotyping women/women’s bodies; or the stereotyping of people with different sexual orientations/identities. Again, these are simply suggestions. Come up with your own–just make sure you look three authors to support your conclusions. This paper is a little trickier than you think so be warned
Think about the idea of “self-fulfilling nature of stereotypes/ internalization of racism/or stereotypes.” What coping mechanisms do people devise to deal with stereotyping? Can you give specific examples from the readings you chose? Do not give me summaries of the readings (we’ve done that!). Instead of summarizing, you should analyze: what authors agree with each other? Which of them disagree? Why? I don’t want book reports but critiques and analysis of the works at hand comparing and contrasting the authors’ key points throughout the paper, along with your own thoughts on these issues.

Topic:
Consumer Attitudes towards Luxury Car Brands: A case Study of Mercedes Benz on Chinese Consumers 1.Your Tutor Notes
1. The dissertation should first analyses from Mercedes Benz view about advertisement, strategy, emphasize market and so on in China. Then analyses about the customers, which is about the questionnaire. After these are the compare and match between the strategy of Mercedes Benz and customers behaviour.
2. About the questionnaire, first should mix the SECTION III and SECTION IV into one SECTION. And the question 14 should in SECTION II and question 7 should in SECTION III. Add one question about car repaired service in SECTION III. Put an open question answer in question 16 and 17 to ask about other reasons for customer like Mercedes Benz. There also should be one question to ask to buy a car is business use or personal use.
2.Addition note
The structure of your final report/dissertation is usually as follows. You can adjust the structure but only with reasonable justifications?
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework (Literature Review)
3. Methodology
4. Presentation of Findings
5. Analysis/Discussion of Findings
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
Bibliography and Appendices
MUST sign the high level top 10 writer now give me quality paper .100% make sure pass . Add the proof double check. Must check all additional file and link the my all addtional file and download all of it read one by one . Upload the draft in 48hours for my meeting Extend revision timeframe to 30 days as per terms and conditions Follow instructions and no extension for deadline Please send draft for this order within 48 hours

Note: Items are listed as per their due date. Read at your own pace, however all
assignments must be completed as per the dates listed below.
*Assignment #1
Read: From the Text: Westlake, E.J. World Theatre: The Basics. 1st Edition. New York: Routledge, 2017.
 Chapter 2: South and Southeast Asia AND
 Chapter 3: East Asia
QUESTION for PAPER #2: Read carefully and answer each question. (Worth 15 Points)
Based on the reading Chapter 2: South and Southeast Asia, please write a reflective commentary on the discussion of the story The Little Clay Cart (original Sanskrit name Mrichchhakatika) in the section titled THE LITTLE CLAY CART: BRAHMINICAL VALUES IN AN ORIGINAL TEXT in. Focus your response on your reactions to the story. What did you like? Why? Identify significant themes and characters. How is this story different/unique? Was this story revealing of culture and theatrical traditions? How so? Elaborate.
Please pay close attention to the paper submission requirements/guidelines:
 Incorporate an academic style of writing.
 Weekly papers must be between 2-3 pages (double spaced).
 Please respect the assigned page limit for each paper. Between 2-3 pages is ideal. Not less than 2 full pages, and do not exceed 3 pages. Submissions that fail to meet the required number of words will be marked INCOMPLETE. Incompletes are worth zero points.
 Each submission has an assigned due date. Papers will be submitted to the instructor via email at radhica.ganapathy@mail.wvu.edu
 Include top right corner: Your Name, Course Name and Section, Instructor Name, Date, Title your paper, 1 Inch Margins, Font size 12, Times New Roman, Page Numbers, and Double Spaced.
Ganapathy Page |2
 Clear use of citations, if necessary, is extremely important to avoid issues of
academic dishonesty.
 Do not use direct quotes.
 Careful proof reading is essential prior to submission.
 Works cited, if applicable, should be in an accepted MLA style format (Modern Language Association) and on a separate/additional page. *Please google MLA Citation for assistance.

Welcome to our next discussion about Greek architecture. Although the days of Classical Greece are long past, we still experience elements of Greek architecture in the Neoclassical styles of our banks, libraries, government buildings, universities, entertainment & performance venues.
In this practice discussion, you will apply ideas from the "How to Analyze Architecture" worksheet to at least two different temples discussed in this module, but you can pick the temples you want to discuss!
The goal of this discussion is to demonstrate that you can:
1. Identify and use architectural terminology to describe the architectural features of at least two different temples of your choice from this module
2. Apply ideas from the required worksheet to analyze the temples of your choice from this module
3. Document your research process and cite according to MLA guidelines, as needed
Any amount of plagiarized material in writing or video is not accepted and will result in an F "0" points for this assignment. You do not need to submit your responses to turnitin.com but note I will if I have any concerns about the academic integrity of your response.
Directions: Pick at least two different Temples from the list below: (Please include picture of the temple in your post so we all can be reminded of what it looks like)
Temple of Hera I “Basilica”, Paestum, Italy, 550 BC
Temple of Aphaia, Aegina, Greece, 500-490 BC
Temple of Hera II, Paestum, Italy, 460 BC
Parthenon, by Iktinos and Kallikrates, on the Acropolis, Athens, 447-438 BC
Temple of Athena Nike, by Kallikrates, on the Acropolis, Athens, 427-424 BC
Erechtheion, on the Acropolis, Athens, 421-05 BC
Now practice applying ideas from the topics below, to your temple. It’s OK to respond point by point, posting more frequent responses throughout the week, and demonstrate how the ideas from the worksheet connects to your temple. Do your best to answer as many of the points on the worksheet as you can, but if in your research you find some of the questions cannot be answered, it is OK to skip the question and move on to the next one.
How to analyze architecture questions:
(It is OK to copy and paste the questions and respond point by point, as you’ve done in the previous modules. Questions in red are questions I think you should be able to respond to.
Who is the architect, patron, or client?
How does the building reflect the architect’s style? The patron’s wishes? (It’s OK to skip if not known)
What is the function of the building? Civic? Religious? Public? Private? Commercial? Residential? How does the building reveal its function?
What is the scale of the building in comparison to humans? Surrounding buildings?
In what context was this structure built? How is the context reflected in the structure? Consider social, political, economic, or religious factors.
How long did it take to build the structure?
Which parts of the building seem to be emphasized?
How do the parts of the building relate to other parts of the building?
How does the building interact with the environment in which it is located?
Does it incorporate similar materials as nearby programs?
Does it draw upon nearby historical styles or influences?
Does it react against historical precedence?
What shapes are repeated throughout the program? Geometric shapes? Organic shapes?
How ornamental is the facade of the building?
How is interior space defined?
What features demarcate interior space?
Is interior open and airy?
Is interior space compartmentalized?
How does light contribute to the overall effect of the building?
How do the materials contribute to the overall effect of the building?
What architectural or stylistic terminology can be used to describe features of the building?
What technology was used to build the structure? How does this technology reflect the societal development?
How do overall features of the building create a unique user experience?
It might be a good idea to post additional visuals that help to show what the various architectural components of a Greek Temple are. You should demonstrate that you KNOW architectural features of the temple you pick! Just don’t post a picture only.
Submission directions:
1. Post your response directly in this discussion, and include images, too. Do not include your response as a word doc and as an attachment, like docx, or doc files. No attachments.
2. If you prefer, you may respond in the form of a video using the AAU video tool as an alternative to writing your response. If you respond through video, please note the responses are limited to 5 minute segments, so it is OK to submit two, 5 video segments, if needed. Your response should not be more than 10 minutes, however! A 5 to 10 minute video would suffice.
The goal of this discussion is to demonstrate that you can:
1. Identify and use architectural terminology to describe the temple of your choice from this module
2. Apply ideas from the required worksheet to analyze the temple of your choice from this module
3. Document your research process and cite according to MLA guidelines, as needed
please use MLA research paper from web!!!
also include at least 2 images.
Any amount of plagiarized material in writing or video is not accepted and will result in an F "0" points for this assignment. You do not need to submit your responses to turnitin.com but note I will if I have any concerns about the academic integrity of your response.
In this discussion, demonstrate that you are practicing USING the required worksheet to analyze the temple you picked from this module. Post visuals, but use your words to describe what you see, and always paraphrase researched information and cite it following MLA standards.

Overview
The enduring relevance of the humanities is that they encourage us to consider a number of “big ideas.” What is culture? How do we go about studying it? What is the relationship between cultural artifacts and the culture in which they are created? What is the relationship between artists and the creators of “cultural artifacts” and the things they create? How is human meaning generated through cultural creations? We humans seem driven to express and create in our search to understand and be understood.
You will complete two related projects in this course that will be turned in separately. In Project 1, you will choose an artifact of human creative expression and respond to a series of questions about it to complete an artifact chart. In Project 2, you will use the insights gained from completing Project 1 to answer a series of short-answer responses about human expression.
For Project 1, you will choose an artifact of human creative expression from the world around you. This artifact can take any form and can be from any physical modality (visual, aural, tactile, etc.). The key is that you choose a form of expression you might experience any day that intrigues you and makes you want to know more about it. Once you have chosen your artifact, you will respond to the elements below on the provided artifact chart, culminating in questions about the artifact and what it might represent. You will use the insights you gain here when completing Project 2.
Project 1 will assess the following course outcomes, which you focus on throughout Themes 1 and 2:
 Develop questions about fundamental aspects of human culture that inform personal assumptions, beliefs, and values using evidence from cultural artifacts and systems
 Determine fundamental approaches to studying the humanities in addressing questions about how cultural artifacts and the culture they are created in have influenced each other
Prompt
Choose an artifact from the world around you that you could encounter any day. Use the provided artifact chart to think deeply about the artifact and its representation of human creative expression. Your responses should be recorded on the artifact chart.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Describe the artifact in detail. For instance, how would you describe it to someone who could not see it?
II. Choose elements of the artifact that you believe are most important to how you experience it and explain why. For instance, what particularly catches
your senses or makes you want to keep experiencing it? Does the choice of medium impact your experience?
III. State your opinion on what you believe is the purpose of this artifact and the success of the creator in achieving the purpose. For instance, what
message do you believe the creator is trying to express, and is that message successfully expressed?
IV. Discuss how the artifact reflects the culture (or context) in which it exists. Be sure to address what aspects of culture have relevance for this artifact: politics, history, religion, social perceptions, technology, media, education, and so on. In other words, how do the artifact and its culture interrelate? For instance, how would a particular form of body modification reflect the urban culture in which you encountered it?
V. Use the artifact to discuss how acts of creative expression impact and are impacted by the people and situations that surround it. How might the artifact and the person who created it have impacted each other? For instance, how might the geographic location where the artifact was made, the materials used to create the artifact, the medium of the creative process, or the environment where the artifact is displayed influence the creator’s life or future creative work? How might the artifact and the culture or context in which it was created have impacted each other? For instance, does the artifact add to the understanding of the culture from which it was created? What contributions does it make to continuing on a dialogue about that culture and the importance of its artifacts?
VI. Pose questions you have after thinking deeply about this artifact. What more do you want to know regarding:
a. The relationship between human culture and expression?
b. Your personal assumptions about artifacts of this sort and why they exist?
c. How your values have shaped and are shaped by your expression and that of others?
d. The relationship between the possible intent of the creator and your own interpretation of its meaning?
VII. Speculate on how you would go about answering these questions. For instance, what sorts of things would you study about these kinds of artifacts and
their contexts that might begin addressing these questions?
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Type your responses to the prompt on the Artifact Chart. Bullet points and other notations are acceptable provided the
requirements of the prompt are met.