Author: admin

Develop a philosophy that supports advanced nursing practice reflecting the values, beliefs, and cultural competencies relative to nursing practice, science, and theory. Please see the attachment below for instructions.

Question tittle is: Prerogative powers are unconstitutional. They allow the executive too much power.’ Critically evaluate this view of prerogative powers. It is for first year Law course. Constitutional and administrative law module. Maximum word count 1500 and references need to be OSCOLA and include footnotes. Answer the question around United Kindgom. Identify the legal issues raised Formulate and structured and persuasive response Use appropriate evidence to support your argument Prioritise and sort the information you present

Unit I Scholarly Activity Sources of Knowledge Talk to an HR representative at your company. If your company does not have an HR representative, talk to a friend or family member who works in HR. Find out and record the answers to the questions below. After recording the responses received, provide a paragraph summarizing your thoughts concerning the information you learned and your thoughts relative to how that HR representative might improve upon his/her knowledge in the field (do not share your thoughts with that HR representative). This assignment should be at least two double-spaced pages in length. 1. What type of training did you receive in order to perform your job? 2. Did you receive training on statutes such as ADA, FMLA, ADEA, and Title VII? 3. Which statute do you find yourself dealing with most often? 4. Describe the most challenging employee problem you had to deal with related to one of those statutes, and how was it resolved (omit the name(s) of the employees)? 5. What is the most common/routine type of employee relation issue you have to deal with? 6. Do you interact with legal counsel, either house counsel (in-house), hired outside counsel to represent the company, or opposing counsel representing the employee? Which ones, and how often? 7. What dispute resolution mechanisms does your company utilize when trying to resolve employee relation concerns? If you could give one piece of job advice to a new HR representative on how to best handle their new responsibilities, what would it be?

How does the nurse manager or leader play a role in the reengineering of health care?

MA Dissertation

In this essay, you will discuss how compensation programs are developed and how laws can affect compensation practices. Your essay should be a minimum of three pages in length, using at least your textbook as a source. Be sure that your essay includes the following elements: issues that influence an individual’s decision to apply for or accept a specific job; how compensation plans can influence the success of an organization; how influences outside an organization can affect its compensation plan; description of the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Bennett Amendment, and Executive Order 11246; and reasons why the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Bennett Amendment, and Executive Order 11246 were implemented. Martocchio, J. J. (2017). Strategic compensation: A human resource management approach (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay is the one I want the paper to cover. Letter from a Birmingham Jail by Dr. Martin Luther King. This literary work is, in my view, the single most powerful piece of rhetorical literature from the 20th century. This one letter convinced not simply the clergy the letter was addressed to but an entire nation to bring Civil Rights to African Americans after generations of oppression. the other essays were 1.Report Essay 2.Review Essay 3.Rhetorical Analysis Essay Purpose To present the essay you found most valuable in terms of what you learned about writing in the course. Assignment Examine each of your three (3) major essays and determine which one taught you the most about communicating effectively in writing. Collect all work related to that essay including pre-writing, drafts, instructor feedback, peer comments, etc. Organize them into a coherent collection which will be accompanied by a 500 – 800 word reflective essay. In that essay you will clearly explain why you selected the essay as the one that taught you ‘most’ about writing. You may use ‘limited’ first person point of view on this one which means ‘me/my/we/our/us’ pronouns can be readily used. Avoid the “I” pronoun as those generate a personal narrative (diary or journal entry) tone. Remember that you are the narrator of the essay so the “I” pronoun is already inferred. Instead of, “I think my Rhetorical Analysis Essay was the strongest essay I have ever written” Go with, “The Rhetorical Analysis Essay was by far the strongest example of my writing.” Deadlines and Submissions Follow the deadlines for each part of this assignment as listed on your course calendar. Be sure to complete the upload to Blackboard as scheduled on the calendar. In addition to the general information provided in the syllabus, the following grading policies apply to this essay: Essays that are more than 10% outside the assigned word range will receive a 0 regardless of the quality of the work. When you check the word count of your essay, remember that headings, titles, and works cited pages do not count. Essays that are so riddled with grammatical and mechanical errors that a reader must struggle to understand the basic meaning of sentences will receive a failing grade regardless of the quality of the ideas. Essays that contain unsupported claims or that rely on disreputable research sources will be penalized by at least one letter grade. If you have questions about the credibility of a source, seek the instructor’s approval well before the essay deadline. Portfolios that pass the basic checks listed above will be graded using the following criteria: Content (25 points) Multiple items make up the portfolio. Begin with the reflective essay. Follow that with the essay you chose. Follow that will all supporting documents (feedback, drafts, etc). Everything will go into one MS Word file. Organization (25 points) The Reflective Essay must include a thesis statement, and the thesis should be placed at the end of the introduction. All body paragraphs should explore why the essay you chose was the one that taught you the most about writing Mechanics (25 points) The Portfolio and Reflective Essay will be nearly free of mistakes in grammar and punctuation. Documentation (15 points) Essays should be documented using MLA format for both in-text parenthetical citations and the Works Cited / Reference page. Format (10 points) Essays should be formatted using the appropriate style guidelines. Cite paragraph numbers for electronic sources Example: (Smith para 3).

Your goal for this essay is to evaluate the costs and benefits of a project or plan. The project or plan on which you focus should be as close to home as possible—it should be located in your town, state, region, or even in a specific, familiar place. The project or plan you choose to evaluate could be a proposed response to an issue in the government, the education system, the environment, etc. In other words, you could choose an issue (such as unemployment in Pennsylvania), find a large-scale plan that has been proposed to solve the issue (such as a specific policy change), and weigh the costs and benefits in terms of money, time, environmental safety, and/or human life or quality of life. Think of this study as a “pros and cons” essay that ends with your conclusion, based on your research, about whether or not the project should be started or the plan should be enacted, and why. Imagine your audience to be a section of the public that is only generally familiar with the issue. Format: -This essay must be written in APA format, with a Title Page, Abstract, Body, and References. -The essay must be 5-6 pages long, typed in Times New Roman font, and double-spaced. The Title Page, Abstract, and References do not count toward the 5-6 page requirement. Sources: -This essay requires at least 6 researched sources, such as books, newspapers, magazines, journals, government documents, or expert interviews. -Only academic-type sources will be accepted—print sources, sources from the library online, or credible online sources ending in “.edu,” “.gov,” or “.org.” The use of Wikipedia or general websites ending in “.com” will not be accepted; online newspapers can, however, end in “.com.” -Any source you consult for this essay must be used in in-text citations and listed in the References page. Style: -Write in a formal tone; do not use “I” or “you.” -Images and graphs are not required and will not count toward the 5-6 page requirement. the assignment is more to find a plan or project that is already being discussed on more of a community or political level, not on a personal level. Topic: whether or not certain changes to planned parenthood are feasible?

You may include one or a few aspects of the capital punishment from the list in the paper: – Your opinion on death penalty – Impact on the society at large – Contemporary views on death penalty – Views from main ethical theories – Legal status in US and/or other countries

Qualitative Research Report
MSc Psychology
Qualitative Research Report – 50% of the final grade
Aim of the qualitative project
This assignment aims to test your ability to analyse qualitative interview data and write up a qualitative research report. You will be using interview data that you have collected.
Instructions
Word limit: 1,500 words. The 1,500 word limit applies to the main body of the text (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion and Conclusions). It does not include the abstract, the table of participants and table of themes, the quotes used in the results section, the references, or the appendices.
During the first session on interviews and focus groups you will get into groups of ideally five students (between four and six students per group is acceptable). This will form your research group. Through discussion within your group, and in consultation with the module leader, you will define your topic for your qualitative research project, design a semi-structured interview schedule, participant information sheet, and consent form.
In your own time (ideally during reading week) you will conduct one semi-structured interview lasting approximately 20-30 minutes using the participant information sheet, consent form and interview schedule. You will then transcribe and anonymise your transcript and share this with other members, who will also share their transcripts with you.*
During the second seminar session in Week 6 you will have the opportunity to analyse your interview transcripts. It is recommended that you use thematic analysisfor the analysis. However, groups or individuals that wish to use a different analytic method are able to if they receive the approval of the module leader.
Each student must produce an individual write-up of their qualitative research study. This write-up can be based on the themes identified during the group analysis of the transcripts or on further qualitative data analysis conducted by the individual student. Thus, the writing up of the report is not a collaborative effort. Whilst all reports will be scrutinised for plagiarism prior to marking, the nature of any plagiarism will form the basis of this scrutiny. That is, it is accepted that different reports from the same group are likely to share some features in common such as description of interview questions, names of themes, and quotes used to illustrate these themes.
*Please note that any student who does not engage with the group activity for this assignment and who does not produce an interview transcript that is shared with whole group, will be required to conduct their own study collecting at least three interviews, analysing the data, and writing up a research report.
Writing up your project
The structure of your assignment needs to follow the general requirements of scientific journals.
1. Title:
• Brief
• Explicitly state qualitative methodology
• Include method of analysis
2. Abstract:
• Purpose
• Methods (including study design and statistical methods)
• Results
• Discussion
3. Introduction
• The focus and rationale for the study supported by literature.
4. Methodology
• Participants with table of participants (table not included in word count)
• Design
• The interview
• Procedure
• Ethical considerations
• Data analysis method
5. Results
• Table of themes and sub-themes (not included in word count)
• Description of themes, illustration of themes (using quotes), interpretation of themes
• The results section can focus on a selected number of themes and does not need to cover all of the themes identified during analysis
• Illustrate themes with selected quotes (quotes not included in word count)
• Analyse rather than describe
6. Discussion and Conclusion
• Pull together your findings
• Refer back to the existing literature during Discussion
• Briefly describe any strengths and weaknesses of your study
• End with a brief summary of what you found, situate your results in the context of what is currently known about your topic. Make suggestion as to how/if your findings could be useful in practice and if further research in this area could be useful.
7. References
8. Appendices:
• Copy of participant information sheet and consent form (unsigned)
• Copy of semi-structured interview schedule
• Full,anonymisedinterview transcript preferably with coding (coding can be handwritten)
• Any additional workings demonstrating how the final table of themes was generated